Quote:
Originally Posted by BavarianFanatic
You really need to reconsider what you're suggesting here. Do you really think it makes any sense whatsoever for a manufacturer to take the blame for something that has happened regardless of whom is at fault? This is not based on sound logic.
|
Is that what I said? No. The manufacturer has a responsibility to ensure that their product does not burst into flames under normal operation,
especially during the warranty period. An inconclusive finding does not absolve them of all responsibility. As it's inconclusive, it does not imply 100% responsibility, either.
Quote:
|
I hate to say it, but I think this sort of logic based on entitlement and the need to blame somebody is really why our society is in the shape it's in. I'm reminded of this idiocy every day when I drink coffee from a cup that warns me my coffee is hot. No shit my coffee is hot. It's coffee.
|
I agree with this, but it has no bearing on this particular situation. I think we'll just need to agree to disagree on this one.