F30POST
F30POST
2012-2015 BMW 3-Series and 4-Series Forum
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
BMW 3-Series and 4-Series Forum (F30 / F32) | F30POST > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > General BMW News and Cars Discussion > Report: BMW Bids to Purchase Saab
Extreme Powerhouse
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      02-25-2012, 02:21 AM   #67
Desert_Fox
Drop-Top Turbo
Desert_Fox's Avatar
North Korea
181
Rep
598
Posts

Drives: 2013 991 C2S/ 2013 335is E93
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Diego, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
SAAB needs to be dramatically changed if it is to survive. The local dealer here is stuffed with unsold 9-5's... even though they stopped making them almost a year ago. The appeal just isn't there, and while i'd like to see some new designs from a european company- if I were BMW i'd save my money.
__________________
Current 2013 Porsche 991 Carrera S [Agate Gray] [Black] PDK, PASM, Sport Chrono, Sport Seats, Sport Techno Wheels, BOSE
Current 2013 BMW 335is E93 [Mineral White] [Coral Red] DCT, Premium Pkg, Convenience Pkg, Nav, Heated Seats, HK, BMW Apps
Appreciate 0
      02-25-2012, 04:16 AM   #68
GeeRam
Major
GeeRam's Avatar
United Kingdom
195
Rep
1,317
Posts

Drives: X5 40d SE
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Berkshire,UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by az34 View Post
saab need BMW; BMW does'nt need Saab.
BMW 'might' need a European modern, production facility, that is ready to go, and a fraction of the price of building a new somewhere else

If BMW's angle is competing in the fwd Euro 'family' market then buying the Saab brand is a LOT better than putting the BMW badge on a fwd...... as many others have said, so gets my vote.

As a previous Saab owner as well, I'd rather see a BMW owned Saab than a Chinese one.
__________________
2017 X5 4.0dSE ~ Atlas Cedar:Ind.Amaro Brown Merino&Piano Blk, Sport Auto, DHP, Comfort seats, Cold weather pack, HK audio, Electric towbar, Sun protection glass.
Appreciate 0
      02-25-2012, 04:23 AM   #69
GeeRam
Major
GeeRam's Avatar
United Kingdom
195
Rep
1,317
Posts

Drives: X5 40d SE
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Berkshire,UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmsent View Post
I keep reading how GM ruined SAAB. But if SAAB had been a viable company they wouldn't have ever been acquired by GM. When GM bought them, SAAB was out of money, and was still selling ancient models. The pre GM SAAB 900 dated all the way back to the 99 with a few modifications. They had no money to develop a new generation. The 9000 was never a pure SAAB vehicle, with its platform sourced from Alfa, as I recall.
Not quite recalled correctly.
The 9000 was a jointly developed Saab/Fiat-Lancia platform..... the design being led from Sweden.

And................ Saab DID have a 'old 900' successor very well ahead in development prior to GM buying a 50% stake in Saab back in 1990. However, GM looked at it and said, it's too expensive, dump it and told the Saab engineers, "here's this old Vauxhall/Opel platform, go and do something 'very cheap and quick' with this instead"
__________________
2017 X5 4.0dSE ~ Atlas Cedar:Ind.Amaro Brown Merino&Piano Blk, Sport Auto, DHP, Comfort seats, Cold weather pack, HK audio, Electric towbar, Sun protection glass.
Appreciate 0
      02-25-2012, 12:40 PM   #70
Fraggy
Brigadier General
Fraggy's Avatar
United_States
193
Rep
3,469
Posts

Drives: 2016 M3
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Diego

iTrader: (11)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JB135MDCT
As long as China doesn't get Saab, I'm happy.
Absolutely, anything to keep it out of those hands.
__________________
2016 Alpine White M3 (gone)
2019 Alfa Romeo Guilia (Totaled)
2020 Car-less 😁 (no more)
2020 M340
Appreciate 0
      02-26-2012, 07:40 AM   #71
dj john
Private First Class
Norway
6
Rep
196
Posts

Drives: 118d performance
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: vestfold

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert_Fox
SAAB needs to be dramatically changed if it is to survive. The local dealer here is stuffed with unsold 9-5's... even though they stopped making them almost a year ago. The appeal just isn't there, and while i'd like to see some new designs from a european company- if I were BMW i'd save my money.
I think Bmw know what ther plans with Saab is..if they buy it.
Appreciate 0
      02-26-2012, 10:54 AM   #72
ENINTY
Banned
170
Rep
3,415
Posts

Drives: 2006 325i Sport
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmsent View Post
I keep reading how GM ruined SAAB. But if SAAB had been a viable company they wouldn't have ever been acquired by GM. When GM bought them, SAAB was out of money, and was still selling ancient models. The pre GM SAAB 900 dated all the way back to the 99 with a few modifications. They had no money to develop a new generation. The 9000 was never a pure SAAB vehicle, with its platform sourced from Alfa, as I recall. These cars were quirky to say the least, the dealer network was terrible, and they were falling further and further behind. Yes, GM failed to keep SAAB going in the long term, but SAAB was in big trouble long before GM came along. As for BMW saving them, I really don't see the point. BMW's reputation is far better than SAAB's in virtually every respect, SAAB's sales have never been very large, and their dealer network is in shambles.
Thank you. This is exactly on point. GM's mistake was buying Saab in the first place. Saab should have died in the early '90s. The only thing GM could do with it was share common parts and platforms in an attempt to make Saab profitable. Which is what also led Ford into trouble as well, trying to save small, boutique car companies that design great cars (in most instances) but are expensive, unprofitable, and don’t appeal to a wide automotive consumer base to justify their existence.
Large automotive companies are only profitable when the costs of engineering and production are amortized over a vast array of vehicle sales, which is why every car company (regardless of what BMW tries to advertize) shares platforms between models and brands. Volkswagen is currently on a quest to become the world’s largest and most profitable automotive company. Their strategy to achieve this goal is to design, manufacture, and sell as many cars as possible from one (or a few) base platforms. Right now VW AG makes something on the order of 12 different cars off of one platform.

Saab would have never survived as an automotive company past 1993 as the global auto industry was consolidating to fewer and fewer platforms to build cars from. Saab was too small to remain in business and undercapitalized to develop new products.

All this means is BMW will just increase the price of the 3 series even further to offset the massive financial burden Saab will bestow on BMW.

Please just let Saab die.
Appreciate 0
      02-27-2012, 03:21 PM   #73
DASHOCKER
The power of V!
DASHOCKER's Avatar
Germany
99
Rep
1,971
Posts

Drives: 2007 335i coupe steptronic
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
1998 Lexus Gs400  [0.00]
2010 ebony & ivory  [0.00]
2006 BMW X3  [0.00]
2009 pics  [0.00]
2009 e92 335 xdrive  [0.00]
just look @ mini's success under bmw. it will work.
__________________
2007 335 coupe Alpine white, steptronic, sportpack, etc. (gone)
2006 X3 3.0 steptronic Titanium Silver, 2009 E92 335xdrive, next.... Caddy CTS_V! 13 Lincoln MKZ? hmmm.
Appreciate 0
      02-27-2012, 03:34 PM   #74
rfx45
Lieutenant
rfx45's Avatar
United_States
39
Rep
560
Posts

Drives: E89
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2012 BMW Z4  [8.50]
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeeRam View Post
However, GM looked at it and said, it's too expensive, dump it and told the Saab engineers, "here's this old Vauxhall/Opel platform, go and do something 'very cheap and quick' with this instead"
Anybody saw the Top Gear segment on Saab last night? They explained that GM gave Saab the Vauxhall platform and told them to just change the body and nothing else but Saab went the other way and built a different vehicle and it flopped. The next year/gen, GM said the same thing by giving them a platform and to just change the body and nothing else but again Saab pretty much said "F U" and made whatever they wanted and flopped once again.

It seems like Saab was just very stubborn and didn't want to evolve or change, which could be a good thing but if no one is buying their product then what is the point? So can BMW actually push Saab to change if they do acquire them? I guess time will only tell.
__________________
2012 Z4
http://e89.zpost.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=32142&dateline=132899  8397
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 05:20 AM   #75
MikeyV
Captain
74
Rep
805
Posts

Drives: Audi A6 Avant & A1 Sportback
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Norway

iTrader: (0)

What Saab models are you talking about, all current Saabs sit on Opel plafroms and have done for a long time. FYI the Subaru Tribeca was co developed with Saab, there was a model with a Saab front and rear end with a Saab interior booked for the Geneva show in 2005, GM killed it at the 11th hour, instrad we got the 9-7.
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2012, 12:03 PM   #76
JB135MDCT
I'm just a cook
JB135MDCT's Avatar
United_States
24
Rep
971
Posts

Drives: 2011 135i DCT
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MD

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rfx45 View Post
Anybody saw the Top Gear segment on Saab last night? They explained that GM gave Saab the Vauxhall platform and told them to just change the body and nothing else but Saab went the other way and built a different vehicle and it flopped. The next year/gen, GM said the same thing by giving them a platform and to just change the body and nothing else but again Saab pretty much said "F U" and made whatever they wanted and flopped once again.

It seems like Saab was just very stubborn and didn't want to evolve or change, which could be a good thing but if no one is buying their product then what is the point? So can BMW actually push Saab to change if they do acquire them? I guess time will only tell.
Get your story straight, GM FfUuCcHhTt Saab!!!
Appreciate 0
      02-29-2012, 01:56 AM   #77
MikeyV
Captain
74
Rep
805
Posts

Drives: Audi A6 Avant & A1 Sportback
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Norway

iTrader: (0)

Also interesting to see that BMW have applied to the trademark the Triumph badge, looks like I was thinking along the same lines as BMW, why buy Saab when you already have a cool badge which you already own and can use without sorting through the baggage which would come with a Saab purchase.
Appreciate 0
      03-01-2012, 03:38 AM   #78
tranism
Care Bears vs Klingons
United_States
32
Rep
205
Posts

Drives: 128i Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeyV View Post
What Saab models are you talking about, all current Saabs sit on Opel plafroms and have done for a long time. FYI the Subaru Tribeca was co developed with Saab, there was a model with a Saab front and rear end with a Saab interior booked for the Geneva show in 2005, GM killed it at the 11th hour, instrad we got the 9-7.
They were referring to the 9-3 and current 9-5. GM apparently told Saab to create a variant of the vauxhall vectra aka opel vectra. The Saabs ended up sharing only about 30% of the same parts. Everything else required custom tooling and parts. Moreover, GM felt Saab wasted resources like spending loads of money on creating their own navigation system instead of using GM's. On top of that, Saab was falling way behind BMW, Audi, and Merc in the infotainment research space. By the time they created their Phoenix platform and new iQon infotainment system, the company had no money left. They lost money on every 9-3 sold. The 9-5 was rushed to production before it was completed to try and make some cash. In the end, it was all too little, too late. Their new owners Spyker simply did not have the finances to keep the company afloat.
Appreciate 0
      03-01-2012, 12:17 PM   #79
rfx45
Lieutenant
rfx45's Avatar
United_States
39
Rep
560
Posts

Drives: E89
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2012 BMW Z4  [8.50]
Quote:
Originally Posted by JB135MDCT View Post
Get your story straight, GM FfUuCcHhTt Saab!!!
Pretty much this.


Quote:
Originally Posted by tranism View Post
They were referring to the 9-3 and current 9-5. GM apparently told Saab to create a variant of the vauxhall vectra aka opel vectra. The Saabs ended up sharing only about 30% of the same parts. Everything else required custom tooling and parts. Moreover, GM felt Saab wasted resources like spending loads of money on creating their own navigation system instead of using GM's. On top of that, Saab was falling way behind BMW, Audi, and Merc in the infotainment research space. By the time they created their Phoenix platform and new iQon infotainment system, the company had no money left. They lost money on every 9-3 sold. The 9-5 was rushed to production before it was completed to try and make some cash. In the end, it was all too little, too late. Their new owners Spyker simply did not have the finances to keep the company afloat.

I can't say I am an expert on Saabs history but TG UK certainly made them out to be some stubborn SoBs. From what I understand, GM actually tried to help them but just completely ignored them so it seems their downfall is from their own doing.
__________________
2012 Z4
http://e89.zpost.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=32142&dateline=132899  8397
Appreciate 0
      03-21-2012, 09:46 PM   #80
youmeill
New Member
0
Rep
27
Posts

Drives: nissna
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: usa

iTrader: (0)

I've always liked Saabs for some strange reason, and I'm sure whatever they would do to Saab would be an improvement. But really? Saab just came back with 2 refreshed models and it's in bankruptcy?
__________________
vvme.com
Appreciate 0
      04-02-2012, 03:20 PM   #81
SE3P_to_E90
Banned
United_States
223
Rep
3,031
Posts

Drives: E90 Msport + E83 Msport
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MD

iTrader: (29)

SAAB = Something An Ass Bought

please don't buy saab. BMW will sob.
Appreciate 0
      04-05-2012, 09:22 PM   #82
Casper
Banned
2
Rep
29
Posts

Drives: 325i
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ENINTY View Post
Thank you. This is exactly on point. GM's mistake was buying Saab in the first place. Saab should have died in the early '90s. The only thing GM could do with it was share common parts and platforms in an attempt to make Saab profitable. Which is what also led Ford into trouble as well, trying to save small, boutique car companies that design great cars (in most instances) but are expensive, unprofitable, and don’t appeal to a wide automotive consumer base to justify their existence.
Large automotive companies are only profitable when the costs of engineering and production are amortized over a vast array of vehicle sales, which is why every car company (regardless of what BMW tries to advertize) shares platforms between models and brands. Volkswagen is currently on a quest to become the world’s largest and most profitable automotive company. Their strategy to achieve this goal is to design, manufacture, and sell as many cars as possible from one (or a few) base platforms. Right now VW AG makes something on the order of 12 different cars off of one platform.

Saab would have never survived as an automotive company past 1993 as the global auto industry was consolidating to fewer and fewer platforms to build cars from. Saab was too small to remain in business and undercapitalized to develop new products.

All this means is BMW will just increase the price of the 3 series even further to offset the massive financial burden Saab will bestow on BMW.

Please just let Saab die.
+1000!
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 AM.




f30post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST