F30POST
F30POST
2012-2015 BMW 3-Series and 4-Series Forum
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
BMW 3-Series and 4-Series Forum (F30 / F32) | F30POST > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > General BMW News and Cars Discussion > BMW 1 Series Sedan Coming, But in FWD :(
Extreme Powerhouse
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      09-27-2013, 03:04 PM   #89
Red Bread
Major General
United_States
4462
Rep
9,160
Posts

Drives: Smog machines
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by touringfanatic View Post
Simply heretical and wrong. They're not going to gain anything but ruining probably the best driving hatchback known to mankind. Reasons for which they call this an improvement are ridiculuos and they're trying to keep up with the competition they already outsell. Those who don't comprehend the loss ought to drive any of the e8x 1series models. It really was the ultimate driving machine in its class that is going to be killed for ultimate grocery runabout. BMW won't see any justifiable financial gain either in the end because this decision is a fundamental misunderstanding of the marketplace (In my modest opinion their decions were made because of the success of the current a-class and the thing they're so wrong about is that is more successful because of the much improved design and not the more spacious fwd arangement) .
I'm not really arguing for a fwd car, but having worked in Germany when the E87 came out, and having access to a car pool where you could pick it or a Golf (plus many others, but I drove those two frequently, plus a few E91 wagons) it was not the better car. Sales numbers and magazine reviews clearly back this up. The 1er understeered more than the Golf, had the stupid RFTs and the resulting choppy ride, the transmission tunnel rendered the middle rear seat a joke and the FR layout made front seat leg room relatively short when compared to the Mk4 and especially the Mk5 Golf.

This didn't keep me from buying an E82 135i when they came out over here, but it still had lots of inherent understeer, RFT tires (until I replaced them) and less room than a Golf inside. But it at least had the power to induce plenty of throttle based oversteer and also had much better brakes than the other E8x cars.

If BMW is going to compete in this market, MINI can only do so much and without starting yet another silly sub brand like the i cars, this seems like the only solution. Provided (and this is huge for me) they offer a rwd sedan that's smaller than the F30, I don't mind if there's a smaller, fwd car underneath it that offers more practicality and more efficiency. I just hope there's more than what MB is offering with a larger C Class and the CLA which is not much smaller than the F30.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 03:11 PM   #90
Roberto Cervezas
Private First Class
3
Rep
120
Posts

Drives: 2013 E92 335i M Sport 6MT
Join Date: May 2013
Location: PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by USC2000 View Post
Funny how everyone seems to know what's best for BMW. Probably because BMW has no experience as a car manufacturer. Maybe you all can work for them and save the company before it's too late. I'm sure it would be really successful.
If you don't like it, move on. Everyone complains about all the new models before they are out, yet so many people seem to be buying them and enjoying them when they are released. Why is that? Hmmm.
All the complainers should read this. So many assume that what they want is what would be best for the company, and if the company doesn't delivery exactly what they want then the sky is falling and it's time to jump ship. If you don't like it, stick with your 200,000 mile E36 325 and Sony Discman, and stop complaining.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 03:33 PM   #91
mookie45
Major
mookie45's Avatar
769
Rep
1,271
Posts

Drives: 2017 AW 340i M-Sport
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Brickell

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by late apex View Post
Because they're competing with everyone else. If Mercedes and Audi are offering little FWD cars, BMW probably doesn't feel like they can win over enough customers with a RWD model. So they'll offer FWD & AWD as well. As enthusiast we want RWD, but it's the masses that companies make the majority of their money from. The FWD cars that Mercedes and Audi make aren't for enthusiast either so this is BMW positioning themselves to compete for overall sales. Hopefully BMW has plans in place for some new RWD cars to please enthusiast.
But wouldn't a non-enthusiasts not really care if its fwd or rwd? I doubt the masses are demanding for fwd or even have a preference.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 03:36 PM   #92
mookie45
Major
mookie45's Avatar
769
Rep
1,271
Posts

Drives: 2017 AW 340i M-Sport
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Brickell

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roberto Cervezas View Post
This is on target. True enthusiasts make up a small portion of not only BMW's sales, but even brands like Porsche have a large number of people that buy just for the name.
If the masses really don't have a preference of fwd or rwd then why not just keep the rwd standard?
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 03:41 PM   #93
Roberto Cervezas
Private First Class
3
Rep
120
Posts

Drives: 2013 E92 335i M Sport 6MT
Join Date: May 2013
Location: PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mookie45 View Post
If the masses really don't have a preference of fwd or rwd then why not just keep the rwd standard?
RWD is more expensive to produce than FWD. This is what originally made companies switch to FWD. They told everyone that FWD handled better and did better in the snow, which wasn't true.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 03:42 PM   #94
ep_83
Private First Class
29
Rep
121
Posts

Drives: 2013 Cadillac ATS 2.0T
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: FL, USA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mookie45 View Post
If the masses really don't have a preference of fwd or rwd then why not just keep the rwd standard?
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe it's cheaper to build FWD cars. If that's true, then BMW is simply trying to introduce a car at a price point that is competitive with it's german rivals.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 03:43 PM   #95
Teutonic
Colonel
Teutonic's Avatar
No_Country
2706
Rep
2,350
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roberto Cervezas View Post
All the complainers should read this. So many assume that what they want is what would be best for the company, and if the company doesn't delivery exactly what they want then the sky is falling and it's time to jump ship. If you don't like it, stick with your 200,000 mile E36 325 and Sony Discman, and stop complaining.
I don't think there is one person in here that bought a BMW because it "would be best for the company". Or you and the other guy don't get it? The complaints are not about the company financial portfolio, -which nobody cares anyway because that is their problem-, they are about the product they deliver.

No, the sky is not gonna fall, relax man, you can buy that FWD BMW rival for Aston Martin Cygnet soon.
If somebody fights for something it means it cares about that, there is a big difference. Here, we all love BMW, otherwise we will not bother arguing about those cars.

Also, there is no need to stick with a Sony discman (BTW, tube amplifieres rules and SA CD still sounds better than any data loss iPod or other "evolved" MP3 player you might use, so your analogy is very poor), there are many companies offering good products.
You know, a true melomaniac does not listen his Zeppelin concert in his iPad.
You might call it evolution, but it is not. It is just an afordable compromise.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 03:45 PM   #96
Teutonic
Colonel
Teutonic's Avatar
No_Country
2706
Rep
2,350
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roberto Cervezas View Post
RWD is more expensive to produce than FWD. This is what originally made companies switch to FWD. They told everyone that FWD handled better and did better in the snow, which wasn't true.
You just proved my point. It is cheaper. A compromise.
And BTW, FWD does better in the snow than RWD.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 03:50 PM   #97
mookie45
Major
mookie45's Avatar
769
Rep
1,271
Posts

Drives: 2017 AW 340i M-Sport
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Brickell

iTrader: (4)

BMW

The Ultimate German Toyota
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 03:55 PM   #98
Roberto Cervezas
Private First Class
3
Rep
120
Posts

Drives: 2013 E92 335i M Sport 6MT
Join Date: May 2013
Location: PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tracus View Post
I don't think there is one person in here that bought a BMW because it "would be best for the company". Or you and the other guy don't get it? The complaints are not about the company financial portfolio, -which nobody cares anyway because that is their problem-, they are about the product they deliver.

No, the sky is not gonna fall, relax man, you can buy that FWD BMW rival for Aston Martin Cygnet soon.
If somebody fights for something it means it cares about that, there is a big difference. Here, we all love BMW, otherwise we will not bother arguing about those cars.

Also, there is no need to stick with a Sony discman (BTW, tube amplifieres rules and SA CD still sounds better than any data loss iPod or other "evolved" MP3 player you might use, so your analogy is very poor), there are many companies offering good products.
You know, a true melomaniac does not listen his Zeppelin concert in his iPad.
You might call it evolution, but it is not. It is just an afordable compromise.
You're probably not in my line of fire if you know that tube amplifiers rule, and I by no means would buy a fwd BMW. The fact cannot be ignored that companies need to make money, and a car of this type is what will allow BMW to produce the cars people on this forum want. BMW is not getting rid of rwd, so why are so many freaking out and saying they are leaving the brand? I guess that was the point I was making.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 03:57 PM   #99
Small Yellow
Track Addict
Small Yellow's Avatar
Taiwan
110
Rep
813
Posts

Drives: 2010 BMW M3 E92 | 2008 Z4M E86
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Orange County, California

iTrader: (0)

Leave the FWD to Mini Cooper. Just like how the ultra luxury is left to Rolls Royce.
__________________
BMW ///M3 Coupe
Completed November 16, 2009
Received December 29,2009
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 04:00 PM   #100
Roberto Cervezas
Private First Class
3
Rep
120
Posts

Drives: 2013 E92 335i M Sport 6MT
Join Date: May 2013
Location: PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tracus View Post
You just proved my point. It is cheaper. A compromise.
And BTW, FWD does better in the snow than RWD.
FWD does not do better in the snow. A car with more of its weight on the drive wheels does better in the snow. If the weight is over the front wheels on a fwd car then it will have decent traction. Against a rwd Porsche with snow tires though, it will not do well since the Porsche has an even larger percentage of its weight on the drive wheels. The X factor is physics, which dictates that the cars weight will transfer to the rear of the car under acceleration. Rwd for the win, in my opinion.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 04:03 PM   #101
mkoesel
Moderator
United_States
7506
Rep
19,370
Posts

Drives: No BMW for now
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canton, MI

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tracus View Post
And BTW, FWD does better in the snow than RWD.
Both have two drive wheels so traction is roughly the same given same size and type of tires. Driving dynamics are very different and require different skills. Many people like to be able to steer with the throttle (myself included). A FWD car is difficult-to-impossible to course correct with throttle and counter steer.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 04:12 PM   #102
Red Bread
Major General
United_States
4462
Rep
9,160
Posts

Drives: Smog machines
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkoesel View Post
Both have two drive wheels so traction is roughly the same given same size and type of tires.
This is really only true if you keep the weight distribution the same, so comparing a fwd car with a 65/35 balance is going to have much better traction than all but things like a 911, with a 35/65 balance.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 04:13 PM   #103
aus
Major General
United_States
888
Rep
9,031
Posts

Drives: Odysse
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seal Beach, CA

iTrader: (10)

Quote:
Originally Posted by wakedaze View Post
BMW is REALLY positioning itself to be the German Toyota.
All the manufactures feel they need to produced 6,000,000 cars a YEAR to survive. Not sure why that's the majic number, but they're all going for more volume to try to reduce costs.
I just think it cheapens the brand. That's what Mini is suppose to do, but they'll build this on the Mini chasis and charge 20% more.

.
__________________
Let me get this straight... You are swapping out parts designed by some of the top engineers in the world because some guys sponsored by a company told you it's "better??" But when you ask the same guy about tracking, "oh no, I have a kid now" or "I just detailed my car." or "i just got new tires."
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 04:32 PM   #104
Teutonic
Colonel
Teutonic's Avatar
No_Country
2706
Rep
2,350
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Bread View Post
This is really only true if you keep the weight distribution the same, so comparing a fwd car with a 65/35 balance is going to have much better traction than all but things like a 911, with a 35/65 balance.
Exactly.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 04:33 PM   #105
mkoesel
Moderator
United_States
7506
Rep
19,370
Posts

Drives: No BMW for now
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canton, MI

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTT26 View Post
...and for BMW to grow in that segment then their COMPACT cars have to grow in terms of packaging and the solution to increase interior space is by adopting FWD.
Or the i3, which makes all FWD compact cars look like dinosaurs including those from MINI dare I say. In my mind the future of the compact performance sedan must be in the i3 DNA or it will simply wither and fade away.

I truly hope that this technology continues to evolve and merges into mainstream BMWs so the 2 Series is can be RWD like the i3.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 04:40 PM   #106
mkoesel
Moderator
United_States
7506
Rep
19,370
Posts

Drives: No BMW for now
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canton, MI

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Bread View Post
This is really only true if you keep the weight distribution the same, so comparing a fwd car with a 65/35 balance is going to have much better traction than all but things like a 911, with a 35/65 balance.
Agree that weight balance effects things, but there is also weight transfer. In the end you will be noticing the vastly different handling characteristics long before traction differences - at least in my experience.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 04:47 PM   #107
Red Bread
Major General
United_States
4462
Rep
9,160
Posts

Drives: Smog machines
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkoesel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Bread View Post
This is really only true if you keep the weight distribution the same, so comparing a fwd car with a 65/35 balance is going to have much better traction than all but things like a 911, with a 35/65 balance.
Agree that weight balance effects things, but there is also weight transfer. In the end you will be noticing the vastly different handling characteristics long before traction differences - at least in my experience.
Agreed, for those of us that have track experience and care. My wife would plow into the first thing she came across with rwd but can manage with awd or fwd.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 04:59 PM   #108
ep_83
Private First Class
29
Rep
121
Posts

Drives: 2013 Cadillac ATS 2.0T
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: FL, USA

iTrader: (0)

I wonder if the M division will build an AWD M version of this 1 series to compete with the CLA AMG and RS3. If so, I'd expect a price tag of about 50k. That's about the same price as a 335xi Msport with better performance for those looking for a high performance sedan.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 05:31 PM   #109
rpagianotto
Private First Class
98
Rep
135
Posts

Drives: F22 m235i 8AT
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: São Paulo

iTrader: (0)

Disregarding the goodbye to the world's last RWD hatchback, which is a colossal shame, I actually would've preferred to see a bmw subbrand (akin to bmw i) to promote these cheaper fwd cars than to have one amidst bmw's main lineup.

It is really saddening for a bmw fan to see the company slowly (well, not that slowly as a matter of fact) throw away all principles that once led to the "ultimate driving machine" in favor of market share.

And even though I understand the need to look for other pieces of the market in order to expand, I actually do think they're undermining their legacy that got them to the top of the premium brands in the first place.

That research about how 1er owners didn't know their cars were RWD was misinterpreted, in my opinion. The fact that a consumer doesn't understand how a car works does not mean they don't appreciate how well it performs, especially in comparison to the competition.

I think it was Henry Ford that said if consumers were asked what they wanted at the time the car was invented, they would've answered a faster horse instead of a motored carriage, even thought they would've preferred the carriage all along, and never knew it.

BMW consumers (at least historically) want a car that has more dynamic and sporting appeals than the competition, and RWD plays a huge part in giving BMWs that dynamic edge, even if only a small part of the consumers (us, enthusiasts) is actually aware of how it works. But a FWD 1er has no difference in comparison to an a3 or an A-Klasse, except for the design and the badge.

Unfortunately, though, that just means that the consumer profile of bmw will change - enthusiasts will have to look elsewhere since their cars no longer have that dynamic edge, and all that's left will be badge whores and poseurs. A pity, really.

But, just as the consumer is only interested in their own needs and wants, BMW is only interested in profits. So, to each their own. My f20 is my first BMW, but the way things are going, I don't even know if I'll ever go for a second. In any case, to me, doomsday came way before this announcement, though - it happened when car magazines elected a cadillac as a better driver's car than a 3 series.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2013, 06:20 PM   #110
Marioalex24
Lieutenant
Marioalex24's Avatar
Mexico
20
Rep
427
Posts

Drives: E46 M3
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: So Cal

iTrader: (0)

WTF. NNNNNNOOOOOOO. Not the 2 series.

Well I would only be happy if it's super light and has a good weight distribution and handeling.

I currently own the Mini Coupe JCW and it's a blast. I love the feel and quick it gets around. I always said I would never drive a FWD or nothing less than a V8, when I had muscle cars. But these European cars especially BMW man they sure make your mind change. Look at the M3 and M4 it's I6 turbo and for what they say. It's going to be a great car.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 PM.




f30post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST