F30POST
F30POST
2012-2015 BMW 3-Series and 4-Series Forum
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
BMW 3-Series and 4-Series Forum (F30 / F32) | F30POST > 2012-2019 BMW 3 and 4-Series Forums > General F30 Sedan / F32 Coupe / F36 Gran Coupe Forum > F30 3 series performs 'marginally' in new IIHS crash safety tests
Studio RSR
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      08-14-2012, 04:18 PM   #67
bradleyland
TIM YOYO
United_States
1504
Rep
3,282
Posts

Drives: 2013 M3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by av689 View Post
It's really strange that bmw, benz or lexus stopped right "in the wall", while for example volvo somehow flew it by with the front wheel gone aside. And that's cuz of their super safety design or that yellow peace of metal which was strengthened? emm bullshit. concurrence of circumstances, nothing more
That yellow piece of metal is designed to deflect in a way that the car can slide around the object it is impacting. Crash survival is all about the speed at which you decelerate. Deflecting away from the barrier is a great option, even if it means you'll hit something else. By deflecting, your some of your inertial energy is transferred in to the first object. When you hit the second object, you're already slowed down significantly, and have a higher rate of survival.

There's no way to spin this. Volvo has the right idea.

It's not the end of the world though. As noted in the video, this type of crash isn't the one that kills you, it's the one that breaks your legs. Fun times!
__________________
His: 2019 R1250GS - Black
Hers: 2013 X3 28i - N20 Mineral Silver / Sand Beige / Premium, Tech
Past: 2013 ///M3 - Interlagos Blue Black M-DCT
Past: 2010 135i - TiAg Coral Red 6MT ///M-Sport
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 04:47 PM   #68
Robert
Major General
414
Rep
6,968
Posts

Drives: 135i -> is350 -> Tesla M3 perf
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Socal

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PAMidge View Post

People don't just barrel into something at 40mph. They hit the brake. That totally changes the forces, angles and dynamics of how the occupants are positioned and moving.


If they want to hit the barrier at 40mph that's fine, but start at 60 and hit the brakes so that it's going 40 when it hits the barrier, then you can see that the occupant may already be leaning slightly forward and see if the dip in the front end plays a significant role in the forces on the vehicle.

Who drives 60 in their BMW or European cars. In reality most BMW drivers around my area do 80 and the fast drivers are doing 90-100. It's perfectly realistic to say they are able to shave off 60mph from 100 to hit the center divider or a pole at 40. This is a slap across the face on most German cars.
__________________
- There's nothing in my pocket other than knives and lint
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 04:56 PM   #69
WilliCO
Captain
WilliCO's Avatar
United_States
98
Rep
900
Posts

Drives: 2013 F10 535 xDrive MSport
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Denver

iTrader: (0)

Agree. This is a poor showing on an important test. It's a terrible day for BMW right now; this isn't good at all.

People on BMW internet forums can rationalize the test result all day long, but it's still a crash test result where BMW performed poorly. Nothing positive about it, unless you count Audi and Mercedes coming in even worse.
__________________
-Will
2013 535i xDrive M-Sport | 2005 545i Sport (Retired and missed) | 2001 X5 3.0 Sport (Retired)
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 05:05 PM   #70
adelphi_sky
First Lieutenant
12
Rep
374
Posts

Drives: 2009 BMW 328i Jet Black
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Adelphi, MD

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by WJGreer View Post
Nothing positive about it, unless you count Audi and Mercedes coming in even worse.
What's with all the doom and gloom? Do you know the odds on hitting an object at the exact point on the car, heading in the exact direction, going the exact speed, with no breaking, with one person in the car weighing the exact weight as the dummy with no luggage in the trunk with the exact tires? Astronomical. Yes, that angle crash happens in 25% of all accidents. But those accidents include every car maker known to man. BMW is but one manufacturer. The question of whether it is a bad day for BMW should be, how many f30 BMWs have had the exact accident where the person sustained sever injuries because of the "mediocre" protection? If the answer is 100%, THEN that's a bad day. If 75% walk away, then that's not so bad. You have to look through the general numbers.
__________________
------------------------------------
2013 328i M-Sport PCD / Estoril Blue II / Aluminum Hex Trim / Estoril Blue Matt / Black Leather / Tech Pkg / HK / Alarm / Xenons
Current Status: She's Home!
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 05:08 PM   #71
adelphi_sky
First Lieutenant
12
Rep
374
Posts

Drives: 2009 BMW 328i Jet Black
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Adelphi, MD

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert View Post
Who drives 60 in their BMW or European cars. In reality most BMW drivers around my area do 80 and the fast drivers are doing 90-100. It's perfectly realistic to say they are able to shave off 60mph from 100 to hit the center divider or a pole at 40. This is a slap across the face on most German cars.
If the person had enough control to point the car at the object head on, wouldn't it be possible that the person could point the car AWAY from the object if they had the time and the control?
__________________
------------------------------------
2013 328i M-Sport PCD / Estoril Blue II / Aluminum Hex Trim / Estoril Blue Matt / Black Leather / Tech Pkg / HK / Alarm / Xenons
Current Status: She's Home!
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 05:26 PM   #72
Robert
Major General
414
Rep
6,968
Posts

Drives: 135i -> is350 -> Tesla M3 perf
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Socal

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by adelphi_sky View Post
If the person had enough control to point the car at the object head on, wouldn't it be possible that the person could point the car AWAY from the object if they had the time and the control?
Accidents are accidents, most of the time we don't get to choose whether to have a collision or not otherwise it won't be called an accident. One of the key deciding factors in my family when we cross shop European and Asian cars are safety. Europeans have a long history of building fun and safe cars. They still do, but Asians have caught up and this particular test exposes a flaw in current design, no need to get defensive about it.
__________________
- There's nothing in my pocket other than knives and lint
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 05:47 PM   #73
Matski
Captain
Matski's Avatar
England
151
Rep
842
Posts

Drives: A slow BMW
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: England

iTrader: (0)

Yup for the purposes of this test the Volvo beat the F30 fair and square, and yes any amount of excuses can be made, but they all apply to the Volvo too. It would be interesting to see the test repeated a few times, and see how consistent the results are.

I would say the only issue of deflection or breakaway wheels being the increased chance of secondary collisions, whether it be you bouncing in to a car doing 60mph head on, or your wheel coming off and paralysing passing school children.
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 06:08 PM   #74
rjc32000
Lieutenant
rjc32000's Avatar
United_States
153
Rep
487
Posts

Drives: 2014 335Xi M Sport 6MT
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Alaska

iTrader: (0)

I think it is more fair to say that it is a bad day for consumer safety; if you check the IIHS website, you will see that this is a new test, does not affect their 2012 Top Safety Award to BMW 3 series, and has not been performed for most new cars. My guess is that many other models will test poorly in this specific and newly designed test as well. Not that "everyone else sucks" is a good defense, but I don't see this as an indictment of BMW but the car industry in general.

The 3 series still gets top ratings for moderate overlap front, side impact, roof safety and rear crash tests, and is still a top safety pick according to IIHS. "It's a terrible day for BMW" is hyperbole.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WJGreer View Post
Agree. This is a poor showing on an important test. It's a terrible day for BMW right now; this isn't good at all.

People on BMW internet forums can rationalize the test result all day long, but it's still a crash test result where BMW performed poorly. Nothing positive about it, unless you count Audi and Mercedes coming in even worse.
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 06:54 PM   #75
simnew
First Lieutenant
104
Rep
310
Posts

Drives: 2018 440i GranCoupe MSport
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London

iTrader: (0)

Acrura and Honda have historically produced some of the worst crash test of any car ever manufactured so I don't really place a great deal of merit on a single test like this.
The F30 is stiffer and stronger than the E90, and passes other tests with flying colours. Maybe there will be adjustments if 'consistent' results show there is a weakness for this type of impact, but until we see more evidence I would take this result with a huge pinch of salt. After all, where were these guys when American cars could not even be fitted with decent headlamps - wasn't that long ago that European cars had to have their halogen headlamps ripped out and replaced with tungsten rubbish just to comply to lighting regulations. Not criticising really - but a sense of perspective is necessary I feel.
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 07:04 PM   #76
Diver
Brigadier General
Diver's Avatar
United_States
504
Rep
3,446
Posts

Drives: Black '12 135i - Sold
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Texas

iTrader: (0)

This looks to me like they designed some test that would be very difficult to justify raising everyone's insurance rates.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 07:35 PM   #77
02fireman
Second Lieutenant
02fireman's Avatar
7
Rep
294
Posts

Drives: Twistys
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Central Fl.

iTrader: (0)

In the years I have been a fireman I have yet to see this type of accident. If a person hit a tree, pole or other object, it almost always included some part of the front crash points. In the case of a tree, pole or other object coming in from the side, they usually crush some part of the A,B,or C pillar, hopefully providing some sort of protection. More importantly, in any crash be it a MINI , BMW, MB, or Dodge ram, against a tree, the tree almost always wins. To me this is a meaningless test and would not stop me from buying a F30 or even other cars on the list.
__________________

Z4M Coupe 6MT Monaco Blue #13/36 ...Keeper...
Z4 3.0 6MT ...Keeper...
2OO2 5MT ...Keeper...
335i 6MT Montego Blue M-Sport (Retired),X535d Vermillion Red/Saddle (Retired)
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 07:45 PM   #78
RPM90
Major General
890
Rep
7,047
Posts

Drives: 340i M-sport AT
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMWrules7 View Post
No. They used to focus on those things. But, then they found that a nice even collision is not anywhere near as catastrophic as one that is offset.

This is a huge blow to BMW. BMW focused on finding a way to give nearly all of the electronic gizmos available on the 7 and the 5 to the
3. Worse, BMW shaved away structural weight in the name of Eco pro and other nonsense.

Now, while it is true your little 4 banger beats the old model's 6, and it's true that the new model goes from 0 to 60 a tad faster, it is equally true that there was a hidden compromise and that was the safety of the BMW occupants.

All you 3 series owners that bought this car before the offset tests were actually performed have been duped! You probably never even asked about safety because BMW goes to great lengths to tout the 3 series as one of the safest cars on earth. But it is not and objective tests prove it is not even close to the safest car in its class.

Look at the intrusion in these tests. It is horrible!!! If I were owner of a 3 series I would be pissed! The fact that this is a new test does not impress me. It only goes to show that BMW makes cars to pass particular set of tests. BMW should worry about the real world.

Driving while texting just got a lot more lethal thanks to BMW.
Your post sounds like someone who just waits to hear something negative about the new 3 so you can attack and criticize the car, and insult the owners.

Duped? Hardly. All car manufacturers build cars to pass crash tests.
Crash tests also give manufacturers data that they can use to make their cars safer. By taking the tests the car shows how well or not it performs in certain types of accidents.

How many people actually make their car purchase decision based on crash testing results?
I guess those who bought an Audi and MB were duped even more?

Plus, this is a new test being implemented, along with the previous tests.
How did the new 3 do on the current test methods?
Also, how long have car companies had to design cars to perform better with this new test?
Those factors are very important to know if one is comparing crash worthiness.

I can easily tell you that I don't look at crash testing results as a factor to which car I buy. I buy based on performance and what I like.
Even though we now know the results of this test, how many are going to sell their 3's because of it?

You: Driving while texting just got a lot more lethal thanks to BMW.

BMW has nothing to do with idiots who text and drive.
Texting while driving is not legal in most states. If an idiot does text and drive, that is in now way BMW's fault.
You're trying to make it sound as if BMW's lackluster performance in this new test is somehow at fault for not properly protecting an idiot who's own actions will cause an accident.
If you apply that kind of logic, then all car makers are at fault for not making 100% crash proof cars for any type of idiotic driving that might cause an accident.

Last edited by RPM90; 08-14-2012 at 08:09 PM..
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 07:47 PM   #79
Robert
Major General
414
Rep
6,968
Posts

Drives: 135i -> is350 -> Tesla M3 perf
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Socal

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by simnew View Post
Acrura and Honda have historically produced some of the worst crash test of any car ever manufactured so I don't really place a great deal of merit on a single test like this.
Maybe a decade ago the Japanese were still lagging behind but they have made great strides in the last decade.

Honda Accord in the past decade
http://www.iihs.org/ratings/ratingsbyseries.aspx?id=276

Acura TL in the past decade
http://www.iihs.org/ratings/ratingsbyseries.aspx?id=436

I believe they probably lucked out in this particular test but I stand to believe they are as safe as European counter parts today.
__________________
- There's nothing in my pocket other than knives and lint
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 08:10 PM   #80
Bimmerlover76
Lieutenant
Bimmerlover76's Avatar
United_States
25
Rep
598
Posts

Drives: 2009 335i Coupe
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Kalamazoo, MI

iTrader: (0)

Lesson: don't crash.
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 08:23 PM   #81
mlhj83
Scythe-Meister
mlhj83's Avatar
United Kingdom
90
Rep
1,053
Posts

Drives: '11 E92 M3 ZCP | F80 M3 CS
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London

iTrader: (0)

Carbon fibre monocell for the next 3 series!
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 09:45 PM   #82
roadmax
Private First Class
5
Rep
138
Posts

Drives: M3 Coupe
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: USA

iTrader: (3)

Kudos to IIHS for making this test that represents a closer reality of crash test.
Also kudos to a to Acura, Volvo and Infiniti.
It appears other carmakers including BMW are caught by surprise on this and how even Mercedes dares to complain of this new test not being fair, is it because they are hurt by this truth.
Should we be happy that BMW came slightly better than Mercedes and Audi, NO.
BMW disappointed because dud not score high where we all expected.
To all their engineers who contributed to this failure the message is: back to the drawing board.
Or perhaps it is not the engineers fault but of those modern smart executives who bring fresh cost cutting ideas that result to inferior cars we get now.
This -MAKE IT CHEAPER- is not just in automotive industry, it is happening in all other fields.
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 10:02 PM   #83
clarence
Lieutenant Colonel
53
Rep
1,544
Posts

Drives: F30 328i M-Sport
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hong Kong

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMWrules7 View Post
But no one is sending a team of people to see why you wrapped your new F30 around a tree.
Sorry but companies such as Volvo, Mercedes, BMW & VAG do employ a team of ppl & they do travel with emergency services to the crash scene. This has been done since the 90's.
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 10:09 PM   #84
clarence
Lieutenant Colonel
53
Rep
1,544
Posts

Drives: F30 328i M-Sport
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hong Kong

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by roadmax View Post
To all their engineers who contributed to this failure the message is: back to the drawing board.
Or perhaps it is not the engineers fault but of those modern smart executives who bring fresh cost cutting ideas that result to inferior cars we get now.
This -MAKE IT CHEAPER- is not just in automotive industry, it is happening in all other fields.
Making it cheaper doesn't necessarily means it's worse in terms of safety.
It depends on where the cuts are.
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 10:10 PM   #85
clarence
Lieutenant Colonel
53
Rep
1,544
Posts

Drives: F30 328i M-Sport
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hong Kong

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert View Post

I believe they probably lucked out in this particular test but I stand to believe they are as safe as European counter parts today.
I think they did cos the Acura TSX didn't score well in the same test.
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 10:22 PM   #86
clarence
Lieutenant Colonel
53
Rep
1,544
Posts

Drives: F30 328i M-Sport
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hong Kong

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matski View Post
I would say the only issue of deflection or breakaway wheels being the increased chance of secondary collisions, whether it be you bouncing in to a car doing 60mph head on, or your wheel coming off and paralysing passing school children.
That is a variable this is not considered in this test. That is also the reason why no test can replicate 100% real world situations.
U can have an accident in a top scoring car & get killed, yet it's also perfectly possible that u survive without a scratch crashing in a deathtrap.
As for the Volvo, an explanation as to why they have this feature is cos there are lots of accidents involving hitting wild animals in Sweden. The way a UK member here hit a deer in his brand new F30 reminded me of this.
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 10:23 PM   #87
Taipei-TT
Captain
24
Rep
642
Posts

Drives: 2014 X3 2.0D
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Canadian in Taipei

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Bus View Post
Stop talking shit. If BMW is doing such a horrible job, what about Lexus, Audi or MB?
I think you are not comparing apples to oranges. The A4 and C are both older cars. When they were being developed, I doubt this test was a huge factor in their design.

It is a blow to BMW that the new F30 cannot pass the test with a "Good" rating with a new chassis.

You can be sure that the new A4 and C, when they are released, will earn a "Good" rating. Hopefully the test does its job..encourage BMW to look at the results and see what they can do to improve safety with the existing F30 chassis.
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2012, 11:33 PM   #88
ptt127
Private
40
Rep
89
Posts

Drives: 2011 335i
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMWrules7 View Post
No. They used to focus on those things. But, then they found that a nice even collision is not anywhere near as catastrophic as one that is offset.

This is a huge blow to BMW. BMW focused on finding a way to give nearly all of the electronic gizmos available on the 7 and the 5 to the
3. Worse, BMW shaved away structural weight in the name of Eco pro and other nonsense.

Now, while it is true your little 4 banger beats the old model's 6, and it's true that the new model goes from 0 to 60 a tad faster, it is equally true that there was a hidden compromise and that was the safety of the BMW occupants.
At first I thought you were at least partly joking, but apparently not. Basically you are implying that by taking weight out of the F30 structure, they have made it less safe than the E90. To support this view you are using the results of a test for which no data exists for the E90, because it hasn't been tested (and probably never will be). Tell me again how you know that the E90 would perform better in this test and therefore is more safe than the F30?

If you look at the tests for which there is data for both models, you'll see that they both scored good in all measures on the front moderate overlap test, they both scored good overall for side impact but while the F30 has an acceptable for torso, the E90 has an acceptable for both torso and pelvis/leg, with all other measures being good for both. In roof strength, the F30 is rated good and the E90 acceptable. I hope they publish the photos/videos from those other tests so that we can compare.

Strength to weight ratio is constantly improving generation to generation for all makes, due to improved design and materials (greater use of high strength steel). Meanwhile, the IIHS keeps coming out with new tests because if every car aces all the current tests and they just call it a day, that doesn't challenge manufacturers to do better and ultimately move safety forward. It's fine for them to do this and I'm sure these manufacturers will respond, but your post is awfully alarmist for what actually happened. Note that while injuries to the left foot, ankle and lower leg were likely and the right leg possible, the risk of significant injuries to other body areas was low.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2012 3 series crash test, 2012 3 series crash test results, 2012 3 series safety, 2012 328i crash test, 2012 328i crash test results, 2012 328i safety, 2012 335i crash test, 2012 335i crash test results, 2012 f30 crash test, 2013 335i safety, 3 series f30, 3 series f30 forum, 3 series forum, bmw 3 series forum, bmw 3-series f30, bmw f30, bmw f30 3-series, bmw f30 forum, crash test f30, crash test f30 3 series, f30 3 series crash test, f30 3 series crash test results, f30 3 series safety, f30 3-series, f30 3-series forum, f30 crash test, f30 crash test iihs, f30 crash test results, f30 forum, f30 forums, f30 iihs, iihs f30, iihs f30 crash test

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 PM.




f30post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST