10-08-2012, 12:59 PM | #89 |
Major
75
Rep 1,037
Posts |
I just read the print version of this review (mag came in the mail a few days ago) and overall, I am less sold on the ATS than before, especially in its current state. also, I wish they would have test driven the Auto transmissions instead of the 6mt as the bimmer 8at is so amazing.
they really do praise the ATS chassis and steering, but engine + tranny goes to bmw. Engines and trannies can always be changed, but the platform and chassis points to maybe an ATS refresh doing very well. Interior is always subjective, so I won't comment there. I am just really disappointed that bmw is not determined to keep its handling / suspension edge over competitors, that gap is closing (or gone, really) with each comparo. I also wish they would put better wheel/tire setups on these "sportline" cars. the caddy came with RE050A-I (which is of course what e90s used to come with), while the f30 came with P7 cinturatos. What a joke!?! sportline, my ass. Put some staggered bridgestones on the bimmer and it prob would have won every performance category, including skid pad and braking. Why so cheap BMW, when you're charging an arm and a leg?
__________________
2014 335i RWD: ZMM, ZDA, ZDH, ZPP, ZTP, 2NH, 2TB, 5DL; Z4A MPPK; AW ext / VB int
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2012, 09:24 PM | #90 |
General
17306
Rep 18,733
Posts |
So I took some time today and looked at the ATS. The car is very impressive as far as exterior styling IMO and looks better than the 328i. The interior of the ATS doesn't look so good in photos, but in person, its pretty nice and is just as luxurious as my E90 (wood trim aside in the E90). I buy a car for the driving experience, not how the interior looks as long as it is functional. I've spec'd an ATS on Caddy's website and a 328i Sport line. Comparatively equipped (base cars with few options) the ATS is $6K less than the BMW. My ATS would be the 2.0 Turbo base car with a MT and sunroof. The 328 Sport line w/bluetooth (amazing it's not standard).
I've not yet driven either car, as the Caddy 2.0 Turbo with MT is as of yet not out in my area. My first physical impressions of the Caddy are quite positive, the driving position seems perfect and the controls proper for good driving (the trunk is a bit small). BMW has gone so far from the original 3-Series formula (from the E30), that I'm not likely to buy a BMW again. The 2.0 turbo in the 3-er is just not right in my experience of owning I6 N/A BMWs. The ATS has no such history, so the 2.0 Turbo in it will get consideration from me. The car I saw was a 2.5L auto, the under hood engineering and assembly are just first-rate IMO; its a very very clean design, very neat and tidy. For a 1st shot out of the box up against the benchmark 3-Series, the ATS is quite impressive. Priced thousands less is only a bonus. I'll have to see how both cars are at 9/10ths on the back roads. I've owned a 3-series since 1988. At this point BMW has its work cut out for it for me not to consider the ATS. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2012, 09:31 PM | #91 | |
Major General
651
Rep 5,803
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
F30 330i Alpine white/Coral red Msport 6MT
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2012, 10:13 PM | #92 |
Brigadier General
194
Rep 3,780
Posts |
Bluetooth is standard in the'13 328.
__________________
'98 Dinan/RMS stage 2+(VAC cams, CES Cutring etc) '15 Buick Regal "T"(wife) '06 Saab 9-5 Combi 5mt (full suspension, LSD, clipped turbo etc) |
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2012, 09:07 AM | #93 |
General
17306
Rep 18,733
Posts |
It makes perfect sense if you remember the crap BMW 4 cylinder engines of the 70s and early 80s and longed for the I6 that BMW finally got right in the E30 in 1988. The ATS has no such heratige to live up to, as it is fresh design. I'll make my own judgement of both engines on my own rather than take an opinion of BMW fanboy whose just read a magazine article.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2012, 09:21 AM | #94 | |
Enlisted Member
5
Rep 38
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2012, 09:24 AM | #95 | |
Major General
651
Rep 5,803
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
F30 330i Alpine white/Coral red Msport 6MT
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2012, 12:37 PM | #97 |
New Member
0
Rep 22
Posts |
@justinnum1
While his tone was just a bit snarky, the message is completely on point. Always trust your own opinions over those on the written page (or coded website). But also, I agree with your point of contention in regards to the different heritage of the ATS and the 3-series. One can't knock the 3 series engine specifically because it's a fourbanger vs the I6 until the differences in respective engines are experienced. Myself, I actually prefer the turbo 4 over the NA 6, as I found the power band to be both stronger and more linear, and those characteristics took precedence over what I felt was a slightly less sophisticated engine feel and note. Some might feel otherwise, but they cannot just fall in line with assumptions based specifically on specs. That being said, I look forward to test driving an ATS asap to compare the engine to the BMW four. It looks like it was a great first effort by GM, which is only bested by an engine that is generally recognized as the best turbo 4 in the world, by a company with a lot more experience in creating great small-ish displacement turbo engines. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2012, 02:04 PM | #98 |
Major General
651
Rep 5,803
Posts |
Opinions are opinions. But a dyno is fact. Based on dyno of both 2.0t. BMW>ats. Loom forward to hearing more people's reviews of the ats.
__________________
F30 330i Alpine white/Coral red Msport 6MT
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2012, 02:18 PM | #99 | |
Major General
4463
Rep 9,160
Posts |
Quote:
I'm not arguing the benefit of a straight six to a four cylinder, but using the E30 as your reference seems odd. Next you'll be extolling the V12 E Type. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2012, 02:42 PM | #100 |
Brigadier General
1588
Rep 4,553
Posts |
There is no arguing that BMW has another 3 series competitor in the ATS. Yes, its first gen, is from GM, and has that chiseled body many don't love. But, at the end of the day it drives really well and its engines are competitive. The auto rags were all very complementary, except for the CUE system, touch controls, E46 era rear legroom and trunk narrowing @ wheel wells.
I was very impressed with the car drive, feel and driving position. There were a few items I thought were cheaply made, like the fake stitching on things like the door panels. Also the rear legroom is further restricted by a bulge in the unibody structure. I found that pretty strange. If GM markets it properly, offers attractive leasing options, and corrects some of the CUE software problems, they could have a respectable showing in this first gen. We may have a reborn GM on our hands and I'm cautiously optimistic that the future is looking bright for American cars. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2012, 05:51 PM | #101 |
Lucky13
211
Rep 1,762
Posts |
Short and selective memory from Efthreeoh, guess he wasn't around for the Cadillac Cimarron. Yes Cadillac has heritage from the same time period as mentioned for BMW but it was embarrassing. If he read the Car and Driver article as I did it says clearly that the ATS engine is crap compared to the BMW.
__________________
1995 325i, 1996 328ci, 1997 528i, 1997 Z3 2.8, 2000 528i, 2001 X5 3.0, 2001 330i Convertible, 2002 M3 Convertible, 2003 M3 Coupe, 2004 M3 Coupe, 2004 Z4 3.0, 2004 X3 3.0, 2007 X3 3.0, 2007 335i Convertible, 2013 X1 28 sdrive, 2014 M235 manual, 2020 X3 30i Xdrive
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2012, 07:59 PM | #102 | |
Lieutenant
35
Rep 430
Posts |
Quote:
*Plenty of them*, I rest my case. Not to be offending but if you would have gotten the 335i first, you probably wouldn't require a performance exhaust... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2012, 09:24 PM | #103 | |
General
17306
Rep 18,733
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2012, 09:37 PM | #104 | |
General
17306
Rep 18,733
Posts |
Quote:
BMW has been continiously selling in the USA the 3 series with an N/A I6 for the last 25 years. The 3 series has always been a sports sedan since day one. The cavilier was Cadillac's attempt at a luxury economy car when gas was the equivelent of $4.50 a gallon in the 1980s. The ATS is a clean-sheet sports sedan with no heritage; it's that simple. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2012, 09:51 PM | #105 | |
Major General
651
Rep 5,803
Posts |
Quote:
There is a lot more to an engine than how it sounds.
__________________
F30 330i Alpine white/Coral red Msport 6MT
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2012, 10:06 PM | #106 |
Anti-Fanboy
68
Rep 572
Posts |
It's a sad day for BMW. Despite the misgivings regarding the powertrain, the ATS is the more appealing car, especially exterior-wise. The only reason I could never consider the ATS seriously, is the fact that the 3.6L simply cannot touch BMW's N54/N55 and it's not available with a manual transmission. HOWEVER, the V6 and V8 families are due for a redesign (starting with the Gen V small block V8 in the C7 Corvette).
If they offer the ATS-V with the next-gen small block V8 + manual transmission. I could honestly stop lusting after the M3. In fact, GM if you're reading this ... don't go the turbocharged V6 route. The smallblock V8 is by far the best V8 in the world when considering efficiency, packaging, cost, and power. Build the ATS-V with the new V8 + manual transmission, and I think you will give current M3 owners something to look at for much cheaper $$$. "Build it and they will come" |
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2012, 10:12 PM | #107 | |
Major General
651
Rep 5,803
Posts |
Quote:
Exterior? Thats totally subjective, some will like it, some won't. Both transmissions in the ATS have been said to be poor. The suspension is better than the F30's and both engines are said to be not as good as bmw's offerings.
__________________
F30 330i Alpine white/Coral red Msport 6MT
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-09-2012, 10:25 PM | #108 | |
Anti-Fanboy
68
Rep 572
Posts |
Quote:
I concede that BMW builds better 4 and 6 cylinders (especially 6 cylinders) than GM's equivalent offerings in the ATS. However, GM makes the best V8s, and I hope that the next ATS-V will come with the new Gen V SBC V8. To date, no manufacturer has built better V8s in the last 50 years. Heck, give me the ATS, toss the 3.6L and put in the LS1 V8. This V8 is over 15 years old (debut in C5 Corvette for the '97 model year), and even in stock form will match BMW's N54/N55 offerings, with much lower cost of ownership and a lot more aftermarket support. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-10-2012, 07:30 AM | #109 | |
Brigadier General
194
Rep 3,780
Posts |
Quote:
Perhaps you are completely wrong and all it takes is looking at my signature. I have no interest in a 2nd BMW with a forced induction straight 6. There is nothing the N55 could give me that I am not getting in spades with my 400whp(more coming as I up the boost after a headgasket and retune) S52 in a car slightly larger than a Miata. I had a 2.0Tsi 6mt Vw CC stage 2 as my DD. The F30 with RWD but similar architecture was an ideal replacement for that car. Could not be any happier with my current stable. Was not about money or all out speed out of the box, if that was the case I would have likely gone used and gotten something more. If I had only one car, one car to do it all, yeah I would have not opted for the N20 F30.
__________________
'98 Dinan/RMS stage 2+(VAC cams, CES Cutring etc) '15 Buick Regal "T"(wife) '06 Saab 9-5 Combi 5mt (full suspension, LSD, clipped turbo etc) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-10-2012, 07:36 AM | #110 | |
Brigadier General
194
Rep 3,780
Posts |
Quote:
But then comes the M-Sport. I am sorry, but if you have not seen one in the flesh, it is a drastic improvement and makes no apologies compared to an any E90. All subjective of course. But fact is, most have not seen an F30 M-Sport in person, also seen one in EB2.
__________________
'98 Dinan/RMS stage 2+(VAC cams, CES Cutring etc) '15 Buick Regal "T"(wife) '06 Saab 9-5 Combi 5mt (full suspension, LSD, clipped turbo etc) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|