06-21-2016, 03:54 PM | #1 |
Enlisted Member
8
Rep 40
Posts
Drives: 2011 x-3 28i x-dr, 2012 335i
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: longview, texas
|
AM radio sensitivity deteriorating
2012 335i, CIC-hi ( has nav )...FM, Satellite-Sirius, and weather band
all still good.. deaf as a stump on am broadcast band, lately...only a couple weeks left on warranty.. will dealer retro-fit NBT? wishful thinking, i'm sure... gotta get my Rush fix on my lunch hour... regards, dan |
06-21-2016, 07:03 PM | #3 |
New Member
0
Rep 10
Posts |
AM
The radio in my old '13 periodically lost the AM. My new '15 (8 months old) hasnt done it yet. The dealer told me the Sirius radios do this. No ide why.
Tony |
Appreciate
0
|
06-21-2016, 08:16 PM | #4 |
Brigadier General
2413
Rep 4,448
Posts
Drives: '23 X1 28i xDrive
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Philly
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-22-2016, 03:30 PM | #5 |
Major General
890
Rep 7,047
Posts |
The AM/FM radio reception in modern BMW's is abysmal.
FM-HD actually sounds pretty darn good, a good bit better than satellite. The problem is that FM-HD goes in and out constantly and that makes for an awful listening experience as the fidelity changes along with skipping at times. I only live about 40 miles from Chicago, which has plenty of FM-HD stations. But not a single one of those stations stays tuned in this BMW HK head unit. My 2013 F30 335i was just as bad as my 2016 340i. The "antennas" in these cars SUCKS big time! I think BMW figures you'll either listen to satellite or your own digital device and so they give us the cheapest AM/FM tuner and antenna they can to saves a few bucks. It actually pisses me off because as I said FM-HD actually sounds really good especially on the HK audio system, but only for the few seconds or minute of so of when the actual HD signal is being held. We should all complain to our dealer tech departments and have BMW fix this reception issue. I don't live in some mountain valley 100 miles away from the nearest FM-HD station, but my HK radio operates like I do. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-22-2016, 03:39 PM | #6 | |
Brigadier General
2253
Rep 3,622
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
BMW CCA Member #516012
2016 340i, Estoril Blue, Manual Transmission, MPE, MPBBK, HRE FF04 Instagram: @brandons340i |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-22-2016, 05:01 PM | #7 |
Enlisted Member
8
Rep 40
Posts
Drives: 2011 x-3 28i x-dr, 2012 335i
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: longview, texas
|
a similar ( i think? ) CIC-hi unit in my 2011 X-3 works reasonably well on the AM band..
just saying... |
Appreciate
0
|
06-22-2016, 05:06 PM | #8 |
Brigadier General
2413
Rep 4,448
Posts
Drives: '23 X1 28i xDrive
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Philly
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-22-2016, 05:12 PM | #9 |
Brigadier General
2253
Rep 3,622
Posts |
Nope not all. If it ain't broke don't fix it. But honestly it's less about being progressive and more about who pays to get the rights to do the broadcast.
__________________
BMW CCA Member #516012
2016 340i, Estoril Blue, Manual Transmission, MPE, MPBBK, HRE FF04 Instagram: @brandons340i |
Appreciate
0
|
06-23-2016, 12:21 AM | #10 |
Banned
354
Rep 1,986
Posts |
BMW took the AM Radios out if their electric i Models completely. Claimed there was too much interference. The NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) got a group of Broadcast Engineers together that offered to help them solve the issue at no cost, but BMW turned them down.
So you can easily see how important AM radio is to BMW. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-23-2016, 06:11 AM | #11 |
Brigadier General
2413
Rep 4,448
Posts
Drives: '23 X1 28i xDrive
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Philly
|
Sports radio continuing to broadcast over AM signal in 2016 is "broken". Time for them to move to the modern age--or at least an age that's less antiquated.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-23-2016, 08:32 AM | #12 | |
Lieutenant
147
Rep 477
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
|
06-23-2016, 08:47 AM | #13 |
Major General
1835
Rep 6,990
Posts
Drives: 15 F80 M3, 22 G01 X3 30i
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clayton, NC
|
I haven't listened to AM radio since the 1970s, since there's so much better reception and content on FM. That said, AM radio needs a better antenna, not a better head unit. All this "bad reception" is due to the fact that today's car antennas, many of which are in the rear window along with the defrost elements, aren't tuned correctly for AM. Those of you who can remember the good ol' days when cars had long (and sometimes retractable) antennas in their front or rear fenders know that when the antenna was down too low or cut too short, it minimized reception.
So what about "portable" radios (if you can find one)? They're generally stationary, and aren't affected by short or horizontally-aligned antennas. If you're just bug-nuts for AM radio, consider adding one of those antennas you see on the BMW soft-top convertibles.
__________________
2015 F80 ///M3 Sedan 7DCT Tanzanite, 2022 X3 sDrive30i 8AT Brooklyn Grey |
Appreciate
1
|
06-23-2016, 08:54 AM | #14 | |
Brigadier General
2413
Rep 4,448
Posts
Drives: '23 X1 28i xDrive
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Philly
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-23-2016, 09:19 AM | #15 | |
Lieutenant
147
Rep 477
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-23-2016, 09:45 AM | #16 | |
Brigadier General
2253
Rep 3,622
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
BMW CCA Member #516012
2016 340i, Estoril Blue, Manual Transmission, MPE, MPBBK, HRE FF04 Instagram: @brandons340i |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-23-2016, 12:08 PM | #17 | |
Brigadier General
2413
Rep 4,448
Posts
Drives: '23 X1 28i xDrive
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Philly
|
Quote:
http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/201...ports-radio-fm ...and in your city... http://www.957thegame.com/ Last edited by tex2670; 06-23-2016 at 02:33 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-23-2016, 12:23 PM | #18 |
Major General
1835
Rep 6,990
Posts
Drives: 15 F80 M3, 22 G01 X3 30i
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clayton, NC
|
No, that's reserved for '72 Ford Pickups...
__________________
2015 F80 ///M3 Sedan 7DCT Tanzanite, 2022 X3 sDrive30i 8AT Brooklyn Grey |
Appreciate
1
|
06-23-2016, 12:34 PM | #19 | |
Major General
1835
Rep 6,990
Posts
Drives: 15 F80 M3, 22 G01 X3 30i
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clayton, NC
|
Quote:
Unlike FM radio signal spread, which is primarily point-to-point, AM radio is sensitive to atmospheric conditions and also can "skip" off the atmosphere, which is why you can listen to a Chicago radio station like WLS from Fort Polk, Louisiana after the sun goes down. I used to listen to Oklahoma City from New Mexico at night, but couldn't get any reception during the day. How's your AM reception at night? Any better than during the day or the same? Long-wave radio is what "HAM" radio operators use to talk to other operators around the world. FM radio requires "repeaters" to reach beyond the horizon from wherever its origination point is. It's more than likely the nature of AM radio, rather than BMW's antenna design, that's causing the issue. If you really feel there are other areas where BMW "comes up short", you should probably consider buying another brand. But be prepared to be even more disappointed.
__________________
2015 F80 ///M3 Sedan 7DCT Tanzanite, 2022 X3 sDrive30i 8AT Brooklyn Grey Last edited by RoundelM3; 06-23-2016 at 12:40 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
1
|
06-24-2016, 01:21 AM | #20 | |
Banned
354
Rep 1,986
Posts |
Quote:
The problem with AM is 1) companies are using crappy AM tuners and circuits in their receivers as they believe as some have posted above that no one cares about it anymore. Has literally NOTHING to do with the BMW Antenna. 2) spectrum noise has increased to levels causing issues in many bands, but it is out of control on AM due to everything from computer processors not shielded properly to AC Dimmers in a house. As noted, BMW gave up on AM radio in the i Series because of the interference the cars give off Just the week the FCC has brought up the idea of a massive study to get good numbers on what the noise floor is across the Spectrum as EVERYONE (and I mean all Companies) have gotten concerned with the Spectral Pollution that is encroaching on so many bands now. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-24-2016, 01:31 AM | #21 |
Banned
354
Rep 1,986
Posts |
Anyone interested in the FCC action this week should read both of the following:
http://www.tvtechnology.com/news/000...e-floor/278840 http://www.radioworld.com/article/fc...-issues/279077 WASHINGTON—There are great anecdotes about people who hear radio broadcasts through their dental work. That’s “noise,” in radio frequency parlance. Noise is comprised of undesired signals. The sum of all noise from undesired signals is called the “noise floor,” and people who advise the Federal Communications Commission on technology matters suspect it’s rising. They’ve asked the commission to help them look into it. “Like many spectrum users we believe that the noise floor in the radio spectrum is rising as the number of devices in use that emit radio energy grows,” the FCC’s Technical Advisory Council said in a June 6 correspondence to the commission. The TAC, a collection of executives and academics from the likes of Google, the National Association of Broadcasters, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, MIT, Verizon, Motorola and others,asked the commission to open an inquiry on the noise floor because of the limited amount of information available to study it. “In search for concrete evidence of increased noise floors, we have found limited available quantitative data to support this belief,” the TAC letter stated. “We are looking to find ways to add to the available data in order to answer important questions for the FCC regarding this topic.” The commission agreed to open a public inquiry into the matter in a June 15 Public Notice that called for comments by Aug. 11, 2016 on Docket No. 16-191. Finding the noise floor is complicated by a number of factors. RF noise is generated by all types of devices, including those not necessarily designed to do so. These are referred to as “incidental radiators.” Electric motors, dimmer switches, utility transformers and power lines are examples of incidental radiators, and they are not subject to RF noise rules. Then there also are "unintentional radiators,” which use RF energy internally—through wiring, for example—but that “leak” it because RF energy has boundary issues. A third type of radiators covers equipment designed to intentionally emit RF energy, including cellphones, TV sets, wireless routers, Bluetooth devices, radios, radar, microwave ovens, fluorescent lights, arc welders, etc. These are considered “unlicensed intentional radiators,” “industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) radiators” and “licensed radiators.” This last type of radiator typically transmits on an assigned frequency, but, as with unintentional radiators, the energy leaks into adjacent frequencies and sometimes beyond. The commission’s inquiry comprises a list of questions proffered by the TAC, beginning with, “Is there a noise problem?” Interested parties can file comments in the FCC’s Electronic Comment Filing System portal, using Proceeding Number 16-191, by Aug. 11, 2016. No reply comment date was set. Last edited by Kabrich; 06-24-2016 at 01:41 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-24-2016, 08:35 AM | #22 | ||
Second Lieutenant
21
Rep 208
Posts
Drives: 2018 640i GT/2017 X5 40e
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Castle Rock, CO
|
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|