03-04-2014, 09:55 AM | #24 | |
General
8566
Rep 19,982
Posts
Drives: 911, Cayenne Turbo, Disco 4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Crieff, Perthshire, Scotland
|
Quote:
Also, note that Alpina have a xdrive F30 models and they do not have a raised ride height, so it clearly is feasible from a technical perspective, and I doubt they've done much more from a mechanical perspective than fir lower springs and better dampers. They may have been able to adapt the xdrive ECU though, which would deal with Highland Pete's thoughts perhaps.
__________________
Current: Porsche 911 991 C4S, Porsche Cayenne Turbo, Land Rover Discovery 4. Gone...G01 X3 M40i, Cayman S 987, F31 340i, Cayman GT4, F82 M4 CP, Lotus Exige V6, G20 330e, F30 330e, Boxster S 987, F31 335d, Mini Cooper SD, E89 Z4, E90 330d 320d, E60 520d, E46 330d 320d, MX5s, E30 325i
Last edited by Tengocity; 03-04-2014 at 11:23 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-04-2014, 10:02 AM | #25 |
First Lieutenant
36
Rep 385
Posts |
Now I've got my 335d and had it on a ramp, I see no harm in all at fitting the full 330d S drive set up to it. I'd be willing to be BMW wouldn't even notice.
The ride in the 335d is far better than the 330d S drive I had on loan though for what I do. So I won't be changing it.
__________________
Current:
Range Rover Sport - Alpina D3 Bi Turbo |
Appreciate
0
|
03-04-2014, 10:10 AM | #26 | |
Major General
706
Rep 5,021
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Previous: Superman 330d sDrive M Sport + Toys
Present: Red Tornado Golf 7R 5 Dr, DSG + Toys |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-04-2014, 10:13 AM | #27 | |
First Lieutenant
36
Rep 385
Posts |
Quote:
Sadly the masses equate hard to equal sporty. I've driven more forgiving race cars than M sports. 20mm X drive ARB's versus 24.6mm M sport ARB's play a lot in the roll stakes.
__________________
Current:
Range Rover Sport - Alpina D3 Bi Turbo |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-04-2014, 11:35 AM | #28 | |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
Quote:
You would think BMW would have offered the same M-Sport suspension package in the 335d xDrive, if it was simply just fitting it. Particularly as in the UK the 335d is the most sought after performance 3-series. Would appear it is a case of fitting the 330/335d engines in an already developed xDrive chassis, (all markets) rather than take it one step further. Alpina on the other hand, will 'out of the box' develop their own chassis characteristics, xDrive (we imagine) is an integral part of that honed chassis. Alpina typically have a more 'supple' set of working parameters, may be a lowered chassis, but still retains more suspension compliance than the typical M-Sport settings. As Waitey says, we don't have to "equate hard to equal sporty", maybe a firmer ride/handling package just doesn't add anything to the real performance. Perhaps Alpina have been left to fill the small niche of offering the sportiest xDrive 3-series at present. HighlandPete |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-04-2014, 04:49 PM | #29 |
Private
4
Rep 53
Posts |
Hi guys, I have spoken to hartge, h&r & eibach, they all have specific springs for the 335d lowering around 25mm... Perfect! I have also spoken to Kevin Bird BMW specialist who has a demo car already done albeit a f32. Anyway, I'm going tomw to seem them with a view to getting booked in ASAP! Boom! Lol
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-04-2014, 04:54 PM | #30 | |
General
8566
Rep 19,982
Posts
Drives: 911, Cayenne Turbo, Disco 4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Crieff, Perthshire, Scotland
|
Quote:
__________________
Current: Porsche 911 991 C4S, Porsche Cayenne Turbo, Land Rover Discovery 4. Gone...G01 X3 M40i, Cayman S 987, F31 340i, Cayman GT4, F82 M4 CP, Lotus Exige V6, G20 330e, F30 330e, Boxster S 987, F31 335d, Mini Cooper SD, E89 Z4, E90 330d 320d, E60 520d, E46 330d 320d, MX5s, E30 325i
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-04-2014, 05:01 PM | #31 |
Private
4
Rep 53
Posts |
We'll I'll find out more tomw and let you know, I spoke to Kevin and he gives a 3 year warranty, he assured me of no issues whatsoever with the 335d, I'll take before and after pics anyway and let you all know, I'm only after a subtle drop do bring inline with my previous e92 335d, looks so much better! I really can't see it affecting traction etc, but I'm willing to try anyway, worse case scenario is I swop it back but can't see that happening!! Exciting eh!!?
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-04-2014, 05:10 PM | #32 |
General
8566
Rep 19,982
Posts
Drives: 911, Cayenne Turbo, Disco 4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Crieff, Perthshire, Scotland
|
Exciting indeed! Good to see when people actually do the mods rather than just talk about them! (like me)
If I do it then I would probs do the ARBs at the same time and hopefully save a little labour costs. That change involves dropping both front and rear subframes, so takes a bit of time. However I do think it could add a little extra turn in agility. Not worth doing if it is just the cosmetic change one is after though!
__________________
Current: Porsche 911 991 C4S, Porsche Cayenne Turbo, Land Rover Discovery 4. Gone...G01 X3 M40i, Cayman S 987, F31 340i, Cayman GT4, F82 M4 CP, Lotus Exige V6, G20 330e, F30 330e, Boxster S 987, F31 335d, Mini Cooper SD, E89 Z4, E90 330d 320d, E60 520d, E46 330d 320d, MX5s, E30 325i
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-04-2014, 05:20 PM | #33 | |
-
290
Rep 2,598
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-04-2014, 05:22 PM | #34 | |
-
290
Rep 2,598
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-05-2014, 01:26 AM | #35 | |
Lieutenant General
3531
Rep 11,292
Posts |
Quote:
So, how much will this cost to lower it?
__________________
Current: Golf R Mk8Previous: Golf R Mk7.5 Mercedes AMG C63 S Coupe F80 M3 Competition Pack |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-05-2014, 01:30 AM | #36 |
Private
4
Rep 53
Posts |
Hi Guys, yep I've had the opinion of several BMW specialists who have been In business for decades, as I said in an earlier thread also, I done 2k miles through France with 400kg of load in my car, it performed faultlessly even with a very heavy right foot! The wheels were under the arches it was that low so I personally cannot see an issue with dropping around 25mm. The system is clearly designed to be used at all angles of travel by bmw.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-05-2014, 02:51 AM | #38 |
Captain
255
Rep 816
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-05-2014, 03:52 AM | #39 |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-05-2014, 04:18 AM | #40 | |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
Quote:
My comments in earlier posts are more to the xDrive capability and sensitivity. If I put on my engineering "R&D hat" and imagine being given this problem as a design study, I'd not just be looking at the integrity of the mechanical function. As you guys are buying into xDrive for the xDrive capabilities, what is happening to xDrive function with a lowered and stiffer chassis? I'd be starting with what is happening at software level and how a lightly loaded car, (just the driver) effects the weight transfer around the car and front to rear drive ratio, in all the conditions BMW have tested and honed the software to suit. I don't know the answer, I'm sure your average 'specialist' hasn't any data either. Probably hasn't even thought to test or address any differences in the xDrive performance across a wide range of parameters. If they have, then they'll have some data to pursue and study, to see where there are changes. They'll have a tested baseline and be mapping the variations around the BMW designed benchmark. xDrive isn't like a simple RWD layout, where you have only two wheels to sort the grip. Guys like Kevin Bird clearly know how RWD is best sorted, which includes careful honing of spring, damping and ARB rates, or grip is compromised. I wonder if that expertise has been gained for xDrive, or are we still all in a learning curve? I'd love to see some serious data gathered from track testing "before and after", to see whether it does change how xDrive works in various conditions such as aggressive cornering, on and off the throttle, slalom manoeuvres, etc. etc. Interesting subject from my engineering perspective. HighlandPete |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-05-2014, 06:21 AM | #41 |
Lieutenant General
3531
Rep 11,292
Posts |
Also, how does lowering affect the active dampers? A lot of people come on here and say "its makes no difference" - but on what evidence? No doubt BMW have designed the active dampers to work for the range of the current spring height and rate? Or maybe 20-25mm drop really does make no difference?
__________________
Current: Golf R Mk8Previous: Golf R Mk7.5 Mercedes AMG C63 S Coupe F80 M3 Competition Pack |
Appreciate
0
|
03-05-2014, 06:28 AM | #42 |
First Lieutenant
36
Rep 385
Posts |
I won't lower an adaptive system on an X drive, without fitting the adaptive dampers from a S drive.
__________________
Current:
Range Rover Sport - Alpina D3 Bi Turbo |
Appreciate
0
|
03-05-2014, 06:57 AM | #43 | |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
Quote:
Can go the other way, a product gets rubbished when users go beyond the design parameters. I fitted Koni FSD dampers to my E91, they worked as described by Koni on my stock suspension. The solution I was after. I know other users rubbished them for not working, or having odd characteristics... wearing fast, even leaking... why? They wanted more from the product, the refined ride and tighter handling, but were adding lowered springs, even hitting the bump stops. No wonder they didn't work correctly, as they were not designed to work on short, restricted stroke applications. Koni were quite specific on their limitations, wasn't the product at fault, but a "user adapted" application. HighlandPete |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-05-2014, 07:11 AM | #44 |
Lieutenant General
3531
Rep 11,292
Posts |
My guess that changing springs in an xdrive will probably have no obvious detrimental affect in the short term. But long term? Who knows. Depends on how long you want to keep the car or how many miles you do.
__________________
Current: Golf R Mk8Previous: Golf R Mk7.5 Mercedes AMG C63 S Coupe F80 M3 Competition Pack |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|