View Single Post
      11-07-2019, 03:54 PM   #104
Eriphill
Captain
1223
Rep
939
Posts

Drives: 340i
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Down by the sea

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan_COLD View Post
And that's still not "working for" Joe. My point stands. Hell, he didn't even really "work for" Rice. He "worked for" the Director of the CIA.

Even if it turns out to be Ciaramella, so what? The whistleblower could literally be Hillary Clinton and it wouldn't matter. Every bit of testimony that has been released, every opening statement, it's all backed up the concerns detailed in the "whistleblower" report.
Hahaha that first paragraph is so purposely obtuse it's not worth replying to. And no none of the testimony has even remotely proved the fake whistleblowers false claims. The select leaks from the Democrats did appear to lend credence to it, but the FULL transcripts show it all to be BS.
Torgus2048.00