View Single Post
      03-11-2013, 11:51 PM   #9
Anonymous Henchman #5
Enlisted Member
1
Rep
30
Posts

Drives: 335i M-sport MT EBII
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: California Central Valley

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackson743 View Post
Can we just have the usual 335i vs. 328i in-fight?

And, you're logic is flawed. If your driving 75% highway, you're not going to see much difference between AT vs. the MT.

As far as MPG goes for a person that is on the highway 75% of the time, the type of transmission is mostly a distinction without much a difference.
You claim my logic is flawed but you just unintentionally contradicted yourself by supporting the entire basis of my argument.

In essence, I'm saying the mpg difference for the 335 MT and AT is minimal, yet BMW says otherwise.

You said, " if [you're] driving 75% highway, you're not going to see much difference between AT vs. the MT." That's exactly my point!!! So then why does BMW say my MT will get 3 mpg less (30 vs. 33 for hwy)?

Also, I hate to reiterate myself, but your argument doesn't account for all the other variety of driving conditions of 335 owners that I alluded to (such as in Fuelly). Surely some of them do more city driving.
Appreciate 0