View Single Post
      03-14-2013, 10:11 AM   #118
bradleyland
TIM YOYO
United_States
1504
Rep
3,283
Posts

Drives: 2013 M3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamS View Post
Negative. People are cheap. Even when spending $40K on a car, some people get really annoyed that a $2K navigation is more expensive and has less features than their $200 smart phone. So they refuse to pay. And BMW can't give away Nav "for free" on a $40K car, so they let people pay the premium. When you get into the $70K base price, then there is enough margin to include it for free.
Navigation systems are a huge money maker for auto manufacturers. They're one of the most profitable options available in a car. BMW could definitely afford to reduce the price, but why would they? The market bears the cost. The argument that there's not enough margin to fit a nav system by default is pretty weak though. It'd require a price bump, but no where near $2k.
__________________
His: 2019 R1250GS - Black
Hers: 2013 X3 28i - N20 Mineral Silver / Sand Beige / Premium, Tech
Past: 2013 ///M3 - Interlagos Blue Black M-DCT
Past: 2010 135i - TiAg Coral Red 6MT ///M-Sport
Appreciate 0