Quote:
Originally Posted by boostm3
Here's how biased C&D has become.. Note this excerpt from their Ride Sharing article in the same issue:
"Both the M240i and the M2 return by right of having made 10Best last year, and their appeal remains compelling. The similarities between the models get close to confusing; both wear M badges, although the M240i is the lesser M Performance line rather than a true single integer M car, and both are powered by turbocharged 3 liter inline six engines turning (at least) their rear wheels. As such, the $8200 upcharge for the M2 ($54,495, unoptioned) looks at first sight like some kind of outrageous M tax )
I just went to bmwusa.com to equip an '18 m240i similarly to how the M2 comes equipped 'unoptioned'.. Instead of an upcharge, the M2 is over $1000 LESS.. Now which has the 'upcharge'? Whether its bias or fake news, its wrong. The M2 is a good value, period.
|
You need to post the whole article because that sentence is very out of context. Its setting up the point that while the m240i and m2 are both RWD 2 series powered by n55, the m2 is over $8k more. It can be easy to see that $8k as an outrageous M tax.......
BUT after driving the car you realize they are leagues apart. M2 having the m3 underpinnings w/ LSD, more power, more cooling, better suspension, wider track width and tires, as well as lots of cool exterior and interior styling details to set it apart.