Quote:
Originally Posted by pdegene
The cheeseburger reference was a joke and shouldn't have been taken so literally. That was my cheeky way of saying that even though it's clearly my fault, you can still be held accountable for reducing the brightness of a safety feature. Perhaps you should search Google for examples of such incidents before claiming that it's not an issue.
|
I understand that you were joking. I was carrying the analogy along to make the point that just because tail lights are tinted even at the lightest tint, doesn't give everyone else a free pass if they end up rear ending the tinted car. That's ludicrous and some of your anecdotal google stories would have other factors involved. The facts are that the law requires light to be visible at a certain distance. It does not require that the tail lights be 100% free of tint. That is factually incorrect. That's all I was saying.