Quote:
Originally Posted by FaRKle!
Slightly unrelated, but I was curious to see how your performance changed after switching to ATM. Your previous data showed 100-200kph for CSF was 12.43s. After the swap to ATM that dropped to 12.2s? Nice.
4.2-4.3s is significantly faster than the 4.75s 0-100 you had before.
What tires are you running and what tires are the other vehicles that have lower times running?
|
It was night and day honestly vs. CSF. I got even better times up top - 12.2 vs 12.4 and there is very little additional lag down low. There is some, but not much. 0-100 was definitely better by 0.4-0.5 and was basically identical to what I had with stock IC. That is with LC engaged of course. Without, it was also quite similiar around 5s z 5.4-5.5 (if I recall correctly) of CSF.
So yes, ATM is by far better than CSF in my experience. Even the guy who swapped it in shop and drove it with me said there was a "huge turbo hole" down low. On the other hand - when I talked with Imran from Evolve, he said CSF always makes cars faster. Maybe I got a bad unit or something - I guess I will never know
.
For tires - I don't think you can get much better - I have MPS4s - classic staggered 19s 225 r19 top 255 r19 back. And I have lighter aftermarket wheels - not forged, but the next best thing (OZ leggera). I don't detect any slippage at any time during the acceleration. And if there was slippage due to tires, I think you would see it in 0-100 not 100-200. 0-100 I have in line, 100-200 is the issue