View Single Post
      09-23-2016, 02:57 PM   #34
GPM
Second Lieutenant
175
Rep
210
Posts

Drives: 2015 335i
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Arizona

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiago@VRSF View Post
Looks like it's vastly different in diameter alone. Issues with intakes on MAF cars are due to the diameter of the tubing used, not the general shape of the surrounding area.
Tiago,

It appears you are going out of your way to criticize another manufacturer's product. First you stated that the stock MAF housing wasn't shaped the way CTS Turbo claimed. Then, when that was shown to not be the case you claim that the MAF housing is vastly different in diameter, even though the only person to compare the two so far said they are pretty much identical.

As someone who purchased your charge pipe shortly after it was introduced, and who also posted the solution for the issue with the vacuum connection not fitting properly, I have to wonder why you are choosing to criticize the CTS Turbo product before anyone has had any hands on experience yet.

If you have purchased one of the CTS Turbo intakes and have found a problem with the product, some firsthand experience would of course be appreciated.
__________________
Mineral Gray - Active Autowerke Stage 2 - MPerformance Suspension - VRSF CP - CTS Turbo IC - Catted Fabspeed - Akrapovic - HRE FF15
Appreciate 3
FSociety3810.00
ali820271.50