04-01-2024, 09:08 AM | #4093 | |
Captain
518
Rep 971
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Dustin Braun @ Braun Performance Tuning
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2024, 12:45 PM | #4094 |
Registered
0
Rep 3
Posts |
Thanks for the review! Today I went for another log read and noticed that there were more corrections and one knock.
Outside temp was around 20'C. Mind taking a look? I am having a dyno wisit this week to see what numbers the car is making and would like to be safe. https://bootmod3.net/log?id=660ac1661aaf1446a0d46bae Much appreciated. This community rocks. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2024, 01:45 PM | #4095 | |
Second Lieutenant
110
Rep 241
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
M140i - MHD Stage 2+ E40 - XHP Stage 3 - Catless DP - TU HPFP - MP LSD - MP Exhaust - Endless ME20 brakepads w/ Castrol SRF fluid - Bilstein B12 - Millway solid rear subframe bushings - Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2024, 07:43 AM | #4096 |
Registered
0
Rep 3
Posts |
Thanks, what are the things that could become bad once outside temps increase? At what point the timing corrections become unacceptable? once they are not able to recover in time? Sorry if this is an obvious question that has been answered here 100 times, I am still going through the whole post history.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2024, 01:29 PM | #4097 |
Second Lieutenant
355
Rep 214
Posts |
A question that i ask me is, on which value i can see, that for instance my downpipe is my bottleneck?
Perhaps I know from experience, that a 300 cell downpipe is usable for like 500 horsepower. But on which values can I see that? |
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2024, 02:57 AM | #4098 |
Brigadier General
1980
Rep 3,988
Posts |
You cannot see that in a log. Hypothetically you could track calculated exhaust temperature etc. and derive from there, but you have no datum to compare to and there are multiple variables which will influence it.
In general - the downpipe is and will always be your exhaust bottleneck. Simple as that. And please do not refer to cells - cells are like megapixels - marketing term only. You may have higher flow-resistance from a specific 200 cell than from a 300 cell. It all comes down to the specific product and its condition.
__________________
"Large increases in cost with questionable increases in performance can be tolerated only in cars and women."
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2024, 03:03 AM | #4099 | |
Brigadier General
1980
Rep 3,988
Posts |
Quote:
You will naturally start seeing heavier timing corrections. There is no black or white point which can be defined in a sentence. One needs to look at the big picture of things.
__________________
"Large increases in cost with questionable increases in performance can be tolerated only in cars and women."
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2024, 03:11 AM | #4100 | |
Second Lieutenant
355
Rep 214
Posts |
Quote:
I know that you have to consider the diameter, the shape/ flow and these stuff. I am getting a 200 cell version which will be capable to 650/700 horsepower and I was curious if I could see differences in the lig with same software version. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2024, 07:33 AM | #4101 |
Brigadier General
1980
Rep 3,988
Posts |
No, you cannot. There are too many variables and no direct sensor or value that measures exhaust back-pressure / resistance.
What you may be able to see however is a quicker spool of the turbo (hence quicker building up of boost once you hit the throttle at specific RPMs and gear), on the same map. I personally doubt it will be measurable between your 300 cell and 200 cell DP (the difference, if any, would be quite small), but that's the only thing in the logs (that I can think of) which could indicate a higher-flow exhaust system and relief on the turbo. Don't expect miracles though.... keep this chart in mind, it is rather indicative about the difference between catted, high-flow DPs ...:
__________________
"Large increases in cost with questionable increases in performance can be tolerated only in cars and women."
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2024, 02:09 PM | #4102 |
Second Lieutenant
355
Rep 214
Posts |
Thank you for your input.
It is funny that you refer to a graph where different amount of cells are compared and above you wrote, that comparing cells "are marketing term only". I am getting now a single 200 cell downpipe with 146mm diameter and optimised flow. In comparison the HJS 300 cell downpipe is much more restrictive. You can literally see the difference when you compare it side by side. With my actual HJS downpipe my 550hp are max, whith the new one, 650 should be no problem. But lets see how it will work out. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2024, 03:23 PM | #4103 |
Brigadier General
1980
Rep 3,988
Posts |
Not “funny” at all - the graph compares very specific 200 and 300 cell downpipes and is as such not generic, although indicative about the potential differences in performance.
Not sure what could be misinterpreted really… Good luck with the new DP I think we went quite offtopic here.
__________________
"Large increases in cost with questionable increases in performance can be tolerated only in cars and women."
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2024, 05:32 PM | #4104 |
Enlisted Member
2
Rep 31
Posts |
Hello,
I flashed MHD Stage 1 95 RON map to my m240i then I logged it afterwards. I have a question, it might sound stupid but I am new here. Torque act. clutch nm reaches 480 at maximum which is lower than the claimed stock value. And according to my calculation using torque and rpm, the car making a 350 hp which is just 10 hp more than the stock. Is the torque value on MHD accurate? Or is there something wrong with my car? Car is running on 95 RON fuel and the spark plugs are 10k km old. I am leaving the datalog below for those who might want to review. Thanks! https://datazap.me/u/ycilgin/2024-04...=15-26&mark=67 |
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2024, 03:42 AM | #4105 |
Second Lieutenant
355
Rep 214
Posts |
In my opionion, the timing corrections aren´t looking good at all. They are not dangerous high, but also not good. Perhaps your fuel isn´t that good. I think you know that, because you flashed the "smallest" map.
Would be interesting to see a log with stock map. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2024, 04:43 AM | #4106 | |
Brigadier General
1980
Rep 3,988
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
"Large increases in cost with questionable increases in performance can be tolerated only in cars and women."
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2024, 06:02 AM | #4107 |
Enlisted Member
2
Rep 31
Posts |
Thanks for your reply. I will log the car with default parameters. By the way, the car is running on the best fuel I can find here. If the problem is caused by fuel, should I go back to stock? Would it be dangerous to drive as it is right now?
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2024, 06:04 AM | #4108 | |
Brigadier General
1980
Rep 3,988
Posts |
Quote:
Bear in mind that fuel quality can vary between different gas stations from the same chain or even within batches, at the same station. I have experienced that here too.
__________________
"Large increases in cost with questionable increases in performance can be tolerated only in cars and women."
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2024, 07:11 AM | #4109 | |
Enlisted Member
2
Rep 31
Posts |
Quote:
https://datazap.me/u/ycilgin/mhd-sta...og=0&data=3-17 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2024, 07:25 AM | #4110 |
Brigadier General
1980
Rep 3,988
Posts |
This indeed looks quite bad! Do not drive this setup!! It is dangerous and you are not making any power, clearly (you see you are doing 460 Nm torque only).
As far as I can see however this is now Stage 1 RON 98 map!? The previous one was on Stage 1 RON 95. Are you now running a 98 map with 95 fuel, if that's the best available around you!???
__________________
"Large increases in cost with questionable increases in performance can be tolerated only in cars and women."
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2024, 11:42 AM | #4111 | |
Captain
518
Rep 971
Posts |
Quote:
Finally, the thing we don't want to see is actual knock events (timing being pulled is preventing those from happening). A single knock event here or there isn't a big deal because maybe you got a bad batch of low octane fuel. But to have multiple knock events in a single pull or a knock event that never goes away can lead to damage. The DME can only pull -10 degrees of timing at full load on the stock tune and unless your tuner changes that (which no tuner increases to -15 they will most likely decrease it... but that's a different story) once you go above -10 degrees of timing pull you will seriously knock consistently and probably end up seriously damaging the engine.
__________________
Dustin Braun @ Braun Performance Tuning
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-05-2024, 03:37 PM | #4112 | |
Enlisted Member
2
Rep 31
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-05-2024, 04:45 PM | #4113 |
Brigadier General
1980
Rep 3,988
Posts |
You should be more careful. That’s how you accidentally kill an engine.
__________________
"Large increases in cost with questionable increases in performance can be tolerated only in cars and women."
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2024, 05:35 PM | #4114 |
Enlisted Member
2
Rep 31
Posts |
Hello,
I flashed MHD Stage 0 map, afterwards I flashed Stage 1 95RON map. As I was comparing the datalogs, I noticed that stage 1 map has lower maximum torque and makes almost the same maximum power. Is it possible that the torque at clutch value is not accurate? Or is there something wrong with my car? Datalogs are below for those who might want to review. Thanks in advance! Stage 0: https://datazap.me/u/ycilgin/stage0?log=0&data=20-33-52 Stage 1: https://datazap.me/u/ycilgin/stage1?log=0&data=20-33-52 |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|