[grassy_91]

Originally Posted by TreDirtyFive

A few bm3 power trolls are making fun of these numbers on other threads and saying that the MP tune is trash & unrefined...once bm3 is out we should do a dyno wars day.

I mean I’ve had the jb4 with meth and catless dp on 91 and that put down something like 418whp/435tq on 3 gallons of e85 but my AFR’s were horrible. It was very inconsistent and the graph was all over the place. For Chris’ car to put down 407/439 with just a flash and 2 gallons e85 is very impressive. What a lot of people also don’t understand is that once we hit around ~400whp/tq, traction becomes the biggest issue. The next big mod before adding more power should really be an LSD.

Anyhow, I wanted a flash tune that made a lot of power while being extremely consistent AND safe- Alex was/is/has been able to provide that for us. I’m not down to attempt getting ~500whp if it means that I risk blowing my engine

A dyno wars day would be a lot of fun! Great way for members to come together and chat about our cars and make some new friends

[EricVR4]

Originally Posted by grassy_91

My best numbers were 456/471

Originally Posted by chenry

Mine was 407/429 - with 2 gallons of E85 and just the engine/tranny tune.

Alex (MP) is sending us logs etc later today tomorrow and we'll post those up when we get them

I am very very pleased

I missed the live IG but those are some solid numbers! Thanks to both of you for taking the time/money to hit the dyno!

I agree about the comment of getting an LSD too before focusing on putting down even more power. These cars are desperate for one. Even with just MPPSK I get a ton of random wheelspin (it's better now that I ditched the run flats, but still there)....I imagine it just gets exponentially worse with a DME flash. It's pretty stupid they don't come with one from the beginning in all honesty.

[MissionPerformance]

Originally Posted by eric97h

LMAOO lovely results couldn’t even beat out a mere ib4 numbers jb4 with meth intake downpipe did 460 wheel while they were in beta . Dme and jb4 with meth on just 93 octane no e85 did 500 wheel. How is this better than bm3 tune again ? The other guy for 407??? For a flash tune ????? My dinan tune dynos at 400 wheel ���� my man wirh a jb4 jntake downpipe did 414 wheel ! How and why are these numbers so low for a flash tune ??

Hey Eric, its interesting you would post something like this, especially after posting a log online of your BM3 flash. You said that your gauges dont work and only show about 360hp, and yet your car feels blazing fast. Looking at your logs, you dont have to be expert to see that all you got is an overprices MPPSK flash.

Look at the MAF reading. You are pulling around 35.5lb/min or 966kg/h. That translates to roughly 360bhp. Next, your boost target is 17.2psi and yet your actual only 14.5psi with 85% WG. That tells you that your wastegate map is not correctly scaled and the main pressure limiter and WG calibration map is not adjusted to reflected target torque. I can go on for hours showing issue after issue with that log, but I dont think I need to. I really hope that is some experimental alpha version of a tune and not a final release.




Your Log:
https://datazap.me/u/eric97h/340i-bm...mark=5158-5155

Stock MPPSK:
https://datazap.me/u/missiontuning/3...-20-23&solo=21

Our initial Stg2 released last summer:
https://datazap.me/u/missiontuning/b...=8-10-12-14-15

[eric97h]

Originally Posted by MissionPerformance

Hey Eric, its interesting you would post something like this, especially after posting a log online of your BM3 flash. You said that your gauges dont work and only show about 360hp, and yet your car feels blazing fast. Looking at your logs, you dont have to be expert to see that all you got is an overprices MPPSK flash.

Look at the MAF reading. You are pulling around 35.5lb/min or 966kg/h. That translates to roughly 360bhp. Next, your boost target is 17.2psi and yet your actual only 14.5psi with 85% WG. That tells you that your wastegate map is not correctly scaled and the main pressure limiter and WG calibration map is not adjusted to reflected target torque. I can go on for hours showing issue after issue with that log, but I dont think I need to. I really hope that is some experimental alpha version of a tune and not a final release.




Your Log:
https://datazap.me/u/eric97h/340i-bm...mark=5158-5155

Stock MPPSK:
https://datazap.me/u/missiontuning/3...-20-23&solo=21

Our initial Stg2 released last summer:
https://datazap.me/u/missiontuning/b...=8-10-12-14-15

So let me get this straght your saying my car is 360 hp again that wasn’t even wide open thottrle that was me driving around for 10 min I contacted bootmod and they told me they are working on the displays to show accurate power and I switched to 93 octane and 93 stage 2 and everyhing seems to be working again perfectly and I also posted data logs of. Wide open throttle on 91 after and I will of 93 as well

[MissionPerformance]

Actually according to your own log, your throttle pedal was 100% entire pull. Also interesting on how you are in Cali and finding both 91 and 93 available here. Please do let me know a station around here that carries 93 so I can stop on by and get some.

[eric97h]

Originally Posted by MissionPerformance

Actually according to your own log, your throttle pedal was 100% entire pull. Also interesting on how you are in Cali and finding both 91 and 93 available here. Please do let me know a station around here that carries 93 so I can stop on by and get some.

Eh it’s quite simple octane booster one
And mix 100 octane with 91 to make 93 damm mission performance thought you knew better than this