04-04-2018, 04:04 PM | #23 | |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
Quote:
I was going to post what I'd do wearing my "R&D hat". Similar thing, roll the car and get some measurements. I also suggest the OP plays with pressure to see what happens. Adjust the RC 'front to rear' with tyre pressure. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2018, 04:12 PM | #24 | |
Lieutenant
199
Rep 585
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2018, 06:49 PM | #25 |
Captain
477
Rep 797
Posts |
I am running 40f/42r in PSS 255/40/18 on 8.5 wide wheels all around. Anything less than 36 and the front starts to roll under itself in a hard corner. It's trial and error .. you have to try and find what feels right. I am still messing with them a bit.
If it breaks .. it breaks. You'll always have a weak point somewhere. They're not terribly expensive and it looks pretty easy to get at on jackstands. There is a super good diy on here where the guy even rebuilt one on the bench. That may be the best thread on this site. It sounds like the splines just weren't built strong enough for some. Take the best runflat BMW approved tires and I bet we could still roast one in a few hours. I'd blame driving technique / launching over tires .. the clutch must absorb the initial load, not the axles. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-05-2018, 01:23 AM | #26 |
Lieutenant
164
Rep 496
Posts |
I bought my 2016 330D msport xdrive fitted with Michelin Pilot SS by the factory ie a new purchase with normal tyres so BMW must think the combination works on 225/45 R18 front and 255/40 R18 back.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-05-2018, 03:22 AM | #27 |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
They will be BMW approved, star marked tyres. It is not the run-flat or non run-flat specification that is in question, it's more centred on whether they are star marked tyres, or not.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-05-2018, 03:56 AM | #28 |
Lieutenant
199
Rep 585
Posts |
My mate at BMW has got back to me just laughing saying nothing to worry about change all 4 at once so even tread depths and get tyre pressure correct . . . get them ordered haha
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-05-2018, 04:04 AM | #29 |
Second Lieutenant
90
Rep 227
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-05-2018, 04:11 AM | #30 | ||
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
Quote:
What happened to the guy you also quote.... Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-05-2018, 05:15 AM | #31 |
The artist formerly known as AC Schnitzer UK
3609
Rep 4,518
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-05-2018, 05:54 AM | #32 | |
Lieutenant
199
Rep 585
Posts |
Quote:
Thanks Ryan |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2018, 08:41 AM | #34 | |
The artist formerly known as AC Schnitzer UK
3609
Rep 4,518
Posts |
Quote:
Which doesn't take us much further forward We do know though that BMW subtly change the specs of the cars during their model life and this can have a knock-on effect which then manifests itself in some cars and not others. |
|
Appreciate
1
HighlandPete6658.50 |
04-06-2018, 10:37 AM | #35 |
Lieutenant
240
Rep 460
Posts |
Hi All,
I also started a thread about switching to non run flats on my 335dx as my currently P Zero RF's are nearing their useable life. I assumed it would be a no brainer to swap over to MPS's and save myself £500 on the 4 as well as improve the ride quality. However all the above talk about the RC and Xdrive system has got me a little confused??? My car was just serviced at Sytners and their report showed uneven tyre ware, front edges bald (cornering too quickly possibly?) and the report was something along the lines of OSF - 3.4 NSF - 3.3 OSR - 3.4 NSR - 3.0 So surely different RC already but no issues and they didn't mention anything to me at the time. Also as I'm running the 20" 405M wheels which were factory fitted I'm fairly sure that the front and rear tyre depths are different, 255/30/20 Rear and 225/35/20 at the front. Any thoughts would be very welcome. Also stock power currently but the car is booked into Durham remaps next month for a stage 1 rolling road remap via the OBD with patch so will be 400+ BHP |
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2018, 11:08 AM | #36 | |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
Quote:
Even the xDrive function itself is adding wear to the mechanisms, the central transfer clutch pack has to adapt to torque transfer conditions. It all comes down to tolerances. When we move to tyres which are not approved, there is no data for how the tyres will perform within the design tolerances of xDrive. If the RC 'front to rear' is greater than BMW approved tyres (tyre and wheel combinations), then either the transfer box components takes the wear, or the tyres effectively scrub to compensate for the difference, or a bit of both. The RC difference has to be absorbed somewhere. It makes sense to see that a tyre with lower grip will slip more readily than a really grippy tyre, one puts more load/wear on the transfer box than the other. Reading static dimensions for the tyres doesn't help too much, we need the dynamic radius, or dynamic RC, of the tyre for the specific application, pressure, load, speed range, etc. Hence why BMW test and approve tyres to fit their design parameters. Last edited by HighlandPete; 04-06-2018 at 11:37 AM.. Reason: Spelling |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2018, 11:23 AM | #37 |
Lieutenant
240
Rep 460
Posts |
Great, thanks. That helps a lot. So I guess if I can find a BMW approved tyre (Star marked) that is also non RF then that might be okay? Not sure I can find such a tyre but I'm sure you could opt for non RF when ordering the car from BMW
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2018, 01:51 PM | #38 | |
General
8566
Rep 19,982
Posts
Drives: 911, Cayenne Turbo, Disco 4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Crieff, Perthshire, Scotland
|
Quote:
I've had the alignment checked today on my car and it was way out, and hence the abnormal wear on the right rear, so looks like it was nothing to do with the tyre itself. The badly worn tyre was actually showing cord in a few areas so I ended up replacing it, and also decided to just replace both rears to make sure I minimise these issues with differing tyre circumferences.
__________________
Current: Porsche 911 991 C4S, Porsche Cayenne Turbo, Land Rover Discovery 4. Gone...G01 X3 M40i, Cayman S 987, F31 340i, Cayman GT4, F82 M4 CP, Lotus Exige V6, G20 330e, F30 330e, Boxster S 987, F31 335d, Mini Cooper SD, E89 Z4, E90 330d 320d, E60 520d, E46 330d 320d, MX5s, E30 325i
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2018, 02:08 PM | #39 | |
Major General
2856
Rep 5,607
Posts |
Quote:
Who did you get the rears from? MP4s again I take it? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2018, 02:14 PM | #40 | ||
General
8566
Rep 19,982
Posts
Drives: 911, Cayenne Turbo, Disco 4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Crieff, Perthshire, Scotland
|
Quote:
__________________
Current: Porsche 911 991 C4S, Porsche Cayenne Turbo, Land Rover Discovery 4. Gone...G01 X3 M40i, Cayman S 987, F31 340i, Cayman GT4, F82 M4 CP, Lotus Exige V6, G20 330e, F30 330e, Boxster S 987, F31 335d, Mini Cooper SD, E89 Z4, E90 330d 320d, E60 520d, E46 330d 320d, MX5s, E30 325i
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-06-2018, 04:00 PM | #41 | |
Lieutenant
240
Rep 460
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2018, 10:54 AM | #42 |
Captain
266
Rep 922
Posts |
Correct, that was me. Has been fine since DMS removed their remap & has been remapped by a local garage.
__________________
Coding. LED Front Fogs. DIY Driver Glovebox. KW Street Comfort. 15mm Rear ARB. Tarox SS Brake Lines. Motorwerks Remap. DIY Rear 12v Socket. M Performance Discs. Tarox Strada Pads. Spacers (10mm & 12mm). Head Unit USB Cable. Rear Diffuser. Rear Light Tints. Non RFTs.
|
Appreciate
1
Lorcan3609.00 |
07-23-2019, 05:42 AM | #43 |
Registered
10
Rep 56
Posts |
Hello, I almost got to the bottom of this...
The DMS Map was causing the surging, a different quality map was put on and the surging was gone, much better power delivery and torque too. The softness and bouncing is still there, 42psi tyre pressures helped a little but not much, there was also slight play in the front suspension bushes and the shocks were really soft, we suspect with the ACS spring drop it caused them both to wear prematurely very quickly. I'm looking at Bilstein Coilovers for my next car, not just a spring change...
__________________
335d F30 2016
Tanzanite Blue |
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2019, 06:28 AM | #44 |
Second Lieutenant
279
Rep 268
Posts |
The issue with non runflat issue only seems to come up with staggard setups. If your car runs the same size on all four corners it should equalize the tires response. If it is a run flat or not isn't an issue from what I have read and heard. I recently ordered a non stock size 235/45-18 and talked to the service manager at my dealership to double check. He basically stated that square set ups have no problems. With staggard setups he has seen issues with x drive. In general staggard set-ups sizing was more critical. If you have rear wheel drive there are are no issues. With xdrive he recommended square setups for long term reliability.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|