07-24-2015, 03:00 AM | #1 |
First Lieutenant
145
Rep 379
Posts |
Power Packs and Remaps - fashion items?
One of the most common topics around the forums are all about increasing engine performance through one method or another. It is usually the larger engines that are the subject of upgrades, we do not see many threads on the *18, *20 or *25 engines. I wonder how many spend not insignificant sums on gaining horsepower.
Now don't get me wrong because my car sees the red line a lot but on our UK roads with our traffic and ability to lose your licence in no time at all, I invariably have to get out of the throttle long before the car runs out of get up and go. On lanes i keep it on the paddles and there is oodles of power to make rapid progress until you meet the next 40 mph robot. Ok I don't take mine to track days, enjoy a track but if that was my hobby I would prefer to use something dedicated to it and wouldn't have the time or money to do it enough to be good at it. Ok I can see the point of handling upgrades as they can get used everyday and I also see the point of driveability improvements but I do not think that if we had to drive a regular saloon or hatch that we would complain about our cars having drivability issues that were engine based. Of course I am fortunate in having a petrol that likes to rev and sounds awesome - sport mode windows down tunnel through the south downs So as I look into the power pack kit I do wonder whether it is something I could really use everyday or give me tangible other benefits to repay the investment? Tin hat on and coat at the ready, awaiting incoming |
07-24-2015, 03:15 AM | #2 |
General
6734
Rep 20,651
Posts |
Very valid post.
For some I believe there is an element of bragging rights ' it's chipped you know' etc. I know a few people that have had engine tweaks carried out, they could not exploit the power they had, never mind extra oomph. For some cars, it does improve throttle response and puts the engine how you like it. I noticed a new thread on about the 340i and having it remapped etc, the cars not even launched as such, so that to me is a fashion statement rather than changing an engine to how you like it. I have had (apart from 330d so far) remapped or engine upgrades ( such as fitting turbos, new cams etc). So anyhow, yes it's a perfectly valid thing to do, if you are already using the power or prefer a different map. With our Mondeo, Ford actually carried out a custom remap, giving it a much faster throttle response and it was noticeably quicker on low down acceleration, we tried I think 3 different maps. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2015, 03:32 AM | #3 |
Brigadier General
1854
Rep 3,983
Posts |
Interesting post. Now I've got both petrol and diesel I think I can answer it pretty succinctly.
I won't ever bother putting anything on the M235i as, as you say, you would really only notice it more once the car is wound up and are you going to really do that all the time? For the 335d, it's a different matter. That engine is not really about redlining and it's all about the torque. Not having to kick down but just surfing on that torque wave makes the driving experience SO much more relaxed. It's not about 0-100 times but surgeability. So in conclusion, I don't think the diesels can ever have too much torque (traction not withstanding) - it's not about going faster but that relaxing way in which you can do it without having to stir the gearbox. For me with the petrol, I like stirring the gearbox as the engine makes nice noises but revving it means I'm already going quickly enough. Now if mapping/chipping was able to release a lot more low down torque, I could really see the point if using for every day driver but for me, not really an issue.
__________________
San Marino Blue M3 Competition Package with Carbon tat, ACS RS suspension, uprated brakes, 'modded' exhaust and a weeny bit more power courtesy of JF Automotive; M235i Convertible with ACS Sports Suspension; Disco 5 HSE Lux
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2015, 03:32 AM | #4 | |
Captain
148
Rep 766
Posts |
Quote:
I don't look into mods/chips any more - maybe I am older now?, these days I just make sure I buy the right engine and here I think BMW packs plenty as standard, Currently driving a 320D GT, I certainly never feel like I need more power |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2015, 03:36 AM | #5 |
Lieutenant
194
Rep 480
Posts |
I've had a few of my cars remapped including a 335i and current car 330d (PPK), and each time I went for a remap that gave improved mid range response not top end, this for me made it a usable upgrade.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2015, 03:54 AM | #6 |
General
8571
Rep 19,982
Posts
Drives: 911, Cayenne Turbo, Disco 4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Crieff, Perthshire, Scotland
|
You can never have too much power!
The issue you're describing is as much about the long gearing as anything else... Current Porsches being criticised for overly long gearing which means you're at illegal speeds before the top of second gear. But I agree with Guys summation of things generally.
__________________
Current: Porsche 911 991 C4S, Porsche Cayenne Turbo, Land Rover Discovery 4. Gone...G01 X3 M40i, Cayman S 987, F31 340i, Cayman GT4, F82 M4 CP, Lotus Exige V6, G20 330e, F30 330e, Boxster S 987, F31 335d, Mini Cooper SD, E89 Z4, E90 330d 320d, E60 520d, E46 330d 320d, MX5s, E30 325i
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2015, 05:10 AM | #9 |
Major General
3719
Rep 8,636
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2015, 05:42 AM | #10 |
Major
288
Rep 1,201
Posts |
totally agree that for most intents and purposes on UK roads a chip/remap on big engine motors have minimal baring on how *fast* you can go and *living life in the fast lane* just never really happens. my 335D has too much power for uk roads, flooring it on country lanes you are greeted by the next corner even before it has chance to spool up propperly. and motorways really what idiot does 155mph on the M6.
that said the tunes often unleash potential in any engine that has been blocked due to EU laws and rules so for me when i went for the steinbauer box my intention was not necessarily to drive fast but the get a more engaging experiance from my car which i believe th box did achieve. also there are bragging rights, and the ability to pull away from a standard 335 |
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2015, 06:12 AM | #11 |
General
6734
Rep 20,651
Posts |
There is also an element of 'because I can'.
I am sort of looking at the new Mustang, lot of car for your money, however even with its engine, I know it's very tuneable and one of reasons for buying, would be to tinker with it. One thing that I do find amusing, is people will remap / chip their car, however not even touch the things that impact on daily driving, suspension, tyres, brakes. The move to add strut braces, is almost the second thing you did previously with a hot hatch, then upgrade brakes, hoses, pads, discs if required. With air filters because no another quickie. Personally handling and how it feels to drive is more important than chipping / remapping, unless you have a diesel that is slow to get up and go. The rare of change the majority of our cars at stock go from say 30 to 80 etc is rapid for a family performance saloon / tourer. Admittedly IF i keep the 330d, then I will be shopping for the usual raft of upgrades lol. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2015, 06:23 AM | #12 |
Lieutenant General
3533
Rep 11,292
Posts |
You could do - but then at some point you'd want to remap that! When does it end!
You'd think an M3 or M5 would be quick enough - but people still remap these.
__________________
Current: Golf R Mk8Previous: Golf R Mk7.5 Mercedes AMG C63 S Coupe F80 M3 Competition Pack |
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2015, 06:26 AM | #13 | |
General
6734
Rep 20,651
Posts |
Quote:
http://www.prindiville.co.uk/bugatti-veyron/ecu-tuning/ As an aside, I have been out with aircraft engine technicians as they setup a jet for the pilot, with the pilot taking for an air test and then asking for more tweaking lol. So yeah at times Mach 2 just ain't enough |
|
Appreciate
1
|
07-24-2015, 06:30 AM | #14 |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
I think many of us agree with the statement, there's a sense of satisfaction from knowing what an engine can do. For me there it is a BUT, (it's a big but) can we really use it enough in daily driving to even justify the need for looking for more from an already decent engine output?
There is a strong argument (often mentioned when this subject comes up), a smaller engine with limited output can be more exhilarating to drive hard, "work it" and be in the top end more time, with more sensory feedback for the driver. I also agree with the more relaxed drive, with more power and torque, it is why I drive the engine I do. I don't typically "need" 300bhp, as driving these days is so frustrating and if we are wanting to drive hard, causes us issues, (high blood pressure as a starter), let alone how other drivers feel about someone who they judge is "driving like an idiot". I remember seeing a Porsche make a 'crazy' overtake in one of the short straights on Loch Lomond-side. From his perspective he did it safely, plenty of power, out and back in again in the space available. The other road users in the queue of traffic would have lynched him, by the reactions, flashing lights, shaking of fists and heads. Plus the Porsche only gained one place and was still in a flow of traffic. He'd simply made enemies because his car could do it. That example is the sort of thing I'd have to cope with most days I'm out driving, if I drove my car closer to it's limits. I also notice the more a car looks the part and users drive hard and fast, the more anti-social it is becoming to other road users. If the tune is for bragging rights, OK for those so shallow and insecure I suppose, but needing it for daily road driving, I do have mixed views. HighlandPete |
Appreciate
2
|
07-24-2015, 06:43 AM | #15 | |
The artist formerly known as AC Schnitzer UK
3610
Rep 4,518
Posts |
Quote:
Our priorities as a tuner are: 1: Suspension 2: Engine 3: Everything else but each to their own |
|
Appreciate
1
|
07-24-2015, 10:27 AM | #17 |
Brigadier General
2815
Rep 4,937
Posts
Drives: 340i MPPSK
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sussex, N.Yorks, UK
|
I always think it's not what you've got so much as how you drive it. If you drive 'badly' enough (undertaking, cutting-in, etc.) then you'll beat people in much 'faster' cars... see it happening most days.
__________________
Life is a state of mind |
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2015, 11:16 AM | #19 | |
General
8571
Rep 19,982
Posts
Drives: 911, Cayenne Turbo, Disco 4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Crieff, Perthshire, Scotland
|
Quote:
We all have more power/big engines/body kits/ M cars or whatever because we WANT them. If someone doesn't feel any need for it then absolutely fine.... I, however, unreservedly love having a quick car. I've lived it ever since I was a kid... "Faster dad!" And I totally accept I'm a big kid now, and will likely remain so. And also, the remap is usually significantly cheaper than the next engine up in any car range... So as car mods go... A bit of a bargain.
__________________
Current: Porsche 911 991 C4S, Porsche Cayenne Turbo, Land Rover Discovery 4. Gone...G01 X3 M40i, Cayman S 987, F31 340i, Cayman GT4, F82 M4 CP, Lotus Exige V6, G20 330e, F30 330e, Boxster S 987, F31 335d, Mini Cooper SD, E89 Z4, E90 330d 320d, E60 520d, E46 330d 320d, MX5s, E30 325i
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2015, 11:20 AM | #20 |
Second Lieutenant
47
Rep 201
Posts |
Theres really no need for the vast majority of mods we insist on with these cars.But modding is a bug for me and a lot of others on here,wether its with your car,mountin bike or even missus
I did the weekend toy/track car for a couple of years or so until i could no longer justify the cost of running 2 road cars, so for me in consolidating into 1 car which does around 20k miles a year i get a buzz from doing bits n bobs to it, and increasing power is definitely high on the list as the grin from planting your foot is all the sweeter!.
__________________
gone but not forgotten, for the most part:
mondeo estate,A4 avant,elise S1,exige S2 190,exige S2 S280, 330D touring |
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2015, 11:33 AM | #21 |
Lieutenant
112
Rep 426
Posts |
For me mapping is definitely something I do, for ME! I just like having that extra bit of power. My car is already faster than most things on the road but it could be quicker and it puts a smile on my face going fast! It has nothing to do with fashion- if I wanted that I would buy a 318i, stick a wheelbarrow exhaust and a 340i badge on it, plus a wrap and an Alacantra trim. The car would be very fashionable but still be as slow as $hit.
I just don't understand why people don't get mapping? Using the same logic surely everybody should only ever want a 3 cylinder diesel? After all it's 'plenty fast' and gets you where you need to be 🐌 |
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2015, 12:25 PM | #22 | |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
Quote:
Tuning a car has always baffled some folks, often doesn't make sense. Been the same since tuning Minis and the like, when guys would tune an 850 Mini, often at more cost than simply buying a similar aged Cooper S, and still had less power. It was simply a challenge for some, today's 'mapping' is really too easy a 'cheat' by comparison. As has been said, we really don't need the tunes on something like a 330 and upwards. Wait until we are all driving EV, (or Hybrid combos) then tuning 'motors' may be more of a challenge. I'm sure there will be a market for improving motors... magnet upgrades and re-wiring kits. HighlandPete |
|
Appreciate
2
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|