F30POST
F30POST
2012-2015 BMW 3-Series and 4-Series Forum
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts
BMW 3-Series and 4-Series Forum (F30 / F32) | F30POST > Technical Forums > N55 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications > ECUTEK!!! FTW!!!
Studio RSR
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      10-14-2020, 03:02 PM   #23
ZM2
Brigadier General
2811
Rep
3,695
Posts

Drives: 2017 LBB M2
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Baltimore

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cookiesowns View Post
Not everyone's end goal is a piece of paper with numbers.
If you think that's my goal, you clearly haven't seen many of my threads.
Appreciate 0
      10-14-2020, 03:04 PM   #24
cookiesowns
;)
cookiesowns's Avatar
587
Rep
898
Posts

Drives: X5 45e, 535i N54, X3 N55
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: West

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZM2 View Post
You do realize that argument works in OTS's favor? There are way more guys (and data points) running OTS than custom tunes.

The only way a custom tune produces more power than the new OTS tunes is by eating into safety margins. The limited power upside of that approach does not interest me especially when my car sees the majority of its life on track or at WOT. If I were a street or single pull kind of guy, maybe my thoughts would be different.

In my case, I have about 40 track days on BM3 OTS tunes with no tune related issues, while I tried a well known custom tuner (CJ) who couldn't make a map as stable or strong at Stg 2+ E30 on the same hardware.

BM3 has raised the bar--let's see some hot shot tuners do better than Stg 2+ E30 and hear that their engine is still intact a year later. I've pushed the new OTS super hard in 105F+ weather and power levels stayed consistent, which is pretty amazing.
You’re forgetting that the BM3 editor is only has a handful of tables compared to what’s actually available in the DME.

Meaning OTS maps probably have more changes than what the editor allows you to do.

So again not apples to oranges.

Let’s do a comparison of a OTS map to a custom ECUTek tune that’s refined. Standing mile on the same car.

Up for it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZM2 View Post
If you think that's my goal, you clearly haven't seen many of my threads.
I haven’t no.


Let me know when you monitor cylinder pressures and EGTs on individual cylinders running aggressive lambdas on track on any tune any car, OTS or not.

Tell me if that will survive an endurance sprint.

We have people that will overheat a stock M2 on track here, imagine what they’ll do with an extra 100whp and more aero?
Appreciate 0
      10-14-2020, 03:09 PM   #25
ZM2
Brigadier General
2811
Rep
3,695
Posts

Drives: 2017 LBB M2
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Baltimore

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cookiesowns View Post
You’re forgetting that the BM3 editor is only has a handful of tables compared to what’s actually available in the DME.

Meaning OTS maps probably have more changes than what the editor allows you to do.

So again not apples to oranges.

Let’s do a comparison of a OTS map to a custom ECUTek tune that’s refined. Standing mile on the same car.

Up for it?



I haven’t no.
I think you're exactly right that the new OTS's have more going on that what's available in editor, which is why the custom tuners are struggling to compete with OTS within the same platform.

Absolutely, let's get some tricked out Ecutek tunes competing with Stg 2+ E30. We all want to see that healthy competition!

As for track use, dig into my threads--I doubt anyone else is pushing as much reliable power on track for an entire tank of gas on a 100F track day, in a year round daily driven M2. I'm not flaunting that as a badge, I just knew that was my goal and everything I've done with my car has helped me achieve that.

Hence, why I didn't go PS2 and just stuck with my little Dinan turbo--there's no way to keep the car cool on track with PS2 levels of power without detuning to a point that would only make a few more hp than where I'm at.

Last edited by ZM2; 10-14-2020 at 03:15 PM..
Appreciate 1
      10-14-2020, 03:36 PM   #26
-Eidos
@lbb_kev
490
Rep
512
Posts

Drives: 2018 BMW M2 (LBB)
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZM2 View Post
I think you're exactly right that the new OTS's have more going on that what's available in editor, which is why the custom tuners are struggling to compete with OTS within the same platform.

Absolutely, let's get some tricked out Ecutek tunes competing with Stg 2+ E30. We all want to see that healthy competition!

As for track use, dig into my threads--I doubt anyone else is pushing as much reliable power on track for an entire tank of gas on a 100F track day, in a year round daily driven M2. I'm not flaunting that as a badge, I just knew that was my goal and everything I've done with my car has helped me achieve that.

Hence, why I didn't go PS2 and just stuck with my little Dinan turbo--there's no way to keep the car cool on track with PS2 levels of power without detuning to a point that would only make a few more hp than where I'm at.

Actual good apples to apples data? Let's goo!
Appreciate 0
      10-14-2020, 03:37 PM   #27
Pussiwillow
Major
521
Rep
1,148
Posts

Drives: Alpine white 2014 335i msport
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Arizona

iTrader: (2)

I'm just here to measure pps
Appreciate 2
-Eidos489.50
      10-14-2020, 04:00 PM   #28
cookiesowns
;)
cookiesowns's Avatar
587
Rep
898
Posts

Drives: X5 45e, 535i N54, X3 N55
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: West

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZM2 View Post
I think you're exactly right that the new OTS's have more going on that what's available in editor, which is why the custom tuners are struggling to compete with OTS within the same platform.

Absolutely, let's get some tricked out Ecutek tunes competing with Stg 2+ E30. We all want to see that healthy competition!

As for track use, dig into my threads--I doubt anyone else is pushing as much reliable power on track for an entire tank of gas on a 100F track day, in a year round daily driven M2. I'm not flaunting that as a badge, I just knew that was my goal and everything I've done with my car has helped me achieve that.

Hence, why I didn't go PS2 and just stuck with my little Dinan turbo--there's no way to keep the car cool on track with PS2 levels of power without detuning to a point that would only make a few more hp than where I'm at.
On a side note.. I know this is S55.. some good feedback from others in the thread here: https://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh...php?p=26797551

And I'll quote my own response here too:

Quote:
Originally Posted by cookiesowns View Post
ECUTek is a tuning solution, it's still up to the tuner you choose to be competent.

Having a tuner that knows BMW's inside and out is a very strong asset when tuning these things

Ultimately what I tell people... choose ecutek if you want to run Flexfuel Today, and know exactly what you want in a calibration for your car.

If you just want a flash and forget tune, both MHD, BM3 are good options.

For big power cars, ECUTek is night and day in what is available to the tuner to really dial in the calibration on your car.

Not all ECUTek tuners are equal, just like not all custom tuners on BM3 are equal
__________________
BM3, MHD, ECUTek Calibrator | N55/S58 specialist | 2023 X5 45e Frozen Marina Bay Blue
Appreciate 1
ZM22810.50
      10-14-2020, 06:23 PM   #29
cookiesowns
;)
cookiesowns's Avatar
587
Rep
898
Posts

Drives: X5 45e, 535i N54, X3 N55
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: West

iTrader: (0)

After a discussion with a few people, I've decided to update some of my posts above to add in a disclaimer, as indeed I currently have an inherent bias towards ECUTek, but the facts are objective.

End of the day, my opinions are of my own.
__________________
BM3, MHD, ECUTek Calibrator | N55/S58 specialist | 2023 X5 45e Frozen Marina Bay Blue
Appreciate 0
      10-14-2020, 10:13 PM   #30
Logicoeur
Lieutenant Colonel
Logicoeur's Avatar
990
Rep
1,934
Posts

Drives: F30 335i xDrive
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Boston

iTrader: (0)

So it sounds like ECUTEK only has better and more granular tooling than BM3 and MHD for custom tuners and tuning. For the larger part of the market, which are just Joe schmoes going after "big powa" and "sick burnouts" OTS tunes end up being the better value.

If any of the popular custom tuners wanted to compete with the OTS tunes from BM3 and MHD than ECUTEK would be the best option for them to do that.

Golang or Node. You can write a web app in both but one will run faster and cleaner than the other.
__________________
F30 335iX | Remus Axleback | Fabspeed Catted DP | VRSF Comp IC | 18X9 ET35 19lb MT1 | 255/40/18 ECS | Ohlins RT Millway Street | Millway Control Arm Bushings | Turner Endlinks | TMH 75mm 14x1.5 Studs | BMW MPerf LSD | XDelete | Pipercross Filter | MHD Stg2 93
Appreciate 0
      10-14-2020, 10:33 PM   #31
Commanderwiggin
Major
Commanderwiggin's Avatar
2049
Rep
1,200
Posts

Drives: M2C - X3M - Turbo E46 M3 - 45E
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SOCAL

iTrader: (2)



Ecutek is the best platform and the only one with Flex Fuel integration (actually working).

Ecutek has had B58 tuning in play for like 2 months since racerom was released and nearly all the top 20 cars are ecutek equipped in the 9sec quarter mile club and 1 now in the 8's which is crazy for being so new. These racerom updates will be pushed over to the S55 soon which will add launch control and other upgrades to the year old S55 racerom.

I've had Ecutek for over a year and it's worked exactly how I want and the tune has always been spot on. My wife and other family members drive the car and I'm comfortable knowing they won't have any issues. It's dialed so nice for drive-ability. Bend Calibration has tuned many of these cars now and imo is the best tuner for the platform and they fully understand the injection limitations...they also offer a full instruction set for new users and are the only company to offer a plug and play fuel filter setup and a can integrated flex sensor installation kit.

BM3 has said flex is coming...well a year ago they told me it wasn't going to happen. So it's good to see this reaction and now map switching is working...albeit the function is to match what Ecutek offers. You know what they say...imitation is the greatest form of flattery.

As a customer we have the choice...some will go Apple, others will go Android. I'm happy with my choice and at the end of the day it's the same ecu in the car so it's all how you configure it to work for you. Do what you want, you only live once.
__________________
575RWHP F87 M2C - ECUTEK RACEROM with flex fuel tuning by Bend Calibration
1000+RWHP E46 M3, Lab22 Built Turbo S54, Bend Calibration Tuned - BMW Half Mile Record Holder
Appreciate 2
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 PM.




f30post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST