09-20-2015, 01:54 PM | #23 | |
Banned
1130
Rep 4,686
Posts
Drives: L'Orange
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
|
Quote:
THREE FITTY IN BLUETOOTH and no Corolla badge!? What a horrible deal! You buy a Corolla for the badge. The hot badge of practicality and regret....carry on then! Last edited by IEDEI; 09-20-2015 at 02:39 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-20-2015, 02:05 PM | #24 |
Major General
10156
Rep 8,625
Posts |
There is some sort of poor assumption here that these cars are in the same class, engineered for the same purpose and are somehow equals in only one way and that would be options...
How much does a RWD corolla w 50/50 weight distribution, a six cylinder straight six motor, an a zf 6 tranny and BMW driving dynamics cost? You want to see nickel and diming.... please visit www.Porsche.com |
Appreciate
0
|
09-20-2015, 04:50 PM | #26 | |
New Member
4
Rep 25
Posts |
Quote:
Nobody buys these cars cuz their economical. Although I was a little surprised that an upgraded Honda leather seat could feel more comfortable than a stock vinyl bmw or Mercedes ones. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-20-2015, 06:26 PM | #27 | |
First Lieutenant
205
Rep 319
Posts |
Quote:
I personally find it ridiculous having to pay for navigation, back up camera, and other options that auto manufacturers have begun to make standard. In terms of how they were engineered and the materials used is a different story. I think its a bit foolish to drop over $50k to $60k on an a base model of a high end brand. I just checked to add navigation on a 2016 BMW 320i its $1,950. Which is completely ridiculous, when I can use Google Maps on my phone thats free and updated regularly. Porsche is the king of understanding how to make money off options and accessories. Hence why it can make over $23k profit per vehicle. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-21-2015, 12:16 AM | #28 |
First Lieutenant
116
Rep 380
Posts |
If you think BMW 3 series has good build quality you really need to drive some of the new japanese luxury cars. They're way ahead in terms of interior design, materials and tech. And also usually have more power and get better gas mileage than the bmw equivalent in the class.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-21-2015, 12:27 AM | #29 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
2939
Rep 1,609
Posts |
Quote:
lol you win funniest post of the week! +1 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-21-2015, 02:47 AM | #30 |
Colonel
232
Rep 2,643
Posts |
I agree with the OP, but BMW has been like that since the 80s. Most of the options are way overpriced and everyone knows it. You probably shouldn't visit a Porsche dealer if this type of thing upsets you.
It doesn't worry me so much because I generally only want a few essential options. I will specify a factory ordered car to get exactly what I want. Now I'm just waiting for the day that BMW ask me to pay $950 to get the optional dip stick installed in the block. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-21-2015, 08:35 AM | #31 | |
First Lieutenant
205
Rep 319
Posts |
Quote:
I doubt this type of pricing on options will truly effect the M brand mainly because its the performance that has already caused us to buy the vehicle. But for a car buyer whom doesn't care for performance, is looking for something high end, decent gas mileage, relatively inexpensive to maintain, and for something to come well equipped they might be looking else where as BMW falls flat there. Lexus and Acura have been smart to realize this. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-21-2015, 09:05 PM | #32 |
Lieutenant General
11569
Rep 11,136
Posts |
There aren't many that buy a car only because of some basic options that are thrown in. Would you cross-shop a Corolla to a 3-series and choose the Corolla just because it had LED headlights and a backup camera? I doubt it.
I always laugh when people start comparing how fast an M3 is compared to an S4 or something. Who cares if one beat the other on the 'Ring. Is that the only reason why you buy a car, because it has a fast 0-60? Personally, the main reason I buy a car is because I like the exterior of it. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2015, 03:01 AM | #33 | |
First Lieutenant
70
Rep 328
Posts |
Quote:
Also don't agree with them being ahead in all those areas. Dating back to WWII, history says otherwise and the status quo has never changed: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/07/03...referrer=&_r=0 I think your missing the point completely, BMW could throw in those things into the base package, it would just raise the cost of the base package and the potential client would lose choice in the matter and BMW would sell less. I think the point of the NY Times article is that the Germans are giving their potential clients more choice than ever. Why should they need to modify a winning strategy of many different models and a la carte options and packages? Competition is the only way to bend BMW to your wishes and evidently the competition hasn't been able to do so yet, the day you see BMW giving away the farm is the day the competition has finally built an equivalent or better vehicle. There's a reason you are getting that "free stuff". |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2015, 06:23 AM | #34 |
dances with roads
4718
Rep 4,096
Posts |
Buying a BMW + griping about BMW's sales policies 4 years later = the longest gestation period for buyer's remorse I've ever seen.
Although VW diesel owners may top it. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2015, 02:29 PM | #35 |
Colonel
1753
Rep 2,942
Posts |
Here's the thing, everyone: context is king.
First off: Most German luxury cars are not luxury cars in Germany. Mercs are taxis over there, fer cryin' out loud. Most BMWs are actually considered a rung above Merc in its home country -- but even so, the majority sold are manuals with cloth/synthetic upholstery and basic power packages -- and the driving-assist and infotainment features are more limited as well. Secondly: The reason above is part of the reason BMW and other German manufacturers 'nickel-and-dime' options on U.S.-spec cars; the options are somewhat unusual. In BMW's case, this practice dates back to the 1970s when BMWs were not marketed as luxury vehicles per se in the U.S. -- they were marketed as engineered driver's cars (as opposed to Merc back in those days, which were marketed as luxury cars despite its home-country pedigree). All BMW has done in the interim is continue tradition because the practice simply hasn't hurt sales -- in fact, it has likely helped sales (see point #3 below). Furthermore, "Packages" (Premium Package, Cold Weather Package, etc.) are not determined by BMW AG; they are determined by BMW NA. Thirdly: Be thankful that BMW allows for the nickel-and-diming, and us to order cars a la carte, built to our specifications. VW doesn't allow that. Audi doesn't allow that. Honda/Acura doesn't allow that. Neither does Nissan or Infiniti. Lexus? Kind of ... sort of? Hell: MINI -- a BMW-owned company -- doesn't allow for that. Does BMW nickel-and-dime? Yep. And that it does actually sold me on one.
__________________
--Life is a journey made more exciting with a fast car.--
--Helmets are for closers.-- <<Current: "Blackened" '18 NBM Porsche 718 Cayman ... Gone (but not forgotten): "Blackened" MG '15 228i M Sport w/aFe filter/scoop, Hertz drivers, P3Cars multigauge, other goodies>> |
Appreciate
0
|
10-01-2015, 08:28 PM | #36 |
Second Lieutenant
65
Rep 205
Posts |
Definitely agree. I have a '16 M235i. It blows my mind that for a 50k car, a rearview camera wasn't a standard feature, and that a car alarm was not a standard feature until this model year! I can definitely understand paying more for luxury options and uber tech features....but really BMW??
Last edited by Outrun; 10-01-2015 at 08:33 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-03-2015, 09:24 PM | #37 |
Second Lieutenant
16
Rep 266
Posts |
Looking at Toyota and BMW financials it looks like they both have an operating margin of 10 percent. A BMW should out accelerate, have better brakes, better handling, better warranty and free maintenance for four years. Also your experience when going in for warranty work should be much better at BMW dealership. I guess it is what you are looking for. I had a 4 runner once and I had to get the limited edition to,get any of the features I wanted. It was much more expensive than the base model. So,what you are saying isn't exactly true.
I would think comparing BMW to Audi and Mercedes would be a better choice. Compare Toyotas to Nissans, Hondas, Kias and Fords. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-03-2015, 09:26 PM | #38 | |
Second Lieutenant
16
Rep 266
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-03-2015, 11:02 PM | #39 | |
Captain
153
Rep 964
Posts
Drives: BMW 135is | #341/586
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: New York
|
Quote:
__________________
2013 BMW 135is Coupe | Dinan Stage 3 | M3 Subframe Bushings | Dinan Monoball Joints | Dinan Toe Links | 1M Strut Bar | MPS AS/3 - VMR 710's 18x8.5 ET45 / 18x9.5 ET50 | MPSS - BMW 313's 18x7.5 / 18x8.5 | Min Grey, Savanna | Prem, Tech | DCT | Beast #341/586 |
2021 BMW X7 M50i | Alpine White | Children Hauler |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-03-2015, 11:04 PM | #40 | |
Captain
153
Rep 964
Posts
Drives: BMW 135is | #341/586
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: New York
|
Quote:
__________________
2013 BMW 135is Coupe | Dinan Stage 3 | M3 Subframe Bushings | Dinan Monoball Joints | Dinan Toe Links | 1M Strut Bar | MPS AS/3 - VMR 710's 18x8.5 ET45 / 18x9.5 ET50 | MPSS - BMW 313's 18x7.5 / 18x8.5 | Min Grey, Savanna | Prem, Tech | DCT | Beast #341/586 |
2021 BMW X7 M50i | Alpine White | Children Hauler |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-04-2015, 02:56 AM | #41 |
Lieutenant
35
Rep 501
Posts |
Options being standard would not be a discussion if BMW's retained its best in class handling and performance, but since it has been compromised, it becomes a question of value.
|
Appreciate
1
|
10-05-2015, 08:17 AM | #42 |
Captain
467
Rep 804
Posts
Drives: Some fun stuff
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Philly, PA
|
I think the OP doesn't understand the difference between a volume product and a luxury product. A luxury item is not designed to provide value or, more for less. Especially with toyota, its much harder to personalize your car. The reality is that toyota generally only offers cars with certain options in specific markets. The configurator is not representative of what is in your particular market, so if you want something that is outside of the standard for your market---good luck with that. It's part of toyota's volume strategy. A BMW--you can get whatever options are available for your car.
People on this forum may get jerked up that certain options aren't standard, but frankly, I don't want a backup camera in my car. I can see just fine. I like the BMW allows people to pick and choose exactly the BMW experience that works for them. The problem is that options become very expensive because you don't have an economy of scale. The one thing that stood out about my M3 and a major reason I bought it is because it has almost no convenience features: 6MT, cloth seats, no i-drive, but it does have BT, heated seats, and the competition package. It's perfect for me and i would not have bought it if it had leather and iDrive. But in the end, that's exactly part of the luxury experience---you get a lot more flexibility in options. The other consideration is the experience behind the wheel. I've driven a previous generation corolla and although I thought it was very well built, it was like the engineers tried their hardest to remove any aspect of the driving experience that could be considered fun. As a result, it's about the most uninspiring driving experience out there--from what I've read the driving experience of the current car isn't much better than the previous one. If the OP doesn't notice the differences in how the cars drive, then I'm not sure the BMW was a good choice for him. Having said that, I briefly considered an e92 328i. I ended up buying a '12 Mustang GT instead and had no regrets in the least. I now have an e92 M3 and also have no regrets. It's clear to me why the mustang was so much less expensive. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-05-2015, 08:44 AM | #43 |
Founder, Knights of the Roundel website
967
Rep 1,723
Posts
Drives: 2015 M4 and 2018 AMG GT
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Santa Monica Mountains, CA
|
Perhaps this thread should be re-titled: "BMWs are Expensive!"
__________________
Previously: 2014 i8; 2013 650i convertible; 2013 650i Gran Coupe; 2013 X1; 2010 550i GT; 2010 535 GT; 2010 Z4 3.5; 2008 535ixt; 2007 M6 convertible; 2006 650i convertible; 1996 Z3; 1980 633CSi; 1978 630CS; 1972 3.0CS; 1971 Bavaria. (1971; 1979-2005 & 2017 - ? -- the Mercedes years.)
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-05-2015, 11:58 AM | #44 | |
Banned
3262
Rep 6,299
Posts |
Quote:
Japanese automakers approach is in a much more simplified manner (Lexus, Acura, Infiniti) with lots more standard equipment. Since they are big into marketing themselves as a mainstream luxury brand...they're priced as such and I suspect the lack of standard equipment is to give owners a sense of a great degree of customization...at a price. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|