09-27-2020, 09:21 PM | #1 |
Colonel
1075
Rep 2,354
Posts |
ECUTEK!!! FTW!!!
Anyone running ECUTEK? This is looking sick!
__________________
M135i 8AT PWG, MHD, Pure Stage2, WMI via Torqbyte CM5-LT, Custom tuned by PureBoost
(A Dane in China) |
09-28-2020, 09:48 AM | #2 |
Brigadier General
2811
Rep 3,695
Posts |
Great tuning platform, but it locks you into only using custom tunes vs the latest gen OTS maps which have shown to be as good/better than most custom tuners out there (unless you have some very special tuning need).
Add the Ecutek software and cost for four custom tunes, and you're way higher in price than say BM3, which is releasing map switching, flex fuel support, and new Stg 2+ OTS maps soon. BM3 wifi network & direct cable connection to phone just launched, as well. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2020, 08:49 PM | #3 | |
Colonel
1075
Rep 2,354
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
M135i 8AT PWG, MHD, Pure Stage2, WMI via Torqbyte CM5-LT, Custom tuned by PureBoost
(A Dane in China) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2020, 08:17 AM | #4 |
Captain
650
Rep 814
Posts
Drives: 2021 BMW X3 M
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Florida
|
Not many people seem to run ecutek on this platform. Ecutek is super popular on the G37/370z/GTR platform. It basically turns those car's stock ecu's into a standalone. You can do cool stuff like boost by gear, boost safety, afr safety, traction control settings, etc. A lot of really cool features. A90 Supra guys seem to be starting to use ecutek now. The only problem is as mentioned there are no OTS tunes, and the license and tuning suite is really expensive.
__________________
2014 BMW 335i M-Sport - SOLD
2020 BMW M340i - SOLD 2021 BMW X3M |
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2020, 10:48 AM | #5 | |
Captain
473
Rep 931
Posts |
Quote:
You also can’t flash with any phone with ecutek. You have to flash with a windows laptop. They got logging on phones but its so slow compared to BM3. My friend on his A90 Supra went from BM3 to try Ecutek and was majorly disappointed as the tuner made a far worse tune than even the OTS map from BM3. He switched back after. BM3 is around the corner with all the fancy features and all the other stuff you get with it plus not being locked in to some custom tuner. |
|
Appreciate
1
ZM22810.50 |
09-30-2020, 02:15 PM | #6 |
Private First Class
78
Rep 109
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-13-2020, 08:23 PM | #7 | |
;)
587
Rep 898
Posts |
Quote:
BM3, MHD offers OTS's, which are developed by one or two tuners. ECUTek is strictly a tuning platform. If you pick an ECUTek kit from someone who has no idea what they are doing yes, the results will be less than desirble. The logging speed is not true. ECUTek can log at 15Hz over bluetooth or faster with more channels directly over CANBus. I can't speak on timelines as I simply don't know, but the windows laptop downside is something they aim to mitigate. Actually, ECUTek is very cost prohibitive for self-tuners and they actually require a "vetting" process before they allow you to remote tune.
__________________
BM3, MHD, ECUTek Calibrator | N55/S58 specialist | 2023 X5 45e Frozen Marina Bay Blue
Last edited by cookiesowns; 10-14-2020 at 01:19 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-13-2020, 10:14 PM | #8 |
Captain
473
Rep 931
Posts |
My buddy who tried it was getting 8 at best as he added stuff to log for his tuner. Don’t get me wrong its great to have all this software and options as some cars would kill to have anything even remotely close to all we have access to and play with. But with BM3 coming up with all the crazy new stuff and MHD even I just don’t see the real value or advantage over these others.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-14-2020, 12:10 AM | #9 |
Lieutenant Colonel
990
Rep 1,934
Posts |
Doesn't hurt to add another competitor to the market. ECUTEK will just be playing a severe game of catch up behind Bm3 and MHD. They've had a significant headstart.
Feature parity and ease of use will need to be ECUTEKs priority for some time, but if what I'm reading is true about there being no OTS tunes alongside a strong dependency on competent tuners for their platform, it is going to be a wildly steep journey for them. That's just a lot to overcome.
__________________
F30 335iX | Remus Axleback | Fabspeed Catted DP | VRSF Comp IC | 18X9 ET35 19lb MT1 | 255/40/18 ECS | Ohlins RT Millway Street | Millway Control Arm Bushings | Turner Endlinks | TMH 75mm 14x1.5 Studs | BMW MPerf LSD | XDelete | Pipercross Filter | MHD Stg2 93
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-14-2020, 01:22 AM | #10 | |
;)
587
Rep 898
Posts |
Quote:
ECUTek doesn't mind that there are no OTS's, and quite a few reputable tuners do offer "OTS" stage maps for general cars, but that really defeats the purpose. The whole point of ECUTek is to have your tuner tune your car to the exact way you use it. Map 4 as a kill map, or valet map, or track map as an example. Custom mapping strategies for boost limits, torque limits, lambda targets, ignition timings, you name it. All without needing to flash a new map. Then don't get me started on FlexFuel CAN integration that's already done and plenty of cars running it. You don't hear a lot of people talking about ECUTek that are running ecutek because they know it works and all they care about is driving their car instead of posting on forums.
__________________
BM3, MHD, ECUTek Calibrator | N55/S58 specialist | 2023 X5 45e Frozen Marina Bay Blue
|
|
Appreciate
1
Commanderwiggin2048.00 |
10-14-2020, 07:03 AM | #11 |
Captain
473
Rep 931
Posts |
It doesn’t compute for me that’s all since as I’ve said you get way more features for less from others especially when BM3 comes out with Flex and whatever else. Let’s just drop it I guess as we don’t see eye to eye on it right now. I respect your opinion and hope you do mine.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-14-2020, 11:07 AM | #12 | |
Private
20
Rep 93
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
Commanderwiggin2048.00 |
10-14-2020, 01:15 PM | #13 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
990
Rep 1,934
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
F30 335iX | Remus Axleback | Fabspeed Catted DP | VRSF Comp IC | 18X9 ET35 19lb MT1 | 255/40/18 ECS | Ohlins RT Millway Street | Millway Control Arm Bushings | Turner Endlinks | TMH 75mm 14x1.5 Studs | BMW MPerf LSD | XDelete | Pipercross Filter | MHD Stg2 93
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
10-14-2020, 01:58 PM | #14 | |
@lbb_kev
490
Rep 512
Posts |
Quote:
To me, I think it all depends on how you define what is "good/better". For me, I'd pay an extra $500-$1000 in a heartbeat to know that my car is running great on all engine parameters. I'd rather go with an experienced tuner working on a proper tuning platform, which has properly defined table definitions, working on my car vs. a platform that requires tuners to make assumptions on what the DME does to create a one size fits all approach. The OTS maps are great for the general masses, don't get me wrong. They're especially great if your car was the one going through the R&D for the OTS tune. They're also great at squeezing out every ounce of your components for cheap. But you have no visibility into how close you are to the limits on your specific components. You never hear about the random mid-term to long-term issues directly related to a tune because it's easier to deny plausibility on the tune and blame the components for getting old, etc. How many revisions of an OTS map do you ever see for a one-size-fits all map after release, two maybe three at most? How many test cars does the tuner use to get a significant sample size? Is that sufficient? You have to realize that the business model is about appealing to a younger sports-car owner who wants quick power fast and cheap with no obvious issues in the short to midterm (Google for the discounting principle). They also have to create new maps, quickly, for other new cars, quickly leaving other engine platforms in the dust with no iterative improvements. You're trading more WHP for more risk and uncertainty. But isn't that what we're here for ? But once you venture into bolt-ons, aftermarket fueling, and turbos you'd have to be coocoo in the head to think that an OTS map is anywhere near as efficient as a tailored tune by an experienced tuner on any platform, not just Ecutek - unless you're the one supplying the car for the OTS map development running E47 mix for an E30 tune with a Wagner Evo 3 fmic . Even taking a step back, how many owners of these cars have access to 93 octane but can't even run the 93 OTS map correctly without any issues? Same for 91 octane users? How many of these owners post their datalog on the forums to non-tuners like ourselves for advice? You have the security from that with a custom tuner. Just my 2c and opinion. I could be wrong on all fronts and don't mean to bash on anyone. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-14-2020, 02:14 PM | #15 | |
Major General
4358
Rep 7,591
Posts |
Quote:
So what exactly is Ecutek bringing to the table? That's what id like to know. I don't need a full technical explanation at this point, just a simple list of features that are unique to Ecutek. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-14-2020, 02:27 PM | #16 | |
@lbb_kev
490
Rep 512
Posts |
Quote:
Regarding the list of features, I'm not a salesperson for Ecutek but you can view it easily on the site here: For consumers: https://www.ecutek.com/downloads/mar...F%20Series.pdf |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-14-2020, 02:28 PM | #17 | |
Brigadier General
2811
Rep 3,695
Posts |
If it were a couple years ago, your thoughts are correct.
But, the latest generation OTS maps are much more complex now than what the custom tuners are doing to extract power in all driving situations = as much or more power than custom, while being safer in varying conditions. But, if someone going down the Ecutek path wants to show they're able to create more power than Stg 2+ E30 and that it works year round on & off track with no issues, let's see it. My predicted outcome is they'll spend a lot more time & money getting there, and IF they see more power, it'll only be a handful of hp. Doesn't make sense, IMO, unless you're tuning around some very, very specific fuel issue or going for some crazy custom turbo/hardware setup. Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-14-2020, 02:31 PM | #18 | ||||
;)
587
Rep 898
Posts |
Quote:
Why pay for something when you don't know if it's ever going to actually come, or when it's going to come? You still want to be the guinea pig when updates come out and you get stranded 2 hours on a dyno not being able to flash your car? Update: Disclaimer: I'm inherently biased to ECUTek as that's what I use to tune my personal car. I appreciate ECUTek because the feature are there in my hands to use today. There are always upsides and downsides to either tuning platform and it's important for the end-user to know about. When BM3 has the features out I'd be happy to re-evaluate the statements above. ECUTek requires a windows laptop as an example, BM3 and MHD can be done with a smart phone etc. BM3 has features that ECUTek needs to catch up to as well like cloud based datalogging, being able to scan codes across all modules, cloud based map editor. Again all apples to oranges Quote:
Quote:
In Ecutek this was already all defined and I just needed flip the correct bits to get it done. None the less ECUTek has "Racerom" which is true custom logic, meaning I, the calibrator can setup strategies that the factory DME doesn't have, or even better... compliment the factory strategies based on map switch mode I want, or real time ethanol content, or adjusting 0-100% in terms of torque, boost, or what have you via the sport gauges, or the bluetooth app. As an engineer by day, there are some appeals to the web based editor of BM3 don't get me wrong, but ultimately for those that want to tune OE style and have the privellege of getting access to internal bosch/bmw documents which strive to understand how the OE's do it and want to apply it to our cars.. the only way is ECUTek. Or we can continue spending loads of hours defining things in WinOLS, import it to BM3, hope it gets imported correctly, and still lose visibility into the logging parameters that we don't have with BM3 unless.. we again disassemble the factory ROM.. find the ram addresses of the values, and hope BM3 can access it over ENET via the gateway. What sounds better to you? A tuner that can be more effective on a tried and tested platform, or a tuner that has to spend loads of hours doing things in which ECUTek has a very specialized and experience team doing for you 8x5? Quote:
__________________
BM3, MHD, ECUTek Calibrator | N55/S58 specialist | 2023 X5 45e Frozen Marina Bay Blue
Last edited by cookiesowns; 10-14-2020 at 10:35 PM.. |
||||
Appreciate
0
|
10-14-2020, 02:42 PM | #19 | |
@lbb_kev
490
Rep 512
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-14-2020, 02:47 PM | #20 | |
Major General
4358
Rep 7,591
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-14-2020, 02:52 PM | #21 | |
;)
587
Rep 898
Posts |
Quote:
Exactly. I can’t speak for others, but I simply don’t bother with cars on MHD or BM3 even if they pay me big dollars just not worth it. Competition is good, if and when BM3 release those features it only benefits the consumers by having more choices. For now... ECUTek is a no brainer for our clientele. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-14-2020, 02:53 PM | #22 | |
Brigadier General
2811
Rep 3,695
Posts |
Quote:
The only way a custom tune produces more power than the new OTS tunes is by eating into safety margins. The limited power upside of that approach does not interest me especially when my car sees the majority of its life on track or at WOT. If I were a street or single pull kind of guy, maybe my thoughts would be different. In my case, I have about 40 track days on BM3 OTS tunes with no tune related issues, while I tried a well known custom tuner (CJ) who couldn't make a map as stable or strong at Stg 2+ E30 on the same hardware. BM3 has raised the bar--let's see some hot shot tuners do better than Stg 2+ E30 and hear that their engine is still intact a year later. I've pushed the new OTS super hard in 105F+ weather and power levels stayed consistent, which is pretty amazing. Last edited by ZM2; 10-14-2020 at 02:59 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
2
Pussiwillow521.00 theEZV178.00 |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|