02-19-2019, 09:45 AM | #23 |
Captain
268
Rep 609
Posts
Drives: F31 330D xDrive MPPK ACS
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Edinburgh & Glasgow, Scotland
|
The problem [one of them] is that there are no "OEM Msport springs" on the xdrive - they are fitted with SE springs.
__________________
F31 Mineral Grey 330d Xdrive, ACS, Adaptive, MPPK.
Gone but not forgotten: 1967 Triumph GT6 Mk1 (6 pot 2 litre widowmaker) 1966 Triumph TR4A (4 pot 2.2 litre, huge torque, lovely car) 2004 Audi TT 3.2 DSG Quattro (weak springs & nose heavy) 2006 VW Golf GTI (brilliant on good tyres) |
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 09:52 AM | #24 | |
Major General
2465
Rep 5,457
Posts
Drives: F30
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Stevenson, WA
|
Quote:
It doesnt. There are M Sport springs that fit on F series xDrive vehicles. Yes there are. They sit 10mm lower. For the record, I have ACS springs on my sDrive. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 09:54 AM | #25 |
Major General
2465
Rep 5,457
Posts
Drives: F30
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Stevenson, WA
|
In my opinion (not everyones)...
xDrive models are meant to be just that. Vehicles that are used on all sorts of terrain. These are not typically vehicles that are slammed to the ground on coil overs. Some do just that, however. Depends on your lifestyle I suppose. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 09:59 AM | #26 | |
Major
629
Rep 1,470
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 10:01 AM | #27 |
Captain
268
Rep 609
Posts
Drives: F31 330D xDrive MPPK ACS
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Edinburgh & Glasgow, Scotland
|
Because in your previous post regarding the Bilsteins you are not advising him to change his springs.
__________________
F31 Mineral Grey 330d Xdrive, ACS, Adaptive, MPPK.
Gone but not forgotten: 1967 Triumph GT6 Mk1 (6 pot 2 litre widowmaker) 1966 Triumph TR4A (4 pot 2.2 litre, huge torque, lovely car) 2004 Audi TT 3.2 DSG Quattro (weak springs & nose heavy) 2006 VW Golf GTI (brilliant on good tyres) |
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 10:07 AM | #28 |
Lieutenant General
5876
Rep 10,249
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 10:50 AM | #29 |
Major
1505
Rep 1,375
Posts |
I'll have to do a VIN check to tell you what is on our F30 because we got it used. I can tell you that it rides remarkably well (I'm a former XJ owner) with good small bump absorption. Didn't expect that with RFTs. It has more grip than I'm brave, too. The front points well despite the lack of steering feel. Having the 4-cylinder helps I'm sure.
My major criticism would be that the tyres/suspension tramline something terrible on certain grooved concrete roads out here. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 10:52 AM | #30 |
Major General
13344
Rep 7,484
Posts |
Our F30 on adaptive was fine. I never had an issue with it. The F32 on adaptive was a wallowing shambles. It was so sickening I think ACS was the best thing I ever did with the M140i anti-roll bar.
Talking of roll bar. That answers part of your questions. The 1 has thicker anti-roll bars. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 11:04 AM | #31 |
Captain
206
Rep 624
Posts |
I've got the standard suspension on my F36 after deleting the M-Sport suspension. IMO the M-Sport suspension is too hard, does nothing for controlling body roll and causes the tyres to skip over bumpy sections of faster country roads.
That said I do think the standard suspension on the 4er is firmer than the 3er and the 4er has a lower centre of gravity so that probably helps. Also I'd point out that X drive suspension is not the same as "SE" suspension as the ride height on xdrive is higher than the standard suspension - on the 4ER at least. Interestingly there is a youtube channel that looks a the handling capabilities of various cars during their "moose test". I know many people complain the F30 is wallowy or roly-poly but when you compare with other cars it doesn't seem to be that bad - here's a 4er GC in action but there are loads of other cars on there too. Last edited by thescouselander; 02-19-2019 at 11:12 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 11:09 AM | #32 | |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 11:11 AM | #33 |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 11:15 AM | #34 |
Barge driver
8647
Rep 12,421
Posts |
I'm going with wheels and tyres, every car I drive with smaller wheels and bit more fat on the side wall rides and handles well, every one that has 19/20 inch wheels and rubber band tyres gets shown up.
__________________
730d/Z4C
|
Appreciate
3
|
02-19-2019, 12:35 PM | #35 | ||
Major General
13344
Rep 7,484
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 01:33 PM | #37 | |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
Quote:
Shame it not an option on a 3-series. Probably viewed as too complex and too expensive, to even consider implementing in the smaller cars. |
|
Appreciate
1
Soul_Glo13343.50 |
02-19-2019, 01:41 PM | #38 | |
Barge driver
8647
Rep 12,421
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
730d/Z4C
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 02:22 PM | #39 | |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
Quote:
The 17" winter set give a more supple ride at colder temperatures. I'd say very similar to the 18" at decent summer temperatures, which harder up a bit at cooler temperatures. I had read that BMW optimised the F10 AD on the 18" wheel set. Hence the key reason to have them, should be the best. I'd tried AD on 19", on an F10 530d. It was clear at low speeds, the wheels/tyres were driving the suspension. (Just as many are finding on many BMW setups, with large rims and lower profiles). Sport setting controlled the ride better on broken roads than the Comfort setting. (Again something users note on many BMW setups). That set the alarm bells ringing, 19" would be a compromise too far. The fact I was looking to have an F11, with rear air suspension, I knew 18" would be the better choice. 19" wheels would be a bigger handful when lightly loaded, as the progressive spring rate would likely allow more fidget and jitter at low speeds. (5GT owners were reporting poor rear suspension, harsh and crashing, on bigger rims). 18" was the correct choice, to have the smoothest and most comfortable ride quality. The suspension controls the wheels, even at low speed, not the other way around. Brother in law had a XJ Jaguar on CATS suspension, when I got my F11. I'd rated the XJ as a pretty smooth running/riding car, from the time we first tried one. My BMW with AD is even smoother riding, with better body control due to the active roll control. I've no regrets on the choice. Of course 19" wheels would look better, but "fashion over form", not for me. I'll drive around on the 17" wheels in winter months, knowing it is the best setup for me. |
|
Appreciate
2
Wills28647.00 thescouselander206.00 |
02-19-2019, 02:38 PM | #40 |
Major
575
Rep 1,155
Posts |
|
Appreciate
2
fuzzybunny112.00 Soul_Glo13343.50 |
02-19-2019, 02:46 PM | #41 | |
Captain
206
Rep 624
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 03:22 PM | #42 |
Second Lieutenant
112
Rep 289
Posts |
Thanks for those videos very interesting and quite subtle differences between wheel sizes. I have 19" which I would never have specified if I was buying new. That said they seem OK with the softer xdrive standard suspension for my purposes. Although I have found that the bigger the wheel size the susceptibility to wheel rash increases.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 03:40 PM | #43 |
Barge driver
8647
Rep 12,421
Posts |
Good videos he does some good tests, results are as expected tbh.
__________________
730d/Z4C
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 11:20 PM | #44 | |
Major General
13344
Rep 7,484
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|