09-26-2019, 06:25 PM | #1 |
Banned
2311
Rep 5,101
Posts |
New car is shit
On fuel, 21mpg so far, yes I know it’ll get better but 73 quid and 370 miles range is poor, maybe I have it set to USA mpg which is only 23 bucks a tank ish?
|
09-26-2019, 11:44 PM | #5 |
Major General
8459
Rep 8,783
Posts |
Don't worry, I recently got 23.7mpg out of a tankful of diesel in my new car
__________________
Drives - 2020 LR Discovery HSE-L Previous - 2019 LR Discovery HSE-L // 2016 F36 440i // 2009 E90 320D SE |
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2019, 01:36 AM | #6 |
Major General
3719
Rep 8,636
Posts |
Missus is like that with our new Tiguan, she was used to her 150 diesel Octavia costing about 50 quid to fill and go 400 miles (tiny tank). New 230 petrol is the same range but bigger tank so it’s now 75 quid to fill. I suppose sub 30mpg as opposed to over 40 doesn’t help either
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2019, 02:18 AM | #7 |
Lieutenant General
8776
Rep 12,253
Posts |
Broncho, put the roof up, you are ruining the aerodynamics...
I darent check fuel consumption on mine... it was managing 26 on a long run but suspect that will go down after running in service is done today... |
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2019, 03:04 AM | #9 |
Major General
3122
Rep 5,681
Posts |
I always used to think this but my last two new cars have showed little if any improvement as the mileage has increased; after 76k miles my 335d is doing pretty much exactly the same mpg now as it was when it was brand new.
Perhaps it's different with petrol though - certainly hope so for Broncho's sake! |
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2019, 03:05 AM | #10 |
Brigadier General
1774
Rep 3,490
Posts |
You guys don't know how to play the fuel economy game.
I'm in a F90 CP which has just about done 1400 miles and I'm getting 31mpg out of it when trying. Admittedly it is a fukkin chore to get that kind of fuel economy out of it, but it is still possible. How you guys are not breaking 40mpg in diesels I dont know. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2019, 03:28 AM | #12 |
Barge driver
8656
Rep 12,425
Posts |
Rather proves the point doesn't it, if your modern 2.0l 4 pot turbo coupled to a daddy long legs 9 speed auto only gets 21mpg.
__________________
730d/Z4C
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2019, 05:02 AM | #14 | |
Barge driver
8656
Rep 12,425
Posts |
Quote:
I think 21mpg will improve well hopefully or might as well have got an e63.
__________________
730d/Z4C
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2019, 05:16 AM | #15 |
Brigadier General
2876
Rep 3,966
Posts |
Should improve once the mechanicals have bedded in a bit more
That said, MB petrols are not known for their economy
__________________
Owned: 440i GC LCI with MPPSK, F31 330D M Sport with MPPK, F11 530D SE, F11 520D SE, E61 530D M Sport, E36 325i plus many MB's, Audi's & Volvo's
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2019, 05:24 AM | #16 | ||
Banned
2311
Rep 5,101
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2019, 05:26 AM | #17 |
Banned
2311
Rep 5,101
Posts |
I'm not really fussed about the economy but the Audi was returning an honest 35 - 38 on the same commute however they could have been set to different mpg I'll have to take a look but I'm still trying to get my head around the Merc infotainment.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2019, 07:07 AM | #19 |
Major
705
Rep 1,141
Posts |
|
Appreciate
4
|
09-27-2019, 07:26 AM | #20 |
Lieutenant General
8776
Rep 12,253
Posts |
One of the biggest issues the son in law had with both Mercs he drove was how crap on fuel they were versus the equivalent BMW. His were 3 litre petrols but truly poor v 440i the preceded and superseded them...
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2019, 07:42 AM | #21 |
Major General
3122
Rep 5,681
Posts |
Assume these were C43's? If so out of interest how much worse were they compared to the 440i's?
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|