F30POST
F30POST
2012-2015 BMW 3-Series and 4-Series Forum
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts
BMW 3-Series and 4-Series Forum (F30 / F32) | F30POST > Technical Forums > B58 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications > *** bootmod3 for BMW B58 - Now Available ***
Studio RSR
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      02-20-2020, 09:32 PM   #1299
WrxToBeamerGuy
Captain
WrxToBeamerGuy's Avatar
492
Rep
947
Posts

Drives: BMW 340i xDrive
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Utah

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by WrxToBeamerGuy View Post
Getting this error code using BimmerLink after flashing Bootmod3 stage 2 91 octane.
After turning the car on and back off the code is now gone. No permanent codes showing.
Appreciate 0
      02-21-2020, 08:19 AM   #1300
BMWILUVU
Lieutenant Colonel
809
Rep
1,597
Posts

Drives: 340ix
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: The Boibs

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by les anderson View Post
Is there still a bm3 transmission tune in the works for our cars? I feel like the moment I buy xHP ptf will drop their trans tune!
I asked them a month ago. They said they are hoping in the near-future but no ETA since there is alot of development already in progress.
Appreciate 1
      02-21-2020, 07:43 PM   #1301
Atom Ant
Enlisted Member
3
Rep
30
Posts

Drives: BMW 340i 6MT (2017)
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Hungary

iTrader: (0)

This should go to the front page, it is very important comment. I still have 2 years warranty and I want to keep it. Here in Hungary, BMW dealer would definiately look after modifications to not repair the car for free. Maybe even my turned off seat belt alarm, asd, and auto start/stop would fail the warranty.

Quote:
Originally Posted by proTUNING Freaks View Post
As for warranty, best to not mod, at all, flash or piggyback, including hard parts, if warranty is the primary concern. bootmod3 keeps the CVN in tact, however, FASTA report for example is something dealer tools can read and it keeps historical peak values for many running parameters on these cars. Even with piggybacks that don't program the DME one thing easily spotted is fuel injector flow values far outside stock thresholds but there are others as well. Other control units like the TCU also have their own set of historical values stored as well and who knows what else is in place that is only privy to BMW really

No tune/mod is really truly warranty friendly/invisible and if you modify the car just keep that in mind and otherwise have fun! This is no different than jailbreaking your iPhone, rooting your Android device, etc. In most cases though dealer SAs don't really care and just want to get the work done on your car just like any other service shop. Being frank with them is always the right thing to do and we always suggest flashing back to stock when going in for service to keep values stock to not have it mess in any way with their diagnostic procedures.

Last thing if modding your car, which is meant to be fun, will worry you more than having fun with it just don't do it until you're ready for it

Appreciate 0
      02-22-2020, 02:30 PM   #1302
alyabiev
Private First Class
No_Country
161
Rep
151
Posts

Drives: BMW M3 Competition Touring
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Europe

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kern417 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by alyabiev View Post
I think I've found what it is:
I took "Max Load Setpoint" map and multiplied its values by "Load Act." values in % and graphed it over the Load Target curve.
Looks like this new curve is the real Load Actual.

You can see that throttle is closing every time Load Act exceeds Load Target to keep engine output in check.

Green: Load Target
Red: Load Act (real one)
Blue: Throttle position
nice find, now help me find it lol. where is "Max Load Setpoint?" Is it a parameter that has to be logged as well?

edit: somebody else in the bootmod3 group confirmed it. Load Target is the target load on a 200% scale, and Load actual is a percentage of the maximum load setpoint. I guess i see the benefits for a tuner, but this is unnecessarily complex from a logging perspective.
I think that there are 2 thing needed to be fixed:
1. Load Target (Rel.) parameter should be called (Abs.)
2. Load Act. (Rel.) parameter should use Nominal Filling datastream and be called (Abs.) too.

For now Load Act. (Rel.) is indeed showing relative percentage but to the max load setpoint value.

Here is Nominal Filling (selected from "other parameters" tab) vs Load Target (Rel.) on a chart.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Kirill @ OdinTuned
Appreciate 1
kern4174446.50
      02-23-2020, 08:21 PM   #1303
kern417
Cheapskate
4447
Rep
4,993
Posts

Drives: 2018 440i |2016 340i | 2010 X5
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cincinnati

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by alyabiev View Post
I think that there are 2 thing needed to be fixed:
1. Load Target (Rel.) parameter should be called (Abs.)
2. Load Act. (Rel.) parameter should use Nominal Filling datastream and be called (Abs.) too.

For now Load Act. (Rel.) is indeed showing relative percentage but to the max load setpoint value.

Here is Nominal Filling (selected from "other parameters" tab) vs Load Target (Rel.) on a chart.
Yep I got it figured out now. Appreciate it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by umizoomi View Post
As long as 3-pedals are an option, I will exercise my right to suffer the handicap and indignity of slower shifts and reaction times.
Youtube/Instagram/TikTok: @kern417
Appreciate 0
      02-24-2020, 01:36 AM   #1304
Alias1431
Lieutenant Colonel
Alias1431's Avatar
United_States
795
Rep
1,959
Posts

Drives: 2019 BMW X3 M40i
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Washington

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kern417 View Post
no.
Can you please elaborate or provide source information that I can research? Would really like to know more about the reasoning behind that determination. I'd like my powertrain to last me a damn long while.
Appreciate 0
      02-24-2020, 07:04 AM   #1305
luke79
Enlisted Member
luke79's Avatar
3
Rep
40
Posts

Drives: M140i
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: France

iTrader: (0)

Is is true to say that a tune has to send modified torque data to the 8HP50 TCE in order to avoid the torque limiter to be triggered and go past the 500Nm limit ?
Appreciate 0
      02-24-2020, 08:27 AM   #1306
marcthedark
Lieutenant
120
Rep
410
Posts

Drives: M240i xdrive Convertible
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Phoenix Metro Area

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by luke79 View Post
Is is true to say that a tune has to send modified torque data to the 8HP50 TCE in order to avoid the torque limiter to be triggered and go past the 500Nm limit ?
Either that or they actually limit the torque or you use xhp
Appreciate 0
      02-24-2020, 08:32 AM   #1307
kern417
Cheapskate
4447
Rep
4,993
Posts

Drives: 2018 440i |2016 340i | 2010 X5
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cincinnati

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alias1431 View Post
Can you please elaborate or provide source information that I can research? Would really like to know more about the reasoning behind that determination. I'd like my powertrain to last me a damn long while.
my source is everyone running more torque than stage 1 91 without any issues since 2013
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by umizoomi View Post
As long as 3-pedals are an option, I will exercise my right to suffer the handicap and indignity of slower shifts and reaction times.
Youtube/Instagram/TikTok: @kern417
Appreciate 0
      02-24-2020, 09:28 AM   #1308
luke79
Enlisted Member
luke79's Avatar
3
Rep
40
Posts

Drives: M140i
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: France

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by marcthedark View Post
Either that or they actually limit the torque or you use xhp
Actually bm3 ST1 goes past 500Nm, and it's for people with or without xHP, so they probably modify the torque data sent to TCU right ?
Appreciate 0
      02-24-2020, 09:44 AM   #1309
marcthedark
Lieutenant
120
Rep
410
Posts

Drives: M240i xdrive Convertible
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Phoenix Metro Area

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by luke79 View Post
Actually bm3 ST1 goes past 500Nm, and it's for people with or without xHP, so they probably modify the torque data sent to TCU right ?
Usually tunes have a check box to indicate Auto <> Manual/xhp
Not sure about BM3 as I use MHD
Appreciate 0
      02-24-2020, 10:04 AM   #1310
luke79
Enlisted Member
luke79's Avatar
3
Rep
40
Posts

Drives: M140i
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: France

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by marcthedark View Post
Usually tunes have a check box to indicate Auto <> Manual/xhp
Not sure about BM3 as I use MHD
BM3 does not. I think it tricks in some way the TCU to think the torque is under 500Nm even if it isn't.
I'd like to see the same option added to BM3 but they say it's unnecessary...
Appreciate 0
      02-24-2020, 11:22 AM   #1311
marcthedark
Lieutenant
120
Rep
410
Posts

Drives: M240i xdrive Convertible
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Phoenix Metro Area

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by luke79 View Post
BM3 does not. I think it tricks in some way the TCU to think the torque is under 500Nm even if it isn't.
I'd like to see the same option added to BM3 but they say it's unnecessary...
Hmmm ..., I wouldn’t like that. Had Dervtech tune who used the same “trick the transmission” and it sometimes triggered a drivetrain malfunction ....
Appreciate 0
      02-24-2020, 12:08 PM   #1312
kern417
Cheapskate
4447
Rep
4,993
Posts

Drives: 2018 440i |2016 340i | 2010 X5
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cincinnati

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by luke79 View Post
BM3 does not. I think it tricks in some way the TCU to think the torque is under 500Nm even if it isn't.
I'd like to see the same option added to BM3 but they say it's unnecessary...
It's not needed. The transmission torque limits are above what you see in stage 1/stage 2 tunes.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by umizoomi View Post
As long as 3-pedals are an option, I will exercise my right to suffer the handicap and indignity of slower shifts and reaction times.
Youtube/Instagram/TikTok: @kern417
Appreciate 0
      02-24-2020, 12:42 PM   #1313
luke79
Enlisted Member
luke79's Avatar
3
Rep
40
Posts

Drives: M140i
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: France

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kern417 View Post
It's not needed. The transmission torque limits are above what you see in stage 1/stage 2 tunes.
Isn't the torque limit 500Nm for the 8HP50 transmission?
Appreciate 0
      02-24-2020, 02:39 PM   #1314
kern417
Cheapskate
4447
Rep
4,993
Posts

Drives: 2018 440i |2016 340i | 2010 X5
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cincinnati

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by luke79 View Post
Isn't the torque limit 500Nm for the 8HP50 transmission?
This torque limit that everyone is throwing around is a rating found somewhere on a spec sheet. It is not directly correlated to the software limit or the actual transmission limits in practice. And there aren't any specific torque/hp readouts that are transmitted between the engine/transmission. The numbers being manipulated by tuners are in the sports displays.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by umizoomi View Post
As long as 3-pedals are an option, I will exercise my right to suffer the handicap and indignity of slower shifts and reaction times.
Youtube/Instagram/TikTok: @kern417
Appreciate 0
      02-24-2020, 03:02 PM   #1315
hybris
Lieutenant
hybris's Avatar
Norway
205
Rep
500
Posts

Drives: BMW 330e F30 M-sport
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Norway

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by luke79 View Post
Isn't the torque limit 500Nm for the 8HP50 transmission?
500nm is the rated safe torque from the manufacturer, it's not limited to that torque.
__________________
Thorbjorn
16 BMW F30 330e M-sport
Bootmod3 Stage2 / BMS Intake / RM Motors high flow catted downpipe & custom exhaust / BBS CH 19" / H&R Sport springs
Appreciate 0
      02-24-2020, 03:20 PM   #1316
vinzcast21
Lieutenant
vinzcast21's Avatar
161
Rep
446
Posts

Drives: F30 340i MY2017
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by hybris View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by luke79 View Post
Isn't the torque limit 500Nm for the 8HP50 transmission?
500nm is the rated safe torque from the manufacturer, it's not limited to that torque.
Agree. I got the same concern and post my question here, but apparently it should be ok
__________________
=================================
Mod bug will bite you if you buy a BMW
=================================
Appreciate 0
      02-24-2020, 03:47 PM   #1317
luke79
Enlisted Member
luke79's Avatar
3
Rep
40
Posts

Drives: M140i
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: France

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by hybris View Post
500nm is the rated safe torque from the manufacturer, it's not limited to that torque.
Ok, what's the electronic torque limit then?
What's the point of advertising an option for xHP flashed trans for MHD users if it's unnecessary?!
Appreciate 0
      02-24-2020, 06:03 PM   #1318
G.Newt
Major
810
Rep
1,454
Posts

Drives: CT4-V Blackwing 6MT
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: CO -> TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by luke79 View Post
Ok, what's the electronic torque limit then?
What's the point of advertising an option for xHP flashed trans for MHD users if it's unnecessary?!
https://www.facebook.com/xhpflashtoo...3607396621945/
Appreciate 1
hybris204.50
      02-25-2020, 06:19 AM   #1319
kern417
Cheapskate
4447
Rep
4,993
Posts

Drives: 2018 440i |2016 340i | 2010 X5
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cincinnati

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by luke79 View Post
Ok, what's the electronic torque limit then?
What's the point of advertising an option for xHP flashed trans for MHD users if it's unnecessary?!
For OTS maps it makes no difference. My opinion. But it's a universal option that's also in place for custom tunes that can take advantage of it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by umizoomi View Post
As long as 3-pedals are an option, I will exercise my right to suffer the handicap and indignity of slower shifts and reaction times.
Youtube/Instagram/TikTok: @kern417
Appreciate 0
      03-05-2020, 01:11 AM   #1320
vinzcast21
Lieutenant
vinzcast21's Avatar
161
Rep
446
Posts

Drives: F30 340i MY2017
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: canada

iTrader: (0)

Just tried to start the car, stuck on the cranking for almost 4-5 seconds. turned it off. and back on again it starts like normal

any info of what might happened? car is stock just with flash tune of bm3. I had the GTS startup, could that be the problem?
__________________
=================================
Mod bug will bite you if you buy a BMW
=================================
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
bm3, bootmod3


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 AM.




f30post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST