01-12-2021, 08:39 PM | #1 |
Lieutenant
282
Rep 486
Posts |
I'm going stage 2+ tomorrow.
How do I tell from data logging that HPFP is installed correctly? Which parameters should I be watching out to verify installation correctness? Like should hpfp target be higher? How do I make sure engine is getting more fuel for each combustion? Attached below is my stage 1 log: https://www.bootmod3.net/log?id=5ff9...0b4338ff7a3e34 I'm also getting smaller plug gap. Is there a way to verify that from log? Thank you! |
01-13-2021, 08:30 AM | #2 | |
Second Lieutenant
101
Rep 275
Posts |
Quote:
When viewing the hpfp in the log, you will want to look at hpfp target and actual. Those two numbers should always be close together, it's fine if they deviate 200psi or so, but for our b58's, are target will usually be around 2800psi, you do not want to see actual going down to 2200psi or lower. With the stage 2+, you shouldn't be concerned with that at all. I only ran into problems when running higher ethanol mixes on stock turbo (e50 or more) and ethanol mixes on current Vargas GC turbo (e40 or more). That's also because I have TU pump, it can't handle too high of an ethanol mix. Regarding gapped plugs, just keep an eye out on timing corrections. You usually do not want to see -3 degrees of correction throughout cylinder's 1-6. You should be good though
__________________
Instagram- f30_luca
Modifications: Custom E50 Tune by David Shoup, B58TU Fuel Pump, Armytrix Exhaust, VRSF downpipe, Big Boost Charge pipe/bov kit, CTS intake, H&R Springs/B8 Struts, 335is Clutch Upgrade |
|
Appreciate
2
lixiang7349281.50 KrampusF304.50 |
01-13-2021, 09:14 AM | #3 |
Brigadier General
1161
Rep 3,185
Posts |
You should also run E40 to be safe. I verified I had E30 in the tank and was getting a lot of timing pull. Bumped it up to E40 and was fine. Shouldn't have an issue with E40 for any of the upgraded hpfp. I just mix 50% 93 and 50% E85 to get E40 or close enough to it.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2021, 01:22 PM | #4 | |
Lieutenant
282
Rep 486
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2021, 01:24 PM | #5 | |
Lieutenant
282
Rep 486
Posts |
Thank you for your help.
I wanted to verify that I am getting a higher pressure by monitoring the parameters. I was just wonder which number(s) should go up so that I have piece of mind that the fuel pressure is actually higher instead of depending on butt-dynoing. Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2021, 03:30 PM | #6 | ||
Cheapskate
4445
Rep 4,993
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
1
lixiang7349281.50 |
01-15-2021, 03:28 AM | #7 | |
Lieutenant
249
Rep 501
Posts |
any idea how much load (%) and E mix can support B58TU hpfp? I still not crashed it (~210% request at 5500rpm, actual is probably bit less, diag limit is 191.25, so cannot see bigger values) with ~e30 mix, going e50 probably requires less load (boost)? what max load limit you should set running full e85 with B58TU pump?
my log btw : https://datazap.me/u/enemigo/f30-340...=2-13-17-18-19 Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2021, 03:54 AM | #8 |
Second Lieutenant
188
Rep 282
Posts |
no gapping necessary for stage2+ ,
i have stage2+ with e40 blend , it gives me clean logs https://datazap.me/u/thomas/stg2-hpf...og=0&data=3-20 why would your rail pressure have a higher target when you switch hpfp's ? that explains to me you dont know how it works .
__________________
M140i DP , OPF delete , MHD stg2 93oct , xhp stg3
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2021, 09:29 AM | #9 | |
Brigadier General
1161
Rep 3,185
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2021, 10:11 AM | #10 | |
Lieutenant
249
Rep 501
Posts |
yes, myself. with stock hpfp I crashed hpfp at 4000-4500rpm easily requesting 200% load, fuel 98RON.
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2021, 06:27 PM | #11 | ||
Lieutenant
282
Rep 486
Posts |
Quote:
What kind of 0 to 60 or quarter mile can I expect from this set up? I have all wheel drive. 2019 M240i xDrive |
||
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2021, 08:27 PM | #12 |
Brigadier General
1161
Rep 3,185
Posts |
Who has a 91 stage 2+? Doesn't even make sense, you are out of octane before running out of fuel pressure.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2021, 08:32 PM | #13 | |
Lieutenant
282
Rep 486
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2021, 09:38 PM | #14 |
Major
805
Rep 1,452
Posts |
If you have ethanol near you, I would 100% recommend an E30 map, especially with the TU pump. I've been on Stage 2 E30 for awhile now with just sligh rail pressure drop, nothing too severe. I'll be going the TU pump route here shortly.
__________________
2022 CT4-V Blackwing 6-speed
SOLD: 2016 340i xDrive 6-speed DAW v2.5 turbo E40 | Dorch S2 | VRSF DP | MST intake | AWE catback | 335is clutch | CSF heat exchanger | RK Autowerks intake manifold | Orange M Perf Brake Kit | KW Street Comfort coilovers | GTS taillights V2 |
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2021, 03:55 AM | #16 |
Lieutenant
249
Rep 501
Posts |
91AKI/95RON is way too less for even stage2, why run stage2+ without octane? it will be heat, not power generating machine
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2021, 06:52 AM | #17 | |
Private First Class
51
Rep 164
Posts |
Quote:
I do run a xHP transmission tune, but I’m still sorting that one out. Hopefully this will give you an idea for what the regular stage 2 does in the M240, I’m definitely looking foward to your results with the stage 2+ Last edited by Devil doc; 01-16-2021 at 07:07 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2021, 08:16 AM | #18 | |||
Lieutenant
282
Rep 486
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Well I got it because I wanted to run 91 stage2+ map which requires the tu pump and dp. Are you saying I could have run it even without installing tu? |
|||
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2021, 08:48 AM | #19 | |
Lieutenant
282
Rep 486
Posts |
Quote:
Are you talking about more heat in the turbo or cylinders. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2021, 11:20 AM | #20 | |
Private First Class
57
Rep 198
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2016 340i / M-Sport / Track Handling Package / MPPSK / AA DP / CTS Intake / Bootmod3 e30
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-16-2021, 02:00 PM | #21 |
Lieutenant
282
Rep 486
Posts |
Today I finally pull the trigger to get some E85 mix to run E30 OTS map. Tu pump, catted downpipe, new champion plug at .022, kn filter, stage2+.
The car definitely pulls so much stronger. I was able to get the following logs. What parameters should I watch out for to ensure I'm doing mixes right? Data logs: https://www.bootmod3.net/log?id=6003...0b43440ee2c0f6 https://www.bootmod3.net/log?id=6003...90c656f5acc372 I decided to shoot for E33 which turned out to be a good idea since I wasted some through spill and not totally emptying the not-well-designed midwest fuel container. Thank you in advance! |
Appreciate
1
kianf2264.00 |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|