08-06-2019, 12:56 PM | #24 | |
Major
395
Rep 1,010
Posts |
hmmm it seems I have to upgrade MPPSK.
So which tuner do you recommend guys and why ? MHD, BM3, Mission Performance ? Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-06-2019, 02:18 PM | #25 | |
Cheapskate
4447
Rep 4,993
Posts |
Quote:
That being said, I haven't tried any of the others and pretty much everyone that uses other ones enjoys it. There have been a few that switched between MHD and BM3 for various reasons though. |
|
08-06-2019, 05:19 PM | #26 |
Major
809
Rep 1,369
Posts |
BM3 is the way to go.
__________________
2017 M240i/ ZF8 Pure Drivetrain Solutions Stage 1 & torque converter/xHP/ DAW Ultra Flow/ DS2/ Nostrum injectors/ E40 Doug Newton tuned/ ER DP/ Remus axle back/ BMS intake/ FTP CP/ M Perf LSD
|
08-11-2019, 02:32 PM | #28 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
1039
Rep 1,509
Posts |
Quote:
Of course, it hit peak power well short of either figure. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-18-2019, 03:28 PM | #30 | |
Cheapskate
4447
Rep 4,993
Posts |
Quote:
I really wish I would have documented the conditions now that I think about it. I know it was in the 80s but not sure about humidity or anything like that. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-27-2019, 10:24 PM | #31 |
Colonel
1077
Rep 2,357
Posts |
European horses are bigger. EU crank HP roughly translates to US Dynojet wheel HP.
__________________
M135i 8AT PWG, MHD, Pure Stage2, WMI via Torqbyte CM5-LT, Custom tuned by PureBoost
(A Dane in China) |
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2020, 11:27 AM | #32 |
Banned
2125
Rep 3,368
Posts |
Dynojets typically read high, but what really matters here is the gain from the stock baseline run, which is impressive for just a stg1. Are you still on stage 1, 93oct I assume? Any problems since the flash? I am heavily leaning to going this route...tired of the constant modding and just need a reliable and fun daily.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2020, 01:56 PM | #33 | |
Cheapskate
4447
Rep 4,993
Posts |
Quote:
Here are more details on my E85 tuning experience if you're interested. https://f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1679367 |
|
Appreciate
2
eluded3038.00 les anderson145.50 |
10-10-2020, 03:08 PM | #34 | |
First Lieutenant
77
Rep 316
Posts
Drives: C63S Sedan|350Z
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere, AZ
|
Quote:
How are the oil & coolant temps when tracking or running the car hard?
__________________
C63S Sedan: Long Live The V8
350Z: The Very Poorman's 981 GT4 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-10-2020, 07:05 PM | #35 | |
Banned
2125
Rep 3,368
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
kern4174446.50 |
10-12-2020, 01:52 PM | #37 |
Second Lieutenant
82
Rep 204
Posts |
A question concerning MPPSK: in the advertising, it was state that, unlike for n54 engines, they didn't change the intake part but the exhaust for b58 engines, to make it less restrictive, and therefore they could tune the engine more agressively (or something like that..)
When using a stage 1 93 tune, it there any difference in HP or torque between stock exhaust and MPPSK exhaust ? I also notes that cars equipped with OPF filter typically produce less hp when tuned. I suppose that the exhaust does affect somehow the power, or is MPPSK just for louder sound ?
__________________
340 xdrive 6MT - HJS catted DP - MPPSK - TU HPFP - 550i clutch - VAC monoball control arms - Eibach springs - H&R antiroll bars - AutoSolutions SSK - Brembo HP2000 pads
Corvette C6 Z06 Z07 |
Appreciate
0
|
10-12-2020, 02:45 PM | #38 | |
Cheapskate
4447
Rep 4,993
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2021, 10:54 AM | #39 |
New Member
3
Rep 20
Posts |
Have a 2017 440i w/ MPPSK and 6MT... going in today for BM3 Stage 1 tune to liven her up a bit. Apparently my only real options are choosing octane and burble level. Any thoughts/advice?
I'm usually running 91 Octane, but could easily move that up if it means significantly more power? Tank is currently full of 91. Is that a problem? Burble level - I don't want to change it at all. It's beautiful as is with MPPSK. Minimal in Comfort Mode, and a perfect amount in Sport Mode. Assuming these can be kept the same? |
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2021, 12:59 PM | #40 |
Second Lieutenant
69
Rep 287
Posts |
My 340 xdrive made 298/337 at the wheels stock, and 351/413 on BM3 Stage 1. While the numbers were lower than the OP's the % gain over stock was almost identical.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-15-2021, 09:27 AM | #41 | |
Cheapskate
4447
Rep 4,993
Posts |
Quote:
You can adjust burbles anywhere from completely disabled to OEM to full aggressive gunshots. Mine are turned off. It just depends on your preference. You can also disable cold start, adjust boost by gear, enable max cooling modes, and some other options. download the app and you can play with it yourself. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-15-2021, 09:59 AM | #42 | |
New Member
3
Rep 20
Posts |
Quote:
Thanks for the info! I will mess around with the settings! PS - I was following you on Insta for a few months already - nice ride! Was surprised to see a response from you on here haha |
|
Appreciate
1
kern4174446.50 |
06-16-2021, 03:53 PM | #43 | |
Private First Class
48
Rep 112
Posts |
I currently have a 440 with MPPSK. Im really considering getting a catted DP and flashing BM3. Probably a stage 2. May even get the HPFP down the line.
Is even a stage 1 really that much better than the MPSSK??? How many horses would a catted, MPPSK exhausted, stage 2 make? Ive been reading about 430hp+? BTW subbed to your youtube channel kern417. Great stuff, great info. Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-16-2021, 05:08 PM | #44 | |
New Member
3
Rep 20
Posts |
Quote:
Stage 1 91 octane: up to 18% HP / 26% TQ Stage 1 93 octane: up to 20% HP / 26% TQ Stage 1 E30 octane: up to 25% HP / 30% TQ Stage 2 91 octane: up to 24% HP / 32% TQ Stage 2 93 octane: up to 26% HP / 32% TQ Stage 2 E30 octane: up to 30% HP / 35% TQ |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|