[BMWILUVU]

Originally Posted by gameson

LOL, you just said it yourself, both buyers don't get to recoup their investment, so why one buyer has to pay more than the other?

Because the primary user rented it and now has nothing and the secondary owns it and can keep it for the life of the car. Explain it however you want but you will find few lowball sellers. Good luck.

[gameson]

Originally Posted by BMWILUVU

Because the primary user rented it and now has nothing and the secondary owns it and can keep it for the life of the car. Explain it however you want but you will find few lowball sellers. Good luck.

as i said again, the secondary owner will benefit ONLY if he/she owns the car forever, but do they?? almost nobody keeps their car forever

as i said, the true benefactor of this is the third buyer (buyer of the secondary car) as third buyer gets the tune for 'free'

can the secondary owner keep the tune when secondary owner sell their car? Answer this question and you can justify your reasoning, if you can't answer it, then the fair value is 50-50

[armandsellsLA]

Still Available ?

[yanboogie]

sold for 400, lol.

You can just throw the price it cost you for purchasing an already discounted rate software into the overall price of the car when you sell it. AS long as BM3 charges, the going rate at what it is now the product is priced fairly, you aren't really taking a hit on it. One can argue then vehicle depreciation however we all know it's going to depreciate regardless, that's a conscious choice when purchasing a vehicle whether you like it or not. Any remanding physical mods you sell and recoup as much as you can.

It seems silly that one is to argue over the price of a discounted software. If you were really concerned about the resell, you would just purchase it new for the full price. Yet, here we are. You aren't wrong for having your own viewpoint. It just is what it is, Whichever way one wants to look at it, you wanna go fast you pay the piper.