07-31-2014, 05:21 AM | #23 |
Brigadier General
1854
Rep 3,983
Posts |
£51.7k list, 20k pa, 4 years, £15k. Was £2k difference in final amount when we compared cars at dealer. They advised that the difference in part-ex at end of term would be bigger than that. Suppose we'll find out in 3 years (unless I just buy the car off BMW).
__________________
San Marino Blue M3 Competition Package with Carbon tat, ACS RS suspension, uprated brakes, 'modded' exhaust and a weeny bit more power courtesy of JF Automotive; M235i Convertible with ACS Sports Suspension; Disco 5 HSE Lux
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 05:31 AM | #24 |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
Obviously deals, discounts, residuals, all influence the way we see the advantages of our personal car purchase. I can do the same for choosing my 535i, but strip away the variables and really look at the difference in running as near to 'like for like' cars, the cost differences are not always that far apart.
I crunched the numbers before moving back to petrol, trying to put it in perspective, most costs running (530d vs. 535i) were very similar except for the fuel costs. Working from past fuel consumption history (plus fuel monitoring sites) I calculated petrol would close the real world gap, compared to official figure predictions. This has proved to be so, long term average over 30 mpg from the F11 535i touring, mostly for local use, is a pretty reasonable figure. For me, as a low mileage user in the 535i, an extra £5 - £6 per week on fuel against a 530d, is nothing for having a decent petrol engine, compared to the depreciation for many of our cars with 3.0-litre motors, which is typically around £100 (or more) per week. Petrol certainly favours the low mileage user, but as we are not all low mileage users, fuel choice is not always even in the equation. HighlandPete |
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 05:33 AM | #25 | |
Captain
273
Rep 915
Posts |
Quote:
As a % it is favourable but just considering the amount of depreciation as a sum which is in effect what you are paying out - it is more comparable than I thought I like to think I'll run term on my deal and buy out at end but suspect my incessant thirst for consumerism will override. It would make such financial sense for me to keep this car for 6 years Interestingly, my dealer told me my 335i will be a good px as they are so rare. I normally just smile, express delight and go away and research myself though as my experience of dealers is such that they like to keep you happy - although if you have a good relationship with one as I suspect you have based on your posts, then it must be nice to put trust in what they say. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 06:09 AM | #26 | |
Brigadier General
1854
Rep 3,983
Posts |
Quote:
As you say, £2k's neither here nor there compared with depreciation over 4yrs and in all honesty, I'm so blinkered that actually it wouldn't have made the blindest bit of difference in my decision What did sway me was the saving having something with a diesel engine would make from tax point of view. Was quite considerable so diesel it had to be. As hardships go, it's tolerable
__________________
San Marino Blue M3 Competition Package with Carbon tat, ACS RS suspension, uprated brakes, 'modded' exhaust and a weeny bit more power courtesy of JF Automotive; M235i Convertible with ACS Sports Suspension; Disco 5 HSE Lux
Last edited by gtsussex; 07-31-2014 at 07:11 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 06:47 AM | #27 | ||
Captain
273
Rep 915
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 07:51 AM | #28 |
Lieutenant Colonel
240
Rep 1,756
Posts |
Seeing as I was only getting 7 more mpg from my 335d than my 435i it would have taken forever to make it worth me buying a 435d as I'm sure that would be just as bad, also with all the fuss about the crap diesel pumps out I'm just wondering how long it be before they start taxing diesel more
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 08:01 AM | #29 | |
Brigadier General
1854
Rep 3,983
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
San Marino Blue M3 Competition Package with Carbon tat, ACS RS suspension, uprated brakes, 'modded' exhaust and a weeny bit more power courtesy of JF Automotive; M235i Convertible with ACS Sports Suspension; Disco 5 HSE Lux
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 08:04 AM | #30 |
First Lieutenant
36
Rep 351
Posts |
I get 19p a mile from my work so I would make cash on journeys if I go for the 335d. its not a lot but it alters the spreadsheet.
btw good shot for doing the comparison, clearly bored at work or have a job in accountancy? |
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 08:09 AM | #31 |
Enlisted Member
8
Rep 43
Posts |
Average figures for MPG don't really expose the full story and motivations for an individual's choice. For example I want to travel the 93 mile journey to work relatively frugally, yet at the moment this represents about 25% of the admittedly low mileage I do in my car (I take the train most of the time). It doesn't give clarity to the fact that I have no problem "averaging" say 35 mpg with the family in the car on the way to the beach by which time on arrival the engine probably isn't warm!
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 11:21 AM | #32 |
Lieutenant
31
Rep 491
Posts |
You buy a petrol or a diesel based on your own circumstances and what works best for you.
Financially it doesn't make sense for someone to purchase a diesel who do less than 10K miles a year BUT maybe they bought it because they like the lazy driving style and the torque it provides for overtaking. On the other hand, a person who buys a 335i but does 20K mles a year won't benefit financially but maybe prefers the engine sound and also gets paid a decent pence per mile for driving. All horses for courses. I am glad people on here prefer petrol and some prefer diesel otherwise there wouldn't be much debate!
__________________
Fiat Panda, Nova 1.2 Merit, Metro 1.1s, Metro GTI, Pug 106 GTI, 2 WRX's, 2 STI's, Focus 1.6 estate, Megane, Focus ST-2, BMW 123D, NOW 335d XD.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 11:22 AM | #33 |
Lieutenant
31
Rep 491
Posts |
Also if everyone drove petrols, the prices for petrol would rocket and the diesel would go down. Also vice versa! Glad for the variety!
__________________
Fiat Panda, Nova 1.2 Merit, Metro 1.1s, Metro GTI, Pug 106 GTI, 2 WRX's, 2 STI's, Focus 1.6 estate, Megane, Focus ST-2, BMW 123D, NOW 335d XD.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 11:41 AM | #34 | |
Brigadier General
1050
Rep 3,154
Posts |
Quote:
I did have a 335i in 07 and the sound of that baby was glorious, I do miss that but the tractor sounds great under load. In between I have had a Twingo 133 (shocking build but its a renault!) and a 107 1.0L. So the 335d feels like a P1 lol |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 12:06 PM | #35 | ||
Banned
10995
Rep 32,881
Posts |
Quote:
I would put my life on the residuals meaning the 335d is the same if not cheaper to buy (and therefore also cheaper to lease) so every mile you drive in the diesel is saving you money! |
||
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 12:41 PM | #36 |
General
6733
Rep 20,651
Posts |
The other bit with low mileage is for some (me) I bike in a lot usually, however tend to do single long journeys.
So when I do drive to Newcastle for family, or South Wales, North London etc on business I want decent returns for my fuel. Then there is fact with 3 series there are a good choice of set ups for diesel. 330d s drive 330d x drive 335d For petrol 335i It's a cast of one. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 02:03 PM | #37 |
Major
319
Rep 1,091
Posts |
Low mileage? That'll be me - I do say 6,000/yr and have still opted for 335xd. I like to see good mpg on my long journeys too and with the healthy discount over petrol, the jobs a goodun.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 02:37 PM | #38 |
Lieutenant
99
Rep 464
Posts |
Cost to me was a bit of a premium, about expected for the xDrive, but partially levelled by the better contribution on offer. Once fuel + tax are factored in it's about the same for the 335d vs 335i. Cost wasn't really an overriding factor though.
My wife has a bearing in this decision, she really like the sure footed feel of AWD and the way it pulls without revving high. She'll be the one doing the school runs in winter in it. I'm also keen on the benefits of AWD but let's not turn this thread into that argument! I was a bit nervous about putting her in a powerful RWD I admit. So it ticked the boxes important to us; fast, torquey, AWD, and minimal running cost above the monthly's, it's the only diesel I've driven where i really liked the engine so we went for it. In terms of what I felt was the best 'value' it was a 335i PPK touring with a Manual box, with good options it was cheaper by enough to offset extra fuel and better suited to our low mileage. So I don't disagree with Pablo's comments at all. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 02:39 PM | #39 |
Captain
61
Rep 949
Posts |
The main reasons I choose diesels, despite not doing big miles anymore:
1. Road tax lower 2. Range of the fuel tank! typically 550+ 3. Torque 4. Mpg, typically 50+ versus 30+ in petrol 5. Residuals Downsides: 1. Noisier and the rattle 2. Not as quick from standing start to 20mph 3. Higher fuel cost per litre As you can see, the pros outweigh the cons in my opinion but a petrol hybrid could be a game changer |
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 02:53 PM | #41 |
Captain
127
Rep 976
Posts |
I've thought for a long time the initial outlay for a diesel takes some clawing back in fuel economy, but as others have said, the resale value is generally higher on the tractors. Makes it a close one.
My purchase was mostly ruled by the xdrive, I would have had a hard decision had they offered a rhd 335ix (when I say a hard decision, I mean a carefully biased explanation to her indoors of how the petrol model wouldn't work out any more expensive...) Great post Pablo |
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 02:55 PM | #43 |
Captain
127
Rep 976
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 03:18 PM | #44 |
Major
319
Rep 1,091
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|