Burger tuning B58

Baldmonkey22 · 12-16-2015, 09:54 PM

Very nice power! I test drove a 335 and a 340 back to back and the power of the 340 was quite noticeable and impressive, I'm coming from a tuned 15' STI and I'm still impressed by my 340 and my STI was pretty damn quick...

rednose · 12-16-2015, 10:30 PM

A graph with tune only on 93 would be nice......

FC4 · 12-16-2015, 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rednose

A graph with tune only on 93 would be nice......

Like this?

rednose · 12-17-2015, 12:04 AM

Why do they run so lean???, almost 14-1

auf Deutsch · 12-17-2015, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FC4

Like this?

You sure that's 93? BMS is CA based.

Willizm · 12-18-2015, 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rednose

Why do they run so lean???, almost 14-1

I believe Terry mentions something about the DME limiting the fueling in an attempt to thwart tuning. If that is the case, well, it's only a matter of time before there is a way around that i'm sure.

cptcrunch · 12-18-2015, 02:41 PM

Really wish we had some MPPK 340i dyno runs to compare with the BMS tune. I'm interested in what BMS builds, but the warranty of the MPPK is a huge selling point.

BUT, if the difference in price/power is big enough, BMS may be the winner from my tune budget.

rednose · 12-18-2015, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willizm

I believe Terry mentions something about the DME limiting the fueling in an attempt to thwart tuning. If that is the case, well, it's only a matter of time before there is a way around that i'm sure.

Even the stock tune runs lean.

As an example below is my stock 328i dyno run and BMS stg 1 dyno run.

You can clearly see the stock tune is pretty rich and the BMS tune is almost perfect at just under 12-1 AFR's

ocN55 · 12-20-2015, 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by auf Deutsch

You sure that's 93? BMS is CA based.

Sometimes Terry will say it's a 93 octane run because he adds some octane booster. Not sure if he did in that graph though.

auf Deutsch · 12-23-2015, 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ocN55

Sometimes Terry will say it's a 93 octane run because he adds some octane booster. Not sure if he did in that graph though.

yep, confirmed 91 + nos octane booster

12-16-2015, 09:54 PM	#23
Baldmonkey22 Private First Class 15 Rep 100 Posts Drives: 2016 340i Join Date: Nov 2015 Location: Lancaster, CA. iTrader: (0)	Very nice power! I test drove a 335 and a 340 back to back and the power of the 340 was quite noticeable and impressive, I'm coming from a tuned 15' STI and I'm still impressed by my 340 and my STI was pretty damn quick...
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-16-2015, 10:30 PM	#24
rednose First Lieutenant 65 Rep 365 Posts Drives: F30 330i LCI M Sport Join Date: May 2015 Location: Sydney iTrader: (0)	A graph with tune only on 93 would be nice......
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-17-2015, 12:04 AM	#26
rednose First Lieutenant 65 Rep 365 Posts Drives: F30 330i LCI M Sport Join Date: May 2015 Location: Sydney iTrader: (0)	Why do they run so lean???, almost 14-1
	Appreciate 1 Quote

12-18-2015, 02:41 PM	#29
cptcrunch Captain Crunch 168 Rep 548 Posts Drives: 2016 340i Join Date: May 2011 Location: Cincinnati iTrader: (0)	Really wish we had some MPPK 340i dyno runs to compare with the BMS tune. I'm interested in what BMS builds, but the warranty of the MPPK is a huge selling point. BUT, if the difference in price/power is big enough, BMS may be the winner from my tune budget. __________________ On Order (in transit): BMW iX 50, Oxide Grey Retired: BMW Welt Delivery 4/14/16: European Delivery - 2016 340i EBII/Saddle - ZMP \| ZCW \| ZDA \| ZLP \| ZTP \| M Adaptive \| Rear Shades \| MPPSK Before and After Dyno Retired: 2011 335D Space Grey/Black - ZSP \| ZPP \| ZCW \| 6FL \| Sat Radio \| Nav \| $600 Base Audio Upgrade
	Appreciate 1 Quote