[mike@Vossen]

The 911 is the target for handling....it will be priced in the 70k or so range....

The Chief Engineer is a great guy

[angelr]

Did you get any powerplant details?

[Viffermike]

Originally Posted by mike@Vossen

The 911 is the target for handling....it will be priced in the 70k or so range....

The Chief Engineer is a great guy

The Supra or the Z5?

A $70k Supra will be a mistake if it's badged a Toyota. Pricing it that high would go against nearly everything Tetsuya Tada stands for regarding performance cars, not to mention the current market for two-seat coupes by "plebian" marques ... and if it's more expensive than the Z5, it'll be an even bigger mistake.

Now if it's badged a Lexus, that changes everything. But by the looks of that mule, it ain't gonna be no Lexus.

[R N M]

Rumors are it may be Hybrid and have AWD - $70k is a lot and a huge step up from 86 pricing.

Maybe there will be a base version in RWD and non-hybrid that will be cheaper i hope.

[angelr]

Originally Posted by R N M

Rumors are it may be Hybrid and have AWD - $70k is a lot and a huge step up from 86 pricing.

Maybe there will be a base version in RWD and non-hybrid that will be cheaper i hope.

My 95 supra tt stickered for 58k if I recall, still have it in my closet along with the spare key and touch up paint. My z4 m coupe about the same almost 10 years later. In that regard I don't think 70k is out of line given the last supra's price, adjusted for inflation I got over 90k on the site I checked.

[R N M]

Nobody bought it back then hence it was discontinued.

There are a ton of performance cars these days with base price under $70k including M2/3/4....Supra should be around $50k-70k for it to sell, on par with Corvette

[angelr]

Originally Posted by R N M

Nobody bought it back then hence it was discontinued.

There are a ton of performance cars these days with base price under $70k including M2/3/4....Supra should be around $50k-70k for it to sell, on par with Corvette

Granted they only sold around 11k in the states from 93-98, but my point still stands that at 70k it wouldn't be out of line considering historical pricing. Still might not sell though. Also much of this will depend upon what the car actually gets delivered with tech and engine wise so it can be compared to existing offerings a little more closely.

[FriskyDingo]

Jalopnik thinks they know how it will look-

http://jalopnik.com/exclusive-heres-...-su-1787377881

[Red Bread]

Wheels are horrific, but the rest is actually pretty believable for a Supra. Still holding out hope it has a straight not a vee six.

[eluded]

Supdawg.....

[hoaloaken23]

wow, not bad, I like this style

[scoobysaurus]

Originally Posted by FriskyDingo

Jalopnik thinks they know how it will look-

http://jalopnik.com/exclusive-heres-...-su-1787377881

Not bad.. not bad at all! I hope they're right again like they were with the C7. I wish it looked a bit 'angrier' but I don't mind this '90's look' either.

[Someone?]

Originally Posted by angelr

My 95 supra tt stickered for 58k if I recall, still have it in my closet along with the spare key and touch up paint. My z4 m coupe about the same almost 10 years later. In that regard I don't think 70k is out of line given the last supra's price, adjusted for inflation I got over 90k on the site I checked.

58k in 95? that was the rip off of the century!! They where Awesome cars but thats near 100k today.

[angelr]

Especially when the corvette and rx7 was so much cheaper. It was still worth it in my view, there weren't that many vehicles as capable available at the time. My 95 would embarrass my 383 LPE firebird with nothing more than a downpipe and 18 psi and that 383 had more power than when delivered from Lingenfelter having bumped comp, changed cam and heads. Ran 11.5's @ 122 on radials and stock twins and low 10's @ 140+ with a smallish single and about 600 hp. Had 900 whp in the final setup but I never ran it again although similar customer cars I did were trapping over 153 at full weight. Great cars and they can handle too, having a arms all around and good balance.

Originally Posted by ibmike

58k in 95? that was the rip off of the century!! They where Awesome cars but thats near 100k today.

[Spinnetti]

I hope they get it "right" and not priced like the last one (in today's dollars).... Would make me a good company car.

[Bucki14]

Originally Posted by scoobysaurus

Not bad.. not bad at all! I hope they're right again like they were with the C7. I wish it looked a bit 'angrier' but I don't mind this '90's look' either.

I need more! I'm not a huge fan of this look at all. Front lights left to be desired for and a lot of that supercar challenger look is gone. Looks sort of bland to me..I need more hips/curves.

Car looks like a better ft86

[DASHOCKER]

car will be epic. welcome back supra

[nyalpine90]

needs a drop

[007_e350]

I love that thing ... wait it's a bmw collaboration, that's gonna kill the Toyota reliability image haha

[WiS3GuY Ey]

Looks almost like a tiberon

[Vossen wheels]

Excited for the new Supra.

[nyalpine90]

it would be nice if they keep some of old design/shape.

like nsx i like the old design better.