09-23-2018, 07:06 PM | #1 |
Private First Class
26
Rep 144
Posts |
Any issues running 89 octane instead of 91 on a 430i?
Are there any issues with doing this long term? Any idea on how much HP is lost running 89 rather than 91? (91 is the highest here in CA)
|
09-23-2018, 07:57 PM | #2 |
Major
707
Rep 1,170
Posts |
__________________
'16 340xi Mineral Grey/Black Leather, MPSS on 18" 398 Orbit Grey wheels, ZF 8HP50, MPPSK+CF Tips, ZTR, ZMP, ZTP, ZCW, ZDA, ZDB, Black Kidney Grilles.
'09 Outback for a beater and grocery getter. |
Appreciate
6
|
09-23-2018, 08:42 PM | #3 |
Colonel
983
Rep 2,193
Posts |
Here's a recent "discussion" on the subject: https://www.bimmerfest.com/forums/sh....php?t=1292015
__________________
____________________________________________
2015 BMW 228i in EstorilBlau II Metallic / Terra Dakota Leather - 6-speed manual, M Sport Package, Cold Weather Package, Lighting Package, Premium Package, Harman Kardon premium sound, Anti-theft alarm system, Blue Metallic Matt Accent Moldings, Aluminum Hexagon Interior Strips, Anthracite Headlining |
Appreciate
0
|
09-23-2018, 09:50 PM | #5 |
Private
51
Rep 72
Posts |
I just don't understand people who buy expensive cars, often spend thousands on accessories and mods but get cheap on gas rating...
Honestly, I would never go lower than 89 since that's what is required. They say they recommend 91 so I put 91... Since I got a JB4 I always use 94 when available and 91 when there is nothing else I do not have any numbers regarding power or mileage, but on most cars I had, I could feel the car ran smoother with the recommenced grade. Also, unless you drive 3000 miles per month, the difference between 89 and 91 will be only a few dollars per month so why take a chance? |
09-23-2018, 09:50 PM | #6 |
New Member
20
Rep 26
Posts |
I strongly recommend you use the proper grade of fuel. If the car didn't need it then they wouldn't have it on there when there are other grades . Not using the proper grade can cause pre detonation and long term conditions of this can harm the car. Plus if the manual says to use 91 or higher and you don't it can potentially void a warranty claim if a problem does arise.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2018, 06:06 AM | #7 | ||
Sedan Driver
389
Rep 1,018
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
You'll probably lose 5-8hp using 89 compared to 91. But you'll probably feel the torque loss a lot more (somewhere in the range of 20-30 ft-lbs).
__________________
Slapping on M Performance parts, ZHP, badges, and stickers does not ///M car make
ZCP | ZHP | ZTR | ZE0 | MSport | ZMP | DHP | MStickerPack | THP | MPPSK | MPPK BMW MSP Lightweight Jacket | DTM Motorsport Team Cap| BMW M Drift Cat 5 | BMW M Thermo Mug |
||
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2018, 06:47 AM | #8 |
Second Lieutenant
485
Rep 226
Posts
Drives: G81 M3T / X5 F15 30d
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: WILTS
|
Would be great if someone did some dyno testing on the different octanes available. Here in the UK the lowest is 95 octane, which I use, I often wonder whether the ECU would adjust up to make the most of the 98 octane available?
__________________
Proud owner of G81 M3 Touring
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2018, 07:05 AM | #9 | ||
Lieutenant General
8218
Rep 16,054
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2018, 07:21 AM | #10 | |
Sedan Driver
389
Rep 1,018
Posts |
Quote:
Since you mentioned practicality here, the op can download the BMW M timer app and do some 0-60s between 89 octane and 91 octane and see what real life difference it makes. not really here to preach higher octane is better, just giving the op all the info i know so he can make a decision.
__________________
Slapping on M Performance parts, ZHP, badges, and stickers does not ///M car make
ZCP | ZHP | ZTR | ZE0 | MSport | ZMP | DHP | MStickerPack | THP | MPPSK | MPPK BMW MSP Lightweight Jacket | DTM Motorsport Team Cap| BMW M Drift Cat 5 | BMW M Thermo Mug |
|
Appreciate
1
blankito50.50 |
09-24-2018, 09:52 AM | #11 |
Colonol Forbin
208
Rep 338
Posts |
It's a no brainer to put the best possible gas in the car you spent 40-70K on.
Knock/detonation is NOT your friend. Octane matters. It's scientific fact, not opinion. Sure a stock powered car can probably get away with running 89, but that doesn't mean you should do it. You're running a forced induction engine, you don't want to be pinching pennies around the way it breathes and eats. Air and fuel. You can probably get away with running your car a quart of oil low all the time, but that doesn't mean you should do it! |
Appreciate
2
insanecoder1410.00 |
09-24-2018, 11:22 AM | #14 |
Lieutenant Colonel
772
Rep 1,503
Posts |
If you’re just tooling around town or commuting to work during rush hour, I don’t see how you’d notice the loss of a few hp from using 89 octane vs 91. Crazy fact: when you’re at partial throttle you’re not using every last bit of power your engine can deliver. That said, I did know one guy for whom every single drive involved a moral imperative to drive as fast as humanly possible and who drove a car with a gas pedal (and brakes) that apparently was completely binary - either full gas or none at all. If you’re like that guy, then yeah go with the 91 octane.
Regarding engine knock - yes it’s a bad thing. That’s why modern engines detect knock and adjust for it. Using 89 octane will not damage the engine. Personally I just use 91 not due to any deep-seated desire to have all 300 lb-ft of torque available to me when I’m driving to the grocery store, but just because I don’t really give a crap either way and I can afford it. But I did used to care about saving a few bucks and used 89 octane in my E46 for about a decade with no ill-effects; except for road trips where I’d be blasting uphill through mountains with plenty of full throttle - then I’d spring for 91. Do what floats your boat. Your engine will be fine. It’s more important to use a name-brand gas with good detergents, IMHO. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2018, 11:57 AM | #15 |
Cheapskate
4445
Rep 4,993
Posts |
I get the desire for statistical data and tests but there's a point where you can just be realistic. Research doesn't trump common sense. And the fact of the matter is that these cars can accomodate a lot, including lower octane ratings, but you will see a degradation in performance. OEMs tune cars on higher octanes to improve efficiency and ratings across the board. So put in 89, let the car pull timing and adjust, and move on if you want to. But you're not really concerned about operating on the limit if you're putting in the minimum octane rating "until" you see hard evidence that something is being damaged.
I don't even argue with people that I know don't care about their cars. You hear people saying it's a lease, they'd rather save the money, etc. all the time. I'm just surprised to see it on an enthusiast forum. I may run the cheapest 93 that's a reasonable distance from my home/work, but i still will always run 93. |
Appreciate
1
Dmorenonj0.00 |
09-24-2018, 12:01 PM | #16 |
Lieutenant General
8218
Rep 16,054
Posts |
Define best. It's not synonymous with most expensive, or highest octane. Stock BMW four bangers just don't have high enough compression ratios or boost pressures or sufficiently advanced timing to gain any benefit from higher than 89 octane unless driven in track situations.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2018, 12:36 PM | #17 | |
Colonol Forbin
208
Rep 338
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2018, 12:47 PM | #18 |
Lieutenant Colonel
772
Rep 1,503
Posts |
|
Appreciate
1
car_driver145.50 |
09-24-2018, 01:39 PM | #19 | |
2020 Z4 M40i - 2022 M4C Convt
3126
Rep 5,264
Posts
Drives: 2020 Z4 M40i - 2022 M4C Convrt
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Raleigh, NC - OIB, NC
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 1965 COBRA (FFR rep ... [8.57]
2023 Jeep Wrangler ... [9.50] 2009 Yamaha V-Star [0.00] Cars 2-BMW, 2-FORD, ... [0.00] 2023 Ford Expeditio ... [0.00] 2020 Z4 M40i [10.00] 2022 BMW M4C [7.25] 1998 FORD Ranger 4X4 [0.00] |
Quote:
Basic tunes are running the 4 cylinder in the low 20's. 6 cylinder N54 hack was to use 4 cylinder parts to enable boost rates over 20psi. If you have not dumped logs of the stock 4 cylinder engine how would you know what the the ignition advance curve looks like?
__________________
Kevin
Dravit Gray, Black Leather, Moonlight Roof, Red Calipers 2022 M4C - 2020 Z4 M40i - 2023 FORD Expedition XLT Max 4X4 400BHP - 2009 V-Star - 1998 Ranger 4X4 5MT - 1965 Cobra (R) 5MT - 2023 Jeep Wrangler Sport S 6MT Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 09-24-2018 at 01:53 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2018, 03:54 PM | #21 | |
Private
51
Rep 72
Posts |
Quote:
Your stock BMW car is simply tuned to be used with 91 octane but is "okay" using 89. Another CHIP might be tuned for 93 octane, etc etc. Another good example is the JB4 on map 5, which will detect the octane level in the gas and change the performance accordingly. I completely agree that octane level means nothing on a Toyota Corolla that is designed to run over 87 octane. If you put 91 or 93, it won't help anything. However, putting lower than what the car is designed for, that's another story... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2018, 04:08 PM | #22 |
Colonel
644
Rep 2,294
Posts |
I am in the camp that runs the octane rated gas that BMW recommends for my particular car. I use 91 and 94 (Chevron) exclusively.
This topic keeps coming up about every 2 months or so, and there are always those who run lesser octane rated gas than is recommended. And I always wonder why you own a vehicle with recommended 91, then run 89 or even 87. I just don't get it......I have to believe that BMW recommends 91 for a reason.......
__________________
2018 340i xDrive M Perf Edtn Sunset Orange
Previous BMWs - 19 others since 1971. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Tags |
430i, engine, gas, issues, octane, performance, problems |
|
|