11-18-2012, 09:23 AM | #397 | |
Banned
869
Rep 6,248
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2012, 09:31 AM | #398 |
Major
1890
Rep 1,231
Posts |
Yes I remember he said they would look like 5GT but flatter and his own sketch seemed to confirm that, but what can be seen underneath the tarp doesn't quite reflect that
Last edited by advantage20; 11-18-2012 at 12:36 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2012, 09:39 AM | #399 | |
Banned
869
Rep 6,248
Posts |
Quote:
One thing that bugs me about all the renders so far, is that NONE get the kidney/headlight transition correct! It's not going to look just like an F30 nose. The lights will connect to the top of the kidneys, then pull away as it goes lower. You can see this on the 5GT (kind of), or the 328i hommage. SCOTT26's sketches of the nose (side) reflect this clearly. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2012, 09:42 AM | #400 |
Major
1890
Rep 1,231
Posts |
Done this very quickly... Still puzzling
If these were 18" though the result would approximately equal the E92 length. Last edited by advantage20; 11-18-2012 at 10:36 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2012, 11:00 AM | #401 | |
Major
1890
Rep 1,231
Posts |
Quote:
Last edited by advantage20; 11-18-2012 at 11:15 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2012, 11:06 AM | #402 | |
Colonel
123
Rep 2,024
Posts |
Quote:
The reason that isn't working is that the car is not perfectly straight across in relation to the camera. If it is pointing towards or away from the camera it will hide the length when measuring it. Last edited by bimmerjph; 11-18-2012 at 11:18 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2012, 11:25 AM | #403 |
Banned
869
Rep 6,248
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2012, 05:31 PM | #404 |
Captain
307
Rep 691
Posts |
This looks promising!
Maybe this has been brought up in the thread before but to me it looks like the back wheel is too much forward in the wheel housing. But i guess thats going to be fixed on the production cars as this pictured car is only a test car. Last edited by Holset; 11-18-2012 at 05:37 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2012, 10:24 AM | #406 |
Major
1890
Rep 1,231
Posts |
Of course they will, why wouldn't they?
I guess the 4er will (globally) get: 420i (184ps) 425i (218ps) 428i (245ps) 435i (320ps?) 420d (184ps) 425d (218ps) 430d (258ps) 435d (313ps) + M Performance variant(s) 340ps M440i?? 330ps M440d?? Last edited by advantage20; 11-20-2012 at 08:57 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-20-2012, 11:53 AM | #407 |
Private First Class
7
Rep 132
Posts |
Maybe this car is shorter. It is a 2 door for one and it would look better shorter. They also want to seperate it from the 3 sedan. Being physically different also helps to establish another reason for the increased cost as it is usually more expensive from a production numbers view to have two different wheel bases.
Also it kind of makes sense. 4 series 2 door shorter on its own wheel base, 3 sedan on its longer wheelbase, and 4 Grand Coupe on the stretched 3 series LI wheel base. It starts to visually really separate the cars. I like it as with the light weight suspension the M version is supposed to be getting and less body to haul around the M4 could have a nice weight loss. Also the 4 series would be a more nibble handler with the shorter wheel base. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-23-2012, 05:25 PM | #409 |
Private First Class
22
Rep 198
Posts |
The car actually looks smaller than the F30. At least judging from the man standing outside the car. Definitely looks more sexy and more sporty than E92 though on the side pics (compared to the red E92)
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2012, 09:23 AM | #410 |
Second Lieutenant
88
Rep 227
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 01:40 PM | #412 | |
Captain
197
Rep 881
Posts |
Quote:
Also, would the M-sport be available from the start or can we expect a 6 month delay as with the F30? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 02:46 PM | #413 |
Lieutenant
35
Rep 501
Posts |
I'm going to reserve my thought the F32 will be priced well above F30. Time will tell... I don't think BMW will price it beyond it's intended market, look at the E89 Z4, priced too high for the casual sports car enthusiast.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 03:47 PM | #414 | |
Zooombie attaaack!!
137
Rep 1,179
Posts |
Quote:
The F32 is a bit on the short side AND that's a bad angle. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2012, 10:30 PM | #415 |
Private First Class
20
Rep 121
Posts |
we'll see this car soon enough, in january in detroit. i'm guessing this car will look really aggro with the ///M tech package. can't wait to see if they will go with the upgraded 6 with more power in this first year.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2012, 02:46 PM | #416 |
Second Lieutenant
27
Rep 246
Posts |
why do they feel it necessary to change the name of the legendary sedan that defined a new class of automobiles, as well as making this brand as widely ubiquitous as it is right now.
__________________
I'm not superstitious, but I am a little stitious.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2012, 03:24 PM | #417 | |
TIM YOYO
1506
Rep 3,282
Posts
Drives: 2013 M3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
|
Quote:
Change is inevitable. If BMW still made the E30, they'd be out of business. See also: Lotus.
__________________
His: 2019 R1250GS - Black
Hers: 2013 X3 28i - N20 Mineral Silver / Sand Beige / Premium, Tech Past: 2013 ///M3 - Interlagos Blue Black M-DCT Past: 2010 135i - TiAg Coral Red 6MT ///M-Sport |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2012, 04:17 PM | #418 |
Second Lieutenant
27
Rep 246
Posts |
i'm ALL for design change, but dont change the legendary monicker. it's still "BMW" isn't it, why don't they change the whole entire brands name too if change is what they're after. I just think it's an unnecessary measure taken, just to compete with mercedes or audi. people will respect you if you stick to your guns.
__________________
I'm not superstitious, but I am a little stitious.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|