08-19-2013, 07:30 PM | #1 |
Banned
20
Rep 688
Posts |
Anything being done to address poor top-end?
It's no secret that these engines aren't big breathers. It's quite disappointing to see so many dyno charts where torque is on a downward slope after 4,000 RPM and fall completely off a cliff at 6,000. Yes, it's the nature of any turbocharged engine to have a torque-curve favoring low and mid-range torque, but these take it to the extreme. Have any of the tuners spent time focusing on preserving torque in the upper-RPM range, as in where it actually matters? What seems to be the main culprit for these engines running out of steam besides the obvious being a very small turbo? Wastegates not allowing boost to hold? Cams? We know it's not intake/exhaust restriction, otherwise we'd have 4" turbo-backs available showing impressive gains, so what gives?
Most out there believe a strong mid-range is what makes a car fast, but it's simply not true. Sure, it's good for passing in a given gear for a small burst of acceleration, but in actuality, it doesn't make for a fast car when time spent at WOT beyond one gear leads to decreasing HP. And since the majority of these cars are equipped with the 8-speed autos, this issue is exacerbated. I think this is what's holding these cars back from being faster given their impressive (on paper) peak HP/TQ figures. Low-end TQ is good if you're towing something, though... |
08-19-2013, 10:49 PM | #2 | |||
Captain
77
Rep 665
Posts |
Quote:
Nope. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2013, 11:18 PM | #3 | |
Banned
20
Rep 688
Posts |
Care to show me a dyno chart of a stock N54, N55, or pretty much any turbocharged car with a TQ curve like a naturally-aspirated engine? Really, I'll wait...
8 forward gears more tightly spaced than a car with 5 or 6 gears. Take one out to an open stretch of road and leave the throttle wide open from a dig or low speed for 15-20 seconds. Let me know how low the RPMs drop every time the car changes gear. Now take a look at the car's TQ curve. What is the slope of that curve in the entire RPM range the engine is spending its time. Quote:
Thanks for your contribution. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2013, 12:52 AM | #4 |
First Lieutenant
24
Rep 398
Posts |
Dang f32...seems like you want an m3 or m4....or maybe a 911 Turbo S. Its an F30.. a 4 door sedan...Its pretty quick for what it is. Hell its as fast as my old 2000 vette. You want to solve the problem of TQ drop off? Why? It's damn skippy through 120 mph. More than enough for day to day...(its intended use)...I'm not getting the question, what were you expecting?
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2013, 06:10 AM | #5 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
77
Rep 1,793
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2014 F30 335 X-Drive | 6-MT | Alpine White/Coral Red | ZMM ZDH ZDA |
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2013, 08:03 AM | #6 |
Banned
3214
Rep 2,385
Posts |
Quite nice for those who want punch out of a corner on a nice windy road, and aren't all that excited by a straight road and seeing how fast we can go.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2013, 08:42 AM | #7 |
Enlisted Member
5
Rep 34
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2013, 08:52 AM | #8 |
Brigadier General
1538
Rep 3,332
Posts |
The turbocharger itself determines where you're going to get that peak. You could optimize the top end if you're willing to throw on a big turbo and accept a lot of turbo lag and no low end by swapping out the turbo.
Makes for a great drag/track car but a crappy daily driver. So if you want more top end, look into a new turbo. The tune and cranking up the boost will only get you so far.
__________________
Current: '20 X5, '18 M3 ZCP
Previous: '11 E90 335i, '11 E90 M3, '16 VW GTI, '15 M235i, '13 335i, '08 TL-S, '00 Corvette |
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2013, 06:53 PM | #9 | |
Brigadier General
798
Rep 4,784
Posts |
Quote:
11 mustang Pretty close (well if you don't count the turbo lag)
__________________
ERnie
2016 BSM/f80/ZCP |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2013, 06:55 PM | #10 |
Private First Class
9
Rep 159
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2013, 07:04 PM | #11 | ||
Brigadier General
798
Rep 4,784
Posts |
Quote:
This should help Quote:
http://www.full-race.com/articles/efrturbotechbrief.pdf
__________________
ERnie
2016 BSM/f80/ZCP |
||
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2013, 07:16 PM | #12 |
Banned
20
Rep 688
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2013, 08:04 PM | #13 |
Brigadier General
798
Rep 4,784
Posts |
Or, you can go ahead and read the post above you.
__________________
ERnie
2016 BSM/f80/ZCP |
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2013, 08:05 PM | #14 |
Banned
103
Rep 1,715
Posts |
Any way you look at it, this car is a daily driver, not a track car, so who cares? Run a few laps with your modified 335 at a track and your engine will go into a slump...if you want high end power, buy a high end car!
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2013, 08:54 PM | #15 |
Brigadier General
1538
Rep 3,332
Posts |
Internal combustion engines aren't new or rocket science. Air + fuel = bang.
The engine runs out of air, less bang. You want more bang, add more air. Intakes don't do much when your bottleneck is at the turbo. Remember that turbos are just one of many compromises that can go into an engine. You won't ever get the smooth linear torque of a high revving low torque engine like the M3 and the low end grunt of a big displacement V8. Unless of course you boost an LSx engine. Then yeah, that's pretty much perfect. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-21-2013, 03:11 AM | #16 | |||
Captain
77
Rep 665
Posts |
Quote:
http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/t...no-tested.html Quote:
You're also not understanding how torque multiplier/gears/rpms work. Assuming full traction, an 8 speed BMW is going to have a gearing advantage over a 5 or 6 speed car. Not to mention, horsepower is a function of torque and rpm....I don't care that my torque is dropping at higher rpms vs. in the mid range so long as my car is getting the most power to the ground via gear multiplier+average horsepower throughout the RPM range I'm using. I'd rather be making 220rwhp at say 6600rpms in say 3rd gear than say 230rwhp at say 4600rpms in 4th gear. Quote:
I'm glad you learned something. |
|||
Appreciate
0
|
08-21-2013, 08:54 AM | #17 |
Lieutenant Colonel
289
Rep 1,575
Posts |
slightly larger turbos do wonders for the n54s, they sustain the potent levels of midrange torque while pushing out a higher rpm horsepower curve.
Vargas and RB are working on the N55 turbo upgrade and from what I've read it should be compatible with the f30/2 |
Appreciate
0
|
08-21-2013, 10:17 AM | #18 |
Brigadier General
1538
Rep 3,332
Posts |
Since you want to compare apples to apples take the universally loved Toyota 2JZ-GTE. It's basically spec for spec identical. 3.0L Straight 6, single or sequential turbos, and modded heavily for the past 20 years.
Go out and look at some of the Supra forums and you can get an idea what different turbos will do for an engine. You'll very quickly see the impact of the sequential turbos, single turbo, or giant turbo. At the end of the day you have to decide do you want to maximize the top end at the exchange of absolutely no power in the normal driving range and crazy turbo lag? Turbos make up for displacement, but they can't do it across the rev range so you have to pick where you want it. If you want a torque curve like this, buy a V8. ;-)
__________________
Current: '20 X5, '18 M3 ZCP
Previous: '11 E90 335i, '11 E90 M3, '16 VW GTI, '15 M235i, '13 335i, '08 TL-S, '00 Corvette |
Appreciate
0
|
08-21-2013, 12:27 PM | #19 |
Major General
1824
Rep 6,979
Posts
Drives: 15 F80 M3, 22 G01 X3 30i
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Wendell, NC
|
This iteration of the N55 is all about BMW's "Efficient Dynamics", and not designed for tracking or racing. That falls to the "M"-engined cars, either NA (E46/E90 M3, E39/E60 M5 and M6, etc.). If you're really looking for a "top-end" high-revving engine, those are the cars to look at. This N55 provides more than adequate power with great fuel economy (especially with the 8AT and its top-2 overdrive gears), but in sport mode is also great for spirited driving (non-track). The low- and mid-range torque provides a great driving experience on streets and roads, but it's by no means a top-end high-rev racing powerplant.
__________________
2015 F80 ///M3 Sedan 7DCT Tanzanite, 2022 X3 sDrive30i 8AT Brooklyn Grey |
Appreciate
0
|
08-21-2013, 01:05 PM | #20 | |
Brigadier General
670
Rep 4,959
Posts |
Quote:
I loved my M Performance Power Kit-tuned F30 M Sport 335i. The N55 is truly an outstanding little turbocharged motor. However, as has been pointed out in this thread, the N55, tuned or not, does start to run out of steam as the revs climb and speed increases. The 6.2L V8 in my new C63, however, pulls and pulls relentlessly. The way it reels in on the highway on 80-140 pulls is on another level. That's what you get with a large-discplacement, free revving, naturally aspirated engine.
__________________
Current: '23 G20 M Sport 330i
Current: '20 X253 GLC300 SUV Gone: '20 W205 C43 Sedan Gone: '18 W205 C43 Sedan Gone: '13 W204 C63 Sedan |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-21-2013, 01:19 PM | #21 |
Captain
72
Rep 876
Posts |
I think this is what attracts me to the stock N55 setup. I don't have to tickle the rpms near redline to feel that strong seat of the pants acceleration. I enjoy being able to shift around 4k and still having max tq. I don't want to redline my car every day to get the last drip of power and tq out of it.
But at the end of the day there really is no replacement for displacement. I too have quite a bit of seat time in C63s and I really don't think a turboed motor will ever feel that good. If I could have a 6.2l beast and still get 35 mpg on the hgihway I'd be all over that but it's jut not a reality at this time. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-21-2013, 01:41 PM | #22 |
Banned
48
Rep 932
Posts |
I believe Rob Beck is working on an N55 Turbo upgrade for E9x's. Not sure how different fitment is compared to the F30's. I know the factory intakes are in different spots.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|