10-08-2018, 10:29 AM | #1 |
Captain
341
Rep 734
Posts |
Those who VT - Why do you do it?
Genuinely curious as to why people deliberately VT their cars.
How does this work out financially? Is it just a quick way to get in a newer car? |
10-08-2018, 10:58 AM | #3 |
First Lieutenant
166
Rep 311
Posts |
Does this not fuck your credit rating or at the very least your credibility with that manufacturers finance division? Seems like you're welching on a deal
Last edited by Oceanic; 10-08-2018 at 11:16 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2018, 11:21 AM | #6 |
Private First Class
70
Rep 140
Posts |
On the VT question, I'm about to VT and have a brake service indicator at 1200 miles at the moment am I OK if its still above zero at the point of VT?
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2018, 11:39 AM | #7 |
First Lieutenant
228
Rep 392
Posts |
To avoid excess mileage charges due to low mileage pcp taken out to afford the car.
__________________
2017 Grey Black 340i M Sport MPPSK
2015 BSM 328i M Sport MPE - sold 2007 LMB 320i M Sport - sold |
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2018, 11:49 AM | #8 | |
Banned
10995
Rep 32,881
Posts |
Quote:
And because 4 years is too long to keep a car, but 4 year PCP is cheaper than a 3 year one. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2018, 01:03 PM | #9 |
Captain
94
Rep 715
Posts |
BMW seriously need to re-consider the final payments on their PCPs. This surely can't be great for business with BMWFS bearing most of the cost.
That said, BMW valued my F10 for £2.5k below the final payment based on the fact I had exceeded the mileage by 20k. But when I took the car to another car dealership they said their part-ex value would put the car into £2k of equity and a private sale would have made me about £3.5k. I imagine the dealers offering low ball offers isn't helping the matter either.
__________________
BMW E60 MY2008 (LCI) 2007-2013
BMW F10 MY2013 2013-2017 BMW F20 MY2013 2013-2016 BMW F30 MY2014 2014-2015 |
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2018, 01:35 PM | #10 |
Captain
377
Rep 623
Posts |
How does this work? Don't they make you pay the excess miles pro rated for the time you've had the car before you VT? They'd get rinsed if they let people get away with handing a car back with 1000's more miles than expected whether at the end of the term or at VT when more than 50% repayed
|
Appreciate
1
f30modern56.00 |
10-08-2018, 01:37 PM | #11 |
Captain
377
Rep 623
Posts |
From the BMW website....
"If you choose to voluntary terminate your agreement you must also pay for any excess mileage or damage deemed to be outside of fair wear and tear. For full details of the fair wear and tear guidelines, and the process should you choose to return your BMW, please go to Returning your BMW. If you are thinking of voluntarily terminating your Finance Agreement please call our Customer Services Centre." |
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2018, 01:41 PM | #12 |
Colonel
1084
Rep 2,376
Posts |
pretty much. Either stump up 2k of neg or vt, tough decision ............
__________________
Current - X3m Comp
Gone but not forgotten - F80 m3 Comp, F30 340i, F30 - 320i |
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2018, 01:44 PM | #13 | |
Banned
10995
Rep 32,881
Posts |
Quote:
It’s been discussed to death on legal beagles. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2018, 01:47 PM | #14 | |
Captain
377
Rep 623
Posts |
Quote:
I guess if you stuff them you'll never get BMW finance again?! Perhaps good if you are going to cut and run to another manufacturer... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2018, 01:50 PM | #15 | |
Banned
10995
Rep 32,881
Posts |
Quote:
I think the opposite, apparently if you VT to get another BMW on PCP they’re more likely to leave you alone as they’re still making money out of you. If you VT and don’t buy another then they will persue you hard and threaten court, but it is all blank threats. Last edited by teaston; 10-08-2018 at 01:58 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
1
JustChris17489.00 |
10-08-2018, 01:58 PM | #16 |
Captain
377
Rep 623
Posts |
Bit like those letters from private parking companies pursuing fines and the like
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2018, 02:03 PM | #17 |
Banned
10995
Rep 32,881
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2018, 02:16 PM | #18 |
Lieutenant General
8780
Rep 12,254
Posts |
Not at all like that - one is a parking scam and the other is a legitimate company being fleeced by individuals who have no intention of paying what they owe and are abusing a law there to protect people who can't pay.
|
Appreciate
2
MashinBenzin8459.00 B6WAF77.50 |
10-08-2018, 02:42 PM | #20 |
Lieutenant General
8780
Rep 12,254
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2018, 02:48 PM | #21 |
Banned
10995
Rep 32,881
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-08-2018, 02:56 PM | #22 | |
Major General
3122
Rep 5,681
Posts |
Quote:
Would the courts back them if they took it to court? Who knows but, as you say, the intention of the law is to protect those who can't pay and that being the case I can't see a court looking favourably on someone who's perfectly able to pay but just thinks they've found a clever way of avoiding doing so. To me it's a very clear pre-mediated abuse of the law and if someone fell flat on their face doing it they'd have no sympathy from me! |
|
Appreciate
4
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|